Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cognitive load predicts point-of-care ultrasound simulator performance Cover

Cognitive load predicts point-of-care ultrasound simulator performance

Open Access
|Jan 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of study participants

Demographic variable

Experienced

(n = 8)

mean ± SD

Novice

(n = 21)

mean ± SD

t-test comparisons

Effect size

t

df

p-value

d

95% CI

Level of traininga

2.75 ± 0.46

1.62 ± 0.87

−3.49

27

<0.01

1.45

0.55 to 2.35

Prior ultrasound trainingb

2.25 ± 0.71

1.71 ± 0.64

−1.95

27

0.06

0.81

−0.03 to 1.65

Prior clinical point-of-care ultrasound procedures

 107 ± 94

  12 ± 11

−2.83

7.07d

0.03

0.99

0.13 to 1.84

Prior simulator exposurec

0.75 ± 0.46

0.43 ± 0.51

−1.63

13.85d

0.13

0.66

−0.18 to 1.49

SD standard deviation, df degrees of freedom, d effect size (Cohen’s d), CI confidence interval

a 0 medical student, 1 junior resident, 2 senior resident, 3 staff physician

b 0 none, 1 informal, 2 brief, 3 extensive

c 0 no, 1 yes

d df corrected to account for unequal variances

Fig. 1

Comparisons of experienced and novice performance in: a ultrasound image acquisition; b ultrasound image interpretation. Scenarios: 1 right kidney, 2 large pericardial effusion, 3 fluid in Morison’s pouch, 4 moderate pleural effusion. Notes: Scenarios are ordered here according to expected difficulty, but were completed in a different order by participants. The y‑axes depict the full range of possible performance scores

40037_2017_392_Fig1_HTML.gif

Fig. 2

Relationships between cognitive load rating (Paas scale) and image acquisition performance for: a Novice participants (n = 21); b Experienced participants (n = 8)

40037_2017_392_Fig2_HTML.gif

Table 2

Parameter estimates for marginal model with ultrasound image acquisition as the dependent variable and prior ultrasound training and cognitive load (Paas scale rating) as predictor variables

Fixed effect

B (SE)

df

t-value

p-value

95% CI

Intercept

1.50 (0.27)

113

5.64

<0.01

0.97 to 2.02

Prior ultrasound traininga

0.22 (0.10)

113

2.34

0.02

0.03 to 0.42

Cognitive loadb

−0.14 (0.03)

113

−4.05

<0.01

−0.21 to −0.07

Covariance parameter

V (SE)

Wald Z

p-value

Repeated measures

0.48 (0.06)

7.52

<0.01

B regression coefficient, SE standard error, df degrees of freedom, CI confidence interval, V covariance

a 0 none, 1 informal, 2 brief, 3 extensive

b range 1–9

Language: English
Published on: Jan 5, 2018
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Sara Aldekhyl, Rodrigo B. Cavalcanti, Laura M. Naismith, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.