Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigating Forensic Document Examiner Opinions on Signatures in aForeign Script Cover

Investigating Forensic Document Examiner Opinions on Signatures in aForeign Script

Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. Al-Musa Alkahtani, A (2010) The Ability of Forensic Handwriting Examiners to Judge the Quality of Signature Simulations in an Unfamiliar Writing System. JASQDE, 13 No 2.
  2. Al-Musa Alkahtani, A (2014) Arabic-Illiterate Forensic Handwriting Analysis: A Pilot Study to Further Investigate the Ability of Arabic-Illiterate Examiners to Judge the Accuracy of Simulations of Arabic Signatures, Compared with Arabic-Literate Examiners. JASQDE, 17 No 1.
  3. Brewester F (1932) Contested Documents and Forgeries. The Book Company Ltd, Calcutta.
  4. Cheng Y (2011) An overview of Radicals in Chinese Characters Part II—A study on the writing of radicals of similar structures. Proceedings of the ASQDE Annual Conference, Victoria BC.
  5. Coulmas F (1999) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Blackwell Publishing)
  6. Crown D and Shimaoka T (1974) The Examination of Ideographic Handwriting. Journal of Police Science and Administration, Northwestern University School of Law.
  7. Dawson GA and Lindblom BS (1998) An evaluation of line quality in photocopied signatures. Science & Justice 38(3) 189194.
  8. Desjardins R (2012) The Effects of Constraint on the Static and Dynamic Features of Handwriting. University of Ontario Institute of Technology B.Sc (Hons) thesis.
  9. Dewhurst T, Found B and Rogers D (2008) Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature? Forensic Sciences International 180 (1) 5053.
  10. Fazio K (2011) The Effects of Constraint on a Signature’s Static and Dynamic Features. University of Ontario Institute of Technology B.Sc (Hons) thesis.
  11. Johnston Y (2012) Understanding the Chinese Writing System 101. Proceedings of the ASQDE Annual Conference, Charleston.
  12. Kam M, Fielding G & Conn R (1997) Writer identification by professional document examiners. Journal of Forensic Sciences 42 (5) 778786.
  13. Kam M, Gummadidala M, Fielding G and Conn R (2001) Signature authentication by forensic document examiners. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46 (4) 884888.
  14. Kam M, Gorski A and Gaughan C (2003) A Decade of Writer Identification Proficiency Tests for Forensic Document Examiners. Proceedings of the ASQDE Annual Conference, Baltimore.
  15. Leung1 S, Cheng Y, Fung H and Poon N (1993) Forgery I – Simulation; Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2: 402412.
  16. Leung2 S, Fung H, Cheng Y and Poon N (1993) Forgery II – Tracing; Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2: 413424.
  17. Masson J F (2012) SCANNED IMAGES: How Well Do They Depict the Subtle features in Handwriting? JASQDE, 15 No 1.
  18. Mittal S & Sehgal V (1989) Forensic Examination of Unfamiliar Scripts, International Criminal Police Review, No. 418, pp 1115.
  19. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. National Academies Press, 2009.
  20. Ostrum, R (2013) Error, Confidence and (Un) certainty—Deconstructing Authorship Opinions Using a Forced Call Testing Protocol. Proceedings of National Institute of Standards and Technology Measurement Science and Standards in Forensic Handwriting Analysis Conference, Gaithersburg, ML.
  21. Simsons D, Spencer R and Auer S (2011) The Effects of Constraining Signatures. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners Vol. 14, no.1.
  22. Sita J, Found B and Rogers D (2002) Forensic handwriting examiners’ expertise for signature comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47:1117.
  23. Wilder D and Ingram J (1974) Analysis of Chinese Characters, Dover Publications Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.208 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 38
Published on: Dec 1, 2014
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 Rosalind Spencer, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.