Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of two different instructional formats on scores and reliability of a script concordance test Cover

Effects of two different instructional formats on scores and reliability of a script concordance test

Open Access
|Aug 2012

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Instructional example of the SCT questions with the two different formats as provided to the respective groups in this study

Case scenario

A mother of a 15-month-old boy visits your consulting hour because her son is crying all the time and has been agitated for two days now

Hypothesis: Constipation

Additional data: He is constantly tugging at his right ear

With this new additional data the hypothesis:

(Adapted instructions: ‘Take into account the differential diagnosis’)

(Standard instructions: ‘Consider other diagnoses as excluded’)

 • Becomes more likely

 • Is not influenced

 • Becomes less likely

For the groups with the adapted instructions the following was added: You may consider an inflammation of the ear as a likely diagnosis. As a consequence, the hypothesis ‘constipation’ will move to a lower position in your differential diagnosis. ‘Becomes less likely’ could therefore be your answer to this question

For the groups with the standard instructions the following was added: You may consider an inflammation of the ear as a likely diagnosis. However, do not take this diagnosis into account when answering the question. Constipation in itself does not become more or less likely by the tugging at an ear. ‘Is not influenced’ could therefore be your answer to this question

Table 2

Results for the SCT (for the students) with the two different instructions

Test with adapted instructions (include differential diagnosis when answering the questions)

Test with standard instructions (exclude other diagnoses when answering the questions)

p value

N = 29; 100 questions per test

N = 30; 100 questions per test

Mean score (SD)

81.50 (3.80)

82.94 (5.01)

p = 0.220 (independent Student’s t test)

Range: 5.76–100 test with adapted instructions, 5.92–100 test with standard instructions

73.18–89.10

70.12–92.08

Cronbach’s alpha

0.388

0.655

Mean number of confusion indications (SD)

4.17 (4.42)

16.70 (28.47)

Mann–Whitney test Z U  = −1,481 p = 0.139

Answer option ‘no influence’ chosen (% of all responses)

23.3 %

40.2 %

p < 0.001 (independent Student’s t test)

Language: English
Published on: Aug 21, 2012
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2012 W. E. Sjoukje van den Broek, Marianne V. van Asperen, Olle Th. J. ten Cate, Eug`ene Custers, Gerlof D. Valk, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.