Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Getting with the times: a narrative review of the literature on group decision making in virtual environments and implications for promotions committees Cover

Getting with the times: a narrative review of the literature on group decision making in virtual environments and implications for promotions committees

Open Access
|May 2018

References

  1. 1.
    Caverzagie KJ Nousiainen MT Ferguson PC Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education Med Teach 2017 39 588 593 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315075
  2. 2.
    Holmboe ES Sherbino J Long DM Swing SR Frank JR International CBME Collaborators The role of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2010 32 676 682 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500704
  3. 3.
    Andolsek K, Padmore J, Hauer KE, Holmboe E. Clinical competency committees: a guidebook for programs 2015 Available from: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/ACGMEClinicalCompetencyCommitteeGuidebook.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2018.
  4. 4.
    Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence committees n.d. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/assessment/competence-committees-e. Accessed January 2, 2018.
  5. 5.
    UK Foundation Programme Foundation annual review of competence progression (ARCP) 2017
  6. 6.
    Donato AA Alweis R Wenderoth S Design of a clinical competency committee to maximize formative feedback J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2016 6 6 33533 10.3402/jchimp.v6.33533
  7. 7.
    Hauer KE ten Cate O Boscardin CK Ensuring resident competence: a narrative review of the literature on group decision making to inform the work of clinical competency committees J Grad Med Educ 2016 8 156 164 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00144.1
  8. 8.
    Curşeu PL Schalk R Wessel I How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management J Manage. Psychol. 2008 23 628 652 10.1108/02683940810894729
  9. 9.
    Munro AJ Swartzman S What is a virtual multidisciplinary team (vMDT)? Br J Cancer 2013 108 2433 2441 10.1038/bjc.2013.231
  10. 10.
    Acai A, Cupido N, Weavers A, Sonnadara RR. Ready or not, here they come: early perceptions and experiences of competence committee implementation at a Canadian postgraduate medical training centre. In press 2018.
  11. 11.
    Green EP Gruppuso PA Justice and care: decision making by medical school student promotions committees Med Educ 2017 51 621 632 10.1111/medu.13280
  12. 12.
    Grant MJ Booth A A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies Health Info Libr J 2009 26 91 108 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  13. 13.
    Green BN Johnson CD Adams A Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade J Chiropr Med 2006 5 3 101 117 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
  14. 14.
    Lepsinger R DeRosa D Virtual team success: a practical guide for working and leading from a distance 2010 San Francisco Jossey-Bass
  15. 15.
    Maruping LA Agarwal R Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective J Appl Psychol 2004 89 975 990 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975
  16. 16.
    Hackman JR Leading teams: setting the stage for great performances 2002 Boston Harvard Business Review Press
  17. 17.
    Fuller RM Vician CM Brown SA Longitudinal effects of computer-mediated communication anxiety on interaction in virtual teams IEEE Pro Commun. 2016 59 166 185 10.1109/TPC.2016.2583318
  18. 18.
    Garrison G Wakefield RL Xu XB Kim SH Globally distributed teams: the effect of diversity on trust, cohesion and individual performance Data Base Adv Inf Syst 2010 41 27 48 10.1145/1851175.1851178
  19. 19.
    Stasser G A primer of social decision scheme theory: models of group influence, competitive model-testing, and prospective modeling Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1999 80 3 20 10.1006/obhd.1999.2851
  20. 20.
    Dennis AR Fuller RM Valacich JS Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity Manag Inf Syst Q 2008 32 575 600 10.2307/25148857
  21. 21.
    Dennis AR Wixom BH Vanderberg RJ Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis Manag Inf Syst Q 2001 25 167 193 10.2307/3250928
  22. 22.
    Alnuaimi OA Robert LP Maruping LM Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: a perspective on the theory of moral disengagement J Manag Inf Syst 2010 27 203 230 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270109
  23. 23.
    Baltes BB Dickson MW Sherman MP Bauer CC LaGanke JS Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: a meta-analysis Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2002 87 156 179 10.1006/obhd.2001.2961
  24. 24.
