Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee

Gemke R Brand P Semmekrot B Toekomstbestendige Opleiding Pediatrie: TOP 2020 2017

Andolsek K Padmore J Hauer KE Holmboe E Clinical competency committees. A guidebook for programs 2015 Chicago The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Michaelsen LK Watson WE Black RH A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making J Appl Psychol 1989 74 834 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.834

Hauer KE ten Cate O Boscardin CK Ensuring resident competence: a narrative review of the literature on group decision making to inform the work of clinical competency committees J Grad Med Educ 2016 8 156 164 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00144.1

Hemmer PA Hawkins R Jackson JL Pangaro LN Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students’ professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship Acad Med 2000 75 167 173 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00016

Thomas MR Beckman TJ Mauck KF Cha SS Thomas KG Group assessments of resident physicians improve reliability and decrease halo error J Gen Intern Med 2011 26 759 764 10.1007/s11606-011-1670-4

Schwind CJ Williams RG Boehler ML Dunnington GL Do individual attendings’ post-rotation performance ratings detect residents’ clinical performance deficiencies? Acad Med 2004 79 453 457 10.1097/00001888-200405000-00016

Hill GW Group versus individual performance: are N+ 1 heads better than one? Psychol Bull 1982 91 517 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517

Hauer KE Chesluk B Iobst W Reviewing residents’ competence: a qualitative study of the role of clinical competency committees in performance assessment Acad Med 2015 90 1084 1092 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000736

Promes SB Wagner MJ Starting a clinical competency committee J Grad Med Educ 2014 6 163 164 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00444.1

Doty CI Roppolo LP Asher S How do emergency medicine residency programs structure their clinical competency committees? A survey Acad Emerg Med 2015 22 1351 1354 10.1111/acem.12804

Ketteler ER Auyang ED Beard KE Competency champions in the clinical competency committee: a successful strategy to implement milestone evaluations and competency coaching J Surg Educ 2014 71 36 38 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.012

French JC Dannefer EF Colbert CY A systematic approach toward building a fully operational clinical competency committee J Surg Educ 2014 71 e22 e7 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.04.005

Donato AA Alweis R Wenderoth S Design of a clinical competency committee to maximize formative feedback J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2016 6 33533 10.3402/jchimp.v6.33533

Chahine S Cristancho S Padgett J Lingard L How do small groups make decisions? Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 192 198 10.1007/s40037-017-0357-x

Dickey CC Thomas C Feroze U Nakshabandi F Cannon B Cognitive demands and bias: challenges facing clinical competency committees J Grad Med Educ 2017 9 162 164 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00411.1

Badley G The crisis in educational research: a pragmatic approach Eur Edu Res J 2003 2 296 308 10.2304/eerj.2003.2.2.7

Dolmans DH Tigelaar D Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60 Med Teach 2012 34 1 10 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595437

Hodges B Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective Med Teach 2013 35 564 568 10.3109/0142159X.2013.789134

Laughlin PR Adamopoulos J Social combination processes and individual learning for six-person cooperative groups on an intellective task J Pers Soc Psychol 1980 38 941 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.941

Surowiecki J Silverman MP The wisdom of crowds Am J Phys 2007 75 190 192 10.1119/1.2423042

Eva KW Hodges BD Scylla or Charybdis? Can we navigate between objectification and judgement in assessment? Med Educ 2012 46 914 919 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04310.x

Lu L Yuan YC McLeod PL Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2012 16 54 75 10.1177/1088868311417243

Janis IL Groupthink Psychol Today 1971 5 43 46

Jonker CM Van Riemsdijk MB Vermeulen B De Vos M Fornara N Pit JV Vouros G Shared mental models Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems VI. Coin 2010 2011 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer 132 151 10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_8

Schultze T Mojzisch A Schulz-Hardt S Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2012 118 24 36 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.006

Chernyshenko OS Miner AG Baumann MR Sniezek JA The impact of information distribution, ownership, and discussion on group member judgment: the differential cue weighting model Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2003 91 12 25 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00533-2

Stasser G Titus W Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion J Pers Soc Psychol 1985 48 1467 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

Greenhalgh L Chapman DI Negotiator relationships: construct measurement, and demonstration of their impact on the process and outcomes of negotiation Group Decis Negot 1998 7 465 489 10.1023/A:1008694307035

Schittekatte M Van Hiel A Effects of partially shared information and awareness of unshared information on information sampling Small Group Res 1996 27 431 449 10.1177/1046496496273006

Mesmer-Magnus JR DeChurch LA Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis J Appl Psychol 2009 94 534 546 10.1037/a0013773

Webster M Jr Rashotte LS Behavior, expectations and status Soc Forces 2010 88 1021 1049 10.1353/sof.0.0308

Kameda T Sugimori S Psychological entrapment in group decision making: an assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon J Pers Soc Psychol 1993 65 282 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.282

Stasson MF Kameda T Davis JH A model of agenda influences on group decisions Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 1997 1 316 10.1037/1089-2699.1.4.316

Waller BM Hope L Burrowes N Morrison ER Twelve (not so) angry men: managing conversational group size increases perceived contribution by decision makers Group Process Intergr Relat 2011 14 835 843 10.1177/1368430211407099

Laughlin PR Hatch EC Silver JS Boh L Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size J Pers Soc Psychol 2006 90 644 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644

Karotkin D Paroush J Optimum committee size: quality-versus-quantity dilemma Soc. Choice Welfare 2003 20 429 441 10.1007/s003550200190

Kerr NL Tindale RS Group performance and decision making Annu Rev Psychol 2004 55 623 655 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009

Hsieh H-F Shannon SE Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qual Health Res 2005 15 1277 1288 10.1177/1049732305276687

Bengtsson M How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis Nurs Plus Open 2016 2 8 14 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Stasser G Titus W Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion J Pers Soc Psychol 1987 53 81 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81

Boud D Molloy E Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013 38 698 712 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462

Boud D Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning Clin Teach 2015 12 3 7 10.1111/tct.12345

Cantillon P Sargeant J Giving feedback in clinical settings BMJ 2008 337 a1961 10.1136/bmj.a1961

Sargeant JM Mann KV Van der Vleuten CP Metsemakers JF Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009 14 399 410 10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4

Bonnefon J-F Feeney A De Neys W The risk of polite misunderstandings Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2011 20 321 324 10.1177/0963721411418472

Helmreich RL Managing human error in aviation Sci Am 1997 276 62 67 10.1038/scientificamerican0597-62

Marks MA Zaccaro SJ Mathieu JE Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments J Appl Psychol 2000 85 971 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971