Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Summative peer marking? Cover
Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Steverding D, Tyler KM, Sexton DW. Evaluation of marking of peer-marking in oral presentation. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5.
  2. Andrade HG Teaching with rubrics: the good, the bad, and the ugly Coll Teach 2010 53 27 31 10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
  3. Falchikov N Goldfinch J Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks Rev Educ Res 2000 70 287 322 10.3102/00346543070003287
  4. Lindblom-Ylänne S Pihlajamäki H Kotkas T Self-, peer- and teacher-assessment of student essays Active Learn High Educ 2006 7 51 62 10.1177/1469787406061148
  5. Dunning D Johnson K Ehrlinger J Kruger J Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2003 12 83 87 10.1111/1467-8721.01235
  6. Hodges B Regehr G Martin D Difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence: novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it Acad Med 2001 76 S87 9 10.1097/00001888-200110001-00029
  7. Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D, Kruger D. Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University 2003, Ithaca, NY.
  8. Gale K Martin K McQueen G Triadic assessment Ass Eval High Educ 2002 27 557 567 10.1080/0260293022000020318
  9. Sluijsman D Brand-Gruwel S Merriënboer J Peer assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions Ass Eval High Educ 2002 27 443 454 10.1080/0260293022000009311
  10. Boud D Enhancing learning through self-assessment 1995 London Kogan Page
Language: English
Published on: Mar 8, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Lotte O’Neill, Anne Mette Morcke, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.