References
- Harrison CJ Könings KD Schuwirth L Wass V Van der Vleuten C Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment Adv Health Sci Educ 2015 20 45 229 10.1007/s10459-014-9524-6
- Ricci M St-Onge C Xiao J Young M Students as stakeholders in assessment: how students perceive the value of an assessment Perspect Med Educ 2018 10.1007/s40037-018-0480-3
- Harrison CJ Könings KD Dannefer EF Schuwirth LW Wass V Van der Vleuten CP Factors influencing students’ receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures Perspect Med Educ 2016 5 276 284 10.1007/s40037-016-0297-x
- Rudland J Wilkinson T Smith-Han K Thompson-Fawcett M “You can do it late at night or in the morning. You can do it at home, I did it with my flatmate.” The educational impact of an OSCE Med Teach 2008 30 206 211 10.1080/01421590701851312
- Sehlbach C Govaerts MJ Mitchell S Rohde GG Smeenk FW Driessen EW Box-ticking and Olympic high jumping—Physicians’ perceptions and acceptance of national physician validation systems Med Teach 2018 40 1 6 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1470320
- Harrison CJ Könings KD Schuwirth LW Wass V van der Vleuten CP Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm BMC Med Educ 2017 17 73 10.1186/s12909-017-0912-5
- Harrison C Könings K Molyneux A Schuwirth L Wass V Van der Vleuten C Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage? Med Educ 2013 47 734 744 10.1111/medu.12209
- Savin-Baden M Understanding the impact of assessment on students in problem-based learning Innov Educ Teach Int 2004 41 221 233 10.1080/1470329042000208729
- Kaba R Sooriakumaran P The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship Int J Surg 2007 5 57 65 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.005
- Roter DL Hall JA Kern DE Barker LR Cole KA Roca RP Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress: a randomized clinical trial Arch Intern Med 1995 155 1877 1884 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430170071009
- Osler W Examinations, examiners and examinees Lancet 1913 182 1047 1050 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)77636-2
