Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of question text properties for equality monitoring Cover

Analysis of question text properties for equality monitoring

By: Daniel Zahra and  Steven A. Burr  
Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. Government Equalities Office Equality Act 2010 2010
  2. European Parliament Equal Treatment Directive 2006 (2006/54/EC) 2006
  3. Merkley J Equality Act of 2017 2017
  4. Celler E Civil Rights Act of 1964 1964
  5. Lakhan SE Diversification of U.S. medical schools via affirmative action implementation BMC Med Educ 2003 10.1186/1472-6920-3-6
  6. Mathers J Sitch A Marsh JL Parry J Widening access to medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: population based cross sectional analysis of UK data, 2002–6 BMJ 2011 342 d918 d918 10.1136/bmj.d918
  7. Woolf K Rich A Viney R Needleman S Griffin A Perceived causes of differential attainment in UK postgraduate medical training: a national qualitative study BMJ 2016 6 e013429 Open
  8. Flesch R A new readability yardstick J Appl Psychol 1948 32 221 233 10.1037/h0057532
  9. Kincaid JP Fishburne RP Rogers RL Chissom BS Millington TN Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel Naval Technical Training 1975 Memphis U. S. Naval Air Station 8 75
  10. Ferguson E James D Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature BMJ 2002 324 952 957 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952
  11. Babarudeen S Sabharwal S Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics Clin Orthop 2010 468 2572 2580 10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y
  12. Larson E Foe G Lally R Reading level and length of written research consent forms Clin Trans Sci 2015 8 355 356 10.1111/cts.12253
  13. Janan D Wray D Reassessing the accuracy and use of readability formulae Malaysian J Learn Instr 2014 11 127 145
  14. Crossley SA Allen DB McNamara DS Text readability and intuitive simplification: a comparison of readability formulas Read Foreign Lang 2011 23 84 101
  15. Feng L Jansche M Huenerfauth M Elhahad N A comparison of features for automatic readability assessment. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters 2010 276 284
  16. Mailloux SL Johnson ME Fisher DG Pettibone TJ How reliable is computerized assessment of reliability? Comput Nurs 1995 13 221 225
  17. Michalke M koRpus – ein R‑paket zur textanalyse. Paper presented at the Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP) 2012
  18. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2015 Wien The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  19. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2018. https://www.r-project.org/..
  20. Microsoft Corporation Test your document’s readability 2018
  21. Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Office Word 2016 MSO 16.0.4639.1000, 32-bit 2016
  22. Gierl MJ Lai H Turner SR Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items Med Educ 2012 46 757 765 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x
Language: English
Published on: Oct 23, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Daniel Zahra, Steven A. Burr, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.