Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures
References
- National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Dror, I. E. (2013). The ambition to be scientific: Human expert performance and objectivity. Science & Justice, Vol. 53 (2), pp. 81–82.
- Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (2020). The Definitions of HF/E. Retrieved from
https://www.hfes.org/resources/educational-and-professionalresources/new-item - Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. (2012). Latent print examination and human factors: Improving the practice through a systems approach. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- Expert Working Group for Human Factors in Handwriting Examination. (2020). Forensic handwriting examination and human factors: Improving the practice through a systems approach. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. doi:10.6028/NIST.IR.8282
- Dyer, A., Found, B., & Rogers, D. (2006). Visual attention and expertise for forensic signature analysis, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 51, pp. 1367–1404.
- Dyer, A., Found, B., and Rogers, D, (2008). An insight into forensic document examiner expertise for discriminating between forged and disguised signatures. Journal of Forensic Science, Vol. 53, pp. 1154–1159.
- Dyer, A., Found, B., Merlino, M. L., Pepe, A. L., Rogers, D. K., & Sita, J. (2014). Eye movement evaluation of signature forgeries: Insights to forensic expert evidence In M. E. Horsley, M. Eliot, B. Knight, & R. Reilly (Eds.), Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research (pp. 211–223).
- Tatler B. (2014). Eye Movements from Laboratory to Life. In M. E. Horsley, M. Eliot, B. Knight, & R. Reilly (Eds.), Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research (pp. 17–35).
- Mohammed, L., Found, B., & Rogers, D. (2008). Frequency of signatures styles in San Diego County, Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Vol. 1, pp. 9–13.
- Nguyen, D. M. T., Hammond, D. L., & Salyards, M. J. (2011). Signature frequency and classification in the military. In American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Annual Meeting 2011, Chicago, IL.
- Found, B., & Rogers, D. (1996).
The forensic examination of signature complexity . In M. L. Simmer, C. G. Leedham, & A. J. W. M. Thomassen (Eds.), Handwriting and Drawing Research: Basic Issues (pp.483–492). Amsterdam: IOs Press. - Found, B., & Rogers, D. (1998). A consideration of the theoretical basis of forensic handwriting examination. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners, Vol. 4, pp. 109–118.
- Dewhurst, T., Found, B., & Rogers, D. (2008). Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature? Forensic Science International, Vol. 180, pp. 50–53.
- Mohammed, L. A. (2019). Assessment of signature complexity. In L. Mohammed (Ed.), Forensic Examination of Signatures (pp. 31–42).
- Found, B., Rogers, D., Rowe, V., & Dick, D. (1998). Statistical modelling of experts’ perceptions of the ease of signature simulation. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, Vol. 11, pp. 75–102.
- Alewijnse, L. C., van den Heuvel, E. C., & Stoel, R. D. (2011). Analysis of signature complexity. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, Vol. 21, pp. 37–49.
- Jasanoff, S. (1993). What judges should know about the sociology of science. Judicature, Vol. 7, pp. 77–82.
- Caudill, D. S. (2001). Law and science: An essay on links and socio-natural hybrids. Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 51, pp. 841–862.
- Foulsham T. (2015). Eye movements and their functions in everyday tasks. Eye (London, England), Vol. 29, pp. 196–199.
- Dicks, M., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2010). Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 72, pp. 706–720.
- Hayhoe, M. M., McKinney, T., Chajka, K., & Pelz, J. B. (2011). Predictive eye movements in natural vision. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 217, pp. 125–136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.262 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 30
Published on: Jun 1, 2020
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2020 Mara L. Merlino, Veronica B. Dahir, Charles P. Edwards, Derek L. Hammond, Tierra Freeman-Taylor, Adrian Dyer, Bryan J. Found, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.