Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lawyers, Guns, and Money: The Impact of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on the Second Amendment and Gun-Control Cover

Lawyers, Guns, and Money: The Impact of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on the Second Amendment and Gun-Control

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Abstract

“A fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American Public,” is how former Chief Justice Warren Burger described the idea that the Second Amendment guarantees an inalienable right for Americans to own a firearm. That fraud, the former Chief Justice contended, was the creation of special interest groups. Over the past fifteen years, the amount of money invested in political campaigns has exploded to record levels as independent organizations have spent billions of dollars to advocate for or against certain candidates. At the same time, the rates of gun deaths and mass shootings in the United States have also sky rocketed. But Congress has passed very few pieces of legislation to curtail the possession of firearms, as pro-gun advocates assert that the Second Amendment is absolute. With pro-gun groups spending millions of dollars to support a candidate or political position, this Note argues that campaign finance reform may be one way to curtail gun violence in America.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70167/KVIZ2689 | Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 927 - 969
Published on: Mar 30, 2026
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 William Danforth, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.