    Lu L Yuan YC McLeod PL Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2012 16 54 75 10.1177/1088868311417243
  25. 25.
    Chidambaram L Tung LL Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups Inf. Syst. Res. 2005 16 149 168 10.1287/isre.1050.0051
  26. 26.
    Minas RK Potter RF Denis AR Bartelt V Bae S Putting on the thinking cap: using NeuroIS to understand information processing biases in virtual teams J Manag Inf Syst 2014 30 49 82 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300403
  27. 27.
    Chahine S Cristancho S Padgett J Lingard L How do small groups make decisions? A theoretical framework to inform the implementation and study of clinical competency committees Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 192 198 10.1007/s40037-017-0357-x
  28. 28.
    Mohammed S Dumville BC Team mentals models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries J Organ Behav 2001 22 89 106 10.1002/job.86
  29. 29.
    Wegner DM A computer network model of human transactive memory Soc Cogn 1995 13 319 339 10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319
  30. 30.
    Peltokorpi V Transactive memory systems Rev Gen Psychol 2008 12 378 394 10.1037/1089-2680.12.4.378
  31. 31.
    Maynard MT Gilson LL The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness Group Org Manag 2014 39 3 32 10.1177/1059601113475361
  32. 32.
    Alavi M Tiwana A Knowledge integration in virtual teams: the potential role of KMS J Assoc Inf Sci Tech 2002 53 1029 1037 10.1002/asi.10107
  33. 33.
    Hollingshead AB Mcgrath JE O’Connor KM Group task performance and communication technology: a longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups Small Group Res 1993 24 307 333 10.1177/1046496493243003
  34. 34.
    Huber GP Lewis K Cross-understanding: implications for group cognition and performance Acad Manage Rev 2010 35 6 26
  35. 35.
    De Jong BA Dirks KT Gillespie N Trust and team performance: a meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates J Appl Psychol 2016 101 1134 1150 10.1037/apl0000110
  36. 36.
    Hambley LA O’Neill TA Kline TJB Virtual team leadership: the effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2007 103 1 20 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
  37. 37.
    Jehn KA Mannix EA The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance Acad Manage J 2001 44 238 251
  38. 38.
    Bell BS Kozlowski SWJ A typology of virtual teams: implications for effective leadership Group Org Manag 2002 27 14 49 10.1177/1059601102027001003
  39. 39.
    Martinez-Moreno E Zornoza A Orengo V Thompson LF The effects of team self-guided training on conflict management in virtual teams Group Decis Negot 2015 24 905 923 10.1007/s10726-014-9421-7
  40. 40.
    Hemmer PA Kelly WF We need to talk: clinical competency committees in the key of c(onversation) Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 141 143 10.1007/s40037-017-0360-2
  41. 41.
    Orlitzky M Hirokawa RY To err is human, to correct for it divine Small Group Res 2001 32 313 341 10.1177/104649640103200303
  42. 42.
    Lunenburg FC Devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry: antidotes to groupthink Int J Sch Acad Intellect Divers 2012 14 1 1 9
  43. 43.
    Swaab RI Galinsky AD Medvec V Diermeier DA The communication orientation model: explaining the diverse effects of sight, sound, and synchronicity on negotiation and group decision-making outcomes Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2012 16 25 53 10.1177/1088868311417186
  44. 44.
    Nonaka I Takeuchi H The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation 1995 New York Oxford University Press
  45. 45.
    Kennedy DM Vozdolska RR McComb SA Team decision making in computer-supported cooperative work: how initial computer-mediated or face-to-face meetings set the stage for later outcomes Decis Sci 2010 41 933 954 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00293.x
  46. 46.
    Kanawattanachai P Yoo Y The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time Manag Inf Syst Q 2007 31 783 808 10.2307/25148820
  47. 47.
    Hill NS Bartol KM Tesluk PE Langa GA Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groups Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2009 108 187 201 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.002
  48. 48.
