Have a personal or library account? Click to login
`Measuring cognitive load: mixed results from a handover simulation for medical students Cover

`Measuring cognitive load: mixed results from a handover simulation for medical students

Open Access
|Jan 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Cognitive Load Inventory for Handoffs (CLI4H)

Type of cognitive load

Items

Anchors for 0–10 Scale

0

10

Intrinsic load

Please rate the COMPLEXITY of the patient in this handoff

NOT at all complex

Extremely complex

Please rate the ACUTENESS of the patient in this handoff

Not at all acute

Highly acute

Please rate the AMOUNT OF CLINICAL INFORMATION that needed to be communicated during this handoff

Low amount of clinical information

High amount of clinical information

Please rate the CLINICAL DECISIONS that will have to be made after this handoff

Not at all complex

Highly complex, possibly depending on multiple pieces of interacting information.

Extraneous load

Please rate how well you understood the HANDOFF PROTOCOL that was used

Not at all

Completely

Please rate the ACCESSIBILITY of all the different information that needed to be communicated

Highly fragmented and difficulty to organize

Readily accessible and easy to organize

Please rate how much MENTAL EFFORT you invested to UNDERSTAND the TERMINOLOGY used in the handoff

Extremely low

Extremely high

Please rate how DISTRACTED you were during the handoff

Not at all

Very much

Germane load

Please rate how much this handoff improved YOUR UNDERSTANDING of how to perform a handoff?

Not at all

Very much

Table 2

Results of exploratory factor analysis of all items

Item

N

Mean

SD

Skewness

Kurtosis

Loading factor 1a

Loading factor 2a

Loading factor 3a

Intrinsic load: complexity

86

5.581

1.8261

− 0.168

− 0.343

0.532

− 0.077

0.429

Intrinsic load: acuity

86

7.221

1.7634

− 0.498

0.226

0.552

0.032

0.053

Intrinsic load: amount of clinical information

85

6.31

1.746

− 0.127

− 0.375

0.741

0.184

0.085

Intrinsic load: complexity of clinical decisions

86

6.186

2.3137

− 0.775

0.299

0.750

0.310

− 0.011

Extraneous load: protocol

86

5.372

2.8944

− 0.575

− 0.757

0.042

0.827

− 0.225

Extraneous load: accessibility of information

86

5.093

2.3992

− 0.567

− 0.064

0.104

0.318

0.080

Extraneous load: terminology

86

5.314

2.5449

− 0.401

− 0.285

0.127

0.127

0.733

Extraneous Load: distraction

85

2.52

2.767

1.059

0.127

− 0.308

− 0.176

0.290

Germane Load: understanding

85

4.08

2.803

− 0.035

− 1.034

0.133

0.764

0.083

aExtraction method: Principal axis factoring. Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization.

Table 3

Factor loadings for final model

Item

Factor

Intrinsic Load

Germane Load

Intrinsic load: complexity

0.50

0.08

Intrinsic load: acuity

0.65

− 0.08

Intrinsic load: amount of clinical information

0.69

0.33

Intrinsic load: complexity of clinical decisions

0.73

0.30

Germane load: understanding

0.09

0.78

Extraction method: principal axis factoring, Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization.

Table 4

Relationship of cognitive load factors to other variables

Variable

Intrinsic load factora

Germane load factorb

Paas single item measure of overall cognitive load

Pearson correlation coefficient

0.310 (N = 86, P = 0.004)

Pearson correlation coefficient

0.110 (N = 85, P = 0.32)

Student self-assessment of handoff’s success

Pearson correlation coefficient

0.129 (N = 85, P = 0.24)

Pearson correlation coefficient

0.303 (N = 85, P = 0.005)

Performance rating by standardized resident

Pearson correlation coefficient

− 0.140 (N = 85, P = 0.20)

Pearson correlation coefficient

0.107 (N = 84, P = 0.33)

Lowc versus highd handoff experience

T-test

Low (N = 52): M = 26.3 (SD = 5.3)

High (N = 34): M = 23.6 (SD = 6.3)

P = 0.036

T-test

Low (N = 52): M = 4.6 (SD = 2.4)

High (N = 33): M = 3.3 (SD = 3.2)

P = 0.03

aSum of four contributing factors—range 0–40.

bValue of one contributing factor—range 0–10.

cLow = prior experience with less than 5 handoffs.

dHigh = prior experience with 5 or more handoffs.

Language: English
Published on: Jan 12, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 John Q. Young, David M. Irby, Maria-Louise Barilla-LaBarca, Olle ten Cate, Patricia S. O’Sullivan, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.