Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A curriculum focused on informed empathy improves attitudes toward persons with disabilities Cover

A curriculum focused on informed empathy improves attitudes toward persons with disabilities

By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2013

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographics of student participants

Age (years)a

Female, no. (%) N = 74 (77.9)

Male, no. (%) N = 21 (22.1)

18–20

23 (31.1)

0 (.0)

21–25

49 (66.2)

17 (81.0)

26–30

1 (1.4)

4 (19.0)

41 and over

1 (1.4)

0 (.0)

Race/ethnicityb

 Asian/Asian-American

7 (9.6)

1 (4.8)

 Black/African-American

5 (6.8)

1 (4.8)

 Hispanic

4 (5.5)

0 (.0)

 White

54 (74.0)

18 (85.7)

 Otherc

3 (4.1)

1 (4.8)

Planning to be health care provider

N = 72 (78.3)

N = 20 (21.7)

 Yes

51 (70.8)

17 (85.0)

 No

14 (19.4)

2 (10.0)

 Maybe

7 (9.7)

1 (5.0)

Has a disabilityd

 No

73 (98.6)

20 (95.2)

 Yese

1 (1.4)

1 (4.8)

aAge distribution differs significantly by gender (Pearson X2 = 17.1, df = 3, p = .001)

bNo significant difference in distribution in ethnicity by gender

cIncludes two Multiple or Other, one Lebanese, one African American/Multiracial

dNo significant difference in disability by gender

cOne hearing impaired, one major depressive disorder

Table 2

Mean performance on attitude and empathy measures across courses

Survey

Mean of aggregated courses (95 % CI)

ANOVA across courses

Attitude toward Disabled Persons (ATDP)

79.01 (76.52–81.50)

F(6,88) = 1.72, p = .13

Attitude toward Patient Advocacy, Microsocial (AMIA)

225.19 (221.18–229.20)

F(6,87) = .27, p = .95

Empathy subscales

 Fantasy

17.55 (16.58–18.51)

F(6,88) = .94, p = .47

 Perspective taking

19.85 (19.13–20.57)

F(6,88) = .68, p = .67

 Empathic concern

22.08 (21.34–22.83)

F(6,88) = .38, p = .89

 Personal distress

10.52 (9.50–11.53)

F(6,88) = 1.40, p = .23

Table 3

Paired-t tests comparing the Attitudes toward Disabled Persons scale and Attitudes Toward Microsocial Advocacy scale scores

Scale

Pre-module mean

Post-module mean

t test equation

ATDP

79.01 (SD = 12.22)

85.56 (SD = 13.23)

t(94) = −5.95, p = .000

AMIA

225.15 (SD = 19.69)

233.70 (SD = 16.54)

t(92) = −5.99, p = .000

Language: English
Page range: 114 - 125
Published on: Mar 6, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2013 Sonya R. Miller, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.