Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Laypersons’ Performance in the Determination of Authorship from a Homogenous Group Of Writers Cover

Laypersons’ Performance in the Determination of Authorship from a Homogenous Group Of Writers

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 US 579, 1993.
  2. U.S. Supreme Court ruling, United States v. Starzecpyzel, 880 F. Supp. 1027 (S.D.N.Y.) 1995.
  3. U.S. Supreme Court ruling, General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 76 F. 3d., 524, 1997.
  4. U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Kumho Tire Co. v. Patrick Carmichael, 131 F 3d 1443, 1999.
  5. Saks, M., Denbeaux, M., and Risinger, M. (1989) Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification “Expertise”, Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 137, No. 3, pp. 731792.
  6. Risinger, D. M., and Saks, M. (1996) Science and NonScience in the Courts: Daubert Meets Handwriting Identification Expertise, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 82, pp. 2174.
  7. Kam, M., Wetstein, J., and Conn, R. (1994). Proficiency of Professional Document Examiners in Writer Identification, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 39, pp. 514.
  8. Kam, M., Fielding, G., and Conn, R. (1997) Writer Identification by Professional Document Examiners, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 42, pp. 778786.
  9. Kam, M., Fielding, G., and Conn, R. (1998) Effects of Monetary Incentives on Performance of Non-Professionals in Document Examination Proficiency Tests, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 43, pp. 10001004.
  10. Kam, M., Gummadidala, K., Fielding, G., and Conn, R. (2001) Signature Authentication by Forensic Document Examiners, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 46, pp. 884888.
  11. Found, B., Sita J., Rogers D. (1999) The development of a program for characterising forensic handwriting examiners’ expertise: signature examination pilot study, Journal of Forensic Document Examination, Vol. 12, pp. 6980.
  12. Sita, J., Found, B., and Rogers D.K. (2002) Forensic Handwriting Examiners’ Expertise for Signature Comparison, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 5; pp. 11171124.
  13. Bird, C., Found, B., and Rogers D.K. (2010) Forensic Document Examiners’ Skill in Distinguishing Between Natural and Disguised Handwriting Behaviors, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol.55, No. 5; pp. 12911295.
  14. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council, ISBN: 0-309-13131-6, (2009), PDF available electronically from National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589.html
  15. Ibid.
  16. Scientific Working Group for Document Examination, Published Standards, Available from SWGDOC.org at http://www.SWGDOC.org/index.php/Standards/published-standards.
  17. Vargas, R. (2008) Standards for Questioned Document Examination: Preparing Document Examiners for the Judicial System of the 21st Century, ASTM Standardization News, November/December 2008, pp. 5155.
  18. Merlino, M. (2015) Validity, Reliability, Accuracy, and Bias in Forensic Signature Identification, Document No. 248565, pp. 11470, PDF available electronically from NCJRS at http://www.NCJRS.gov/app/publication/abstract/aspx?ID#270668
  19. Kam, M., Abichandani, P., and Hewett, T (2015) Simulation Detection in Handwritten Documents by Forensic Document Examiners, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 60, pp. 936941.
  20. Srihari, S., Cha, S., Arora, H. and Lee, S. (2002) Individuality of Handwriting, Journal of Forensic Science, Vol. 47, No. 4; pp. 856872.
  21. Durina, M. and Caligiuri, M. (2009) The Determination of Authorship from a Homogenous Group of Writers, Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Inc., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 7789.
  22. Ibid.
  23. Ibid.
  24. Ibid.
  25. Merlino, M. (2015) Validity, Reliability, Accuracy, and Bias in Forensic Signature Identification, Document No. 248565, p. 1424, PDF available electronically from NCJRS at http://www.NCJRS.gov/app/publication/abstract/aspx?ID#270668
  26. Saks (2003) Commentary on: Srihari, S., Cha, S., Arora, H. and Lee, S. (2002) Individuality of Handwriting, Journal of Forensic Science, 47(4), 856872.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.234 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 38
Published on: Dec 1, 2016
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Marie E. Durina, Michael P. Caligiuri, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.