Table 1
Resident perception of gender parity
|
Men residents |
Women residents |
P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extremely unsatisfied/unsatisfied a |
Satisfied/extremely satisfied a |
Extremely unsatisfied/unsatisfied a |
Satisfied/extremely satisfied a |
– | |
|
Are you satisfied with your residency training experience? |
0 (0%) |
34 (94%) |
0 (0%) |
32 (97%) |
N/A |
|
Strongly disagree/disagree a |
Agree/strongly agree a |
Strongly disagree/disagree a |
Agree/strongly agree a |
– | |
|
Women are appropriately represented in senior positions in the department of internal medicine |
17 (41%) |
19 (45%) |
32 (70%) |
6 (13%) |
p = 0.000773 |
|
There is equal representation of both men and women teaching faculty on the wards and in clinics |
11 (26%) |
23 (55%) |
24 (52%) |
13 (28%) |
p = 0.006194 |
|
There is equal representation of both men and women faculty as discussants at educational conferences and grand rounds |
14 (33%) |
19 (45%) |
23 (50%) |
13 (28%) |
p = 0.0741 |
aBased on 5‑point Likert scale
Fig. 1
Faculty gender distribution by division, Department of Internal Medicine (2017)
Fig. 2
Gender distribution of leadership roles, Department of Internal Medicine (2017) (atotal number of positions available) [23–25]
Table 2
Gender distribution and relative gender parity in leadership and faculty teaching roles, Department of Internal Medicine (2017)
|
Men |
Women |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Departmental leadership rolesa |
21 (95%) |
1 (5%) |
p = 0.000312 (Chi-squared)b p = 0.0001 (Fisher exact)b |
|
Educational leadership rolesc |
23 (79%) |
6 (21%) |
p = 0.018086 (Chi-squared)b p = 0.0206 (Fisher exact)b |
|
Total inpatient faculty attending weeks |
1298 (69%) |
578 (31%) |
p < 0.00001 (Z score test for two proportions)b |
|
Total intensive care unit attending weeks |
260 (84%) |
50 (16%) |
p = 0.0271 (Z score test for two proportions)d |
|
Continuity clinic attending |
23 (45%) |
28 (55%) |
p = 0.62414 (Z score test for two proportions)e |
|
Inpatient morning report facilitators |
172 (80%) |
42 (20%) |
p < 0.00001 (Z score test for two proportions)b |
|
Ambulatory morning report facilitators |
142 (69%) |
63 (31%) |
p = 0.00398 (Z score test for two proportions)b |
|
Noon conference facilitators |
42 (72%) |
16 (28%) |
p = 0.03662 (Z score test for two proportions)b |
aPooled department chair, associate chairs and division chiefs
bCompared with gender representation in overall internal medicine faculty
cPooled program director, associate program directors, and fellowship program directors
dCompared with gender representation in pulmonary and critical care faculty only
eCompared with gender representation in division of general medicine only
Fig. 3
Gender distribution of teaching faculty on clinical services or education conference facilitator/presenter, Department of Internal Medicine (2017) (ainpatient time measured in number of weeks per year, bcontinuity clinic attendings assigned to half day per week for whole academic year, coccurs daily Monday–Friday, doccurs two times weekly, eoccurs once weekly (excluded monthly Morbidity and Mortality conference lead by CMRs from analysis))
