Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Science: the slow march of accumulating evidence Cover

Science: the slow march of accumulating evidence

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. Crandall CS Sherman JW On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress J Exp Soc Psychol 2015
  2. Ioannidis JP Why most published research findings are false Plos Med 2005 2 e124 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
  3. Nosek BA Aarts A Anderson JE Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Science 2015
  4. Schmidt S Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in social sciences Rev Gen Psychol 2009 13 90 100 10.1037/a0015108
  5. Norman G Editorial – how bad is medical education research anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ 2007 12 1 5 10.1007/s10459-006-9047-x
  6. Eva KW Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research Med Educ 2009 43 294 296 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03342.x
  7. Larson DP Butler AC Roediger HL Test enhanced learning in medical education Med Educ 2008 42 959 966 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x
  8. Huffmeier J Mazei J Schultze T Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: a replication typology J Exp Soc Psychol 2015
  9. Earp BD Trafimow D Replication, falsification and the crisis of confidence in social psychology Front Psychol 2015 6 1 11 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621
  10. Klein SB What can recent replication failures tell us about theoretical commitments of psychology? Theory Psychol 2014 24 326 338 10.1177/0959354314529616
  11. Pashler H Harris CR Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined Perspect Psychol Sci 2012 7 531 536 10.1177/1745691612463401
Language: English
Published on: Oct 20, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Katherine Picho, Lauren A. Maggio, Anthony R. Artino Jr, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.