    Majchrzak A Malhotra A Stamps J Lipnack J Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harv Bus Rev 2004 82 131 137
  49. 49.
    Paul S Samarah IM Seetharaman P Mykytyn PP An empirical investigation of collaborative conflict management style in group support system-based global virtual teams J Manag Inf Syst 2004 21 185 222 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045809
  50. 50.
    Paul S Seetharaman P Samarah I Mykytyn PP Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams Inf. Manage. 2004 41 303 321 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00076-4
  51. 51.
    Montoya-Weiss MM Massey AP Song M Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams Acad Manage J 2001 44 1251 1262
  52. 52.
    O’Neill TA Hoffart GC McLarnon MMJW Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and team functioning in student learning teams Acad Manag Learn Edu 2017 16 257 276 10.5465/amle.2015.0183
  53. 53.
    Lowry PB Nunamaker JF Curtis A Lowry MR The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams IEEE Pro Comm 2005 48 341 364 10.1109/TPC.2005.859728
  54. 54.
    Ellwart T Happ C Gurtner A Rack O Managing information overload in virtual teams: effects of a structured online team adaptation on cognition and performance Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2015 24 812 826 10.1080/1359432X.2014.1000873
  55. 55.
    Penarroja V Orengo V Zornoza A Sanchez J Ripoll P How team feedback and team trust influence information processing and learning in virtual teams: a moderated mediation model Comput Human Behav 2015 48 9 16 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.034
  56. 56.
    Konradt U Schippers MC Garbers Y Steenfatt C Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: the role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2015 24 777 795 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608
  57. 57.
    O’Neill TA Lewis RJ Hambley LA Beyerlein S Bradley L Beyerlein MM Nemiro J Leading virtual teams: potential problems and simple solutions The handbook of high performance virtual teams: a toolkit for collaborating across boundaries 2008 San Francisco Jossey-Bass 213 238
  58. 58.
    Varty CT O’Neill TA Hambley LA Blount Y Gloet M Leading anywhere workers: a scientific and practical framework Anywhere working and the new era of telecommuting 2017 Hershey IGI Global 47 88 10.4018/978-1-5225-2328-4.ch003
  59. 59.
    Hambley LA O’Neill TA Kline TJB Virtual team leadership: perspectives from the field Int J E Collab 2007 3 40 64 10.4018/jec.2007010103
  60. 60.
    Muethel M Hoegl M Cattani G Ferriani S Frederiksen L Taube F Shared leadership functions in geographically dispersed project teams Project-based organizing and strategic management. Advances in strategic management 2011 Bingley Emerald Group Publishing 289 321
  61. 61.
    Drescher G Garbers Y Shared leadership and commonality: a policy-capturing study Leaders Q 2016 27 200 217 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.002
  62. 62.
    Hoch JE Kozlowski SWJ Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership J Appl Psychol 2014 99 390 403 10.1037/a0030264
  63. 63.
    Hoegl M Muethel M Enabling shared leadership in virtual project teams: a practitioners’ guide Proj Manag J 2016 47 7 12 10.1002/pmj.21564
  64. 64.
    Johnson SD Suriya C Yoon SW Berrett JV La Fleur J Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams Comput Educ 2002 39 379 393 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00074-X
  65. 65.
    Tuckman BW Developmental sequence in small groups Psychol Bull 1965 63 384 399 10.1037/h0022100
  66. 66.
    Mittleman DD Briggs RO Nunamaker JF Best practices in facilitating virtual meetings: some notes from initial experiences Group Facil 2000 2 5 14
  67. 67.
    Clawson VK Bostrom RP Anson R The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings Small Group Res 1993 24 547 565 10.1177/1046496493244007
  68. 68.
    Friedman KA Raimo J Spielmann K Chaudry S Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators Med Educ Online 2016 21 29838 10.3402/meo.v21.29838
Language: English
Published on: May 24, 2018
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Anita Acai, Ranil R. Sonnadara, Thomas A. O’Neill, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.