Nukleonika

An article submitted for publication is subjected to a double-blind peer-review process participated by at least two reviewers. Article is sent to reviewers in an anonymous form (without names and other personal data of the authors). Reviewers also remain anonymous.

The review should be sent back to the editorial office within 21 days of receiving the article. If a reviewer is not capable of completing this task within such deadline, should inform the editorial office about it after accepting the invitation for reviewing the article.

Reviewers are asked to prepare a detailed review evaluating the content of the article. A reviewer evaluates selected aspects of reviewed articles: − If the subject matter of a manuscript is consistent with the profile of the journal; − Are the title and abstract clearly presented?; − Whether the article contains elements of innovation; − Has the present state of knowledge been sufficiently presented?; − Has the research material clearly been presented, have proper methods been used?; − Do the results justify the conclusions?; − Are the results of the study correctly presented and interpreted?; − Are the figures and tables necessary and clear enough?; − English.

Final conclusion – options: 1) accept without changes; 2) accept after minor changes suggested by reviewer; 3) reassessment of the manuscript after major changes suggested by the reviewer; 4) reject manuscript  Both acceptance and dismissal of a paper require justification. If a paper requires changes, a reviewer should indicate suggested corrections.

A corrected article will be sent to the same reviewer for revision (several revision are possible). The reviewer are asked to revise the article and send their recommendation concerning publication to the editorial office.