Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Machine Learning for Estimation of Dynamic Model Parameters of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Review for 2015-2025 Period Cover

Machine Learning for Estimation of Dynamic Model Parameters of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Review for 2015-2025 Period

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Hassani V, Surensen A.J. Pascoal A.M. Athans M. Robust Dynamic Positioning of Offshore Vessels Using Mixed-!!!x1D707; Synthesis Modeling, Design and Practice. Ocean Engineering. 2017; 129: 389–400.
  2. Simetti E, Wanderlingh F, Torelli S, Bibuli M, Odetti A, Bruzzone G, Rizzini DL, Aleotti J, Palli G, Moriello L, Scarcia, U. Autonomous Underwater İntervention: Experimental Results of The MARIS Project. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2018; 43 (3): 620–639.
  3. Zereik E, Bibuli M, Miskovic N, Ridao P, Pascoal A. Challenges and future trends in marine robotics. Annu Rev Control. 2018;46:350–368.
  4. Zhang Q, Zhang J, Chemori A, Xiang X. Virtual submerged floating operational system for robotic manipulation. Complexity. 2018;9528313. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9528313
  5. Qin H, Chen H, Sun Y, Chen L. Distributed finite-time fault-tolerant containment control for multiple ocean bottom flying node systems with error constraints. Ocean Eng. 2019;189:106341.
  6. Xiang X, Yu C, Lapierre L, Zhang J, Zhang Q. Survey on fuzzy-logic-based guidance and control of marine surface vehicles and underwater vehicles. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2018;20(2):572–586.
  7. Peng Z, Wang J, Wang D, Han QL. An overview of recent advances in coordinated control of multiple autonomous surface vehicles. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2021;17(2):732–745.
  8. Qin H, Li C, Sun Y, Li X, Du Y, Deng Z. Finite-time trajectory tracking control of unmanned surface vessel with error constraints and input saturations. J Franklin Inst. 2020;357(16):11472–11495.
  9. Karimi HR, Lu Y. Guidance and control methodologies for marine vehicles: A survey. Control Eng Pract. 2021;111:104785.
  10. Wang Z, Yang S, Xiang X, Vasilijevic A, Miskovic N, Nad D. Cloud-based mission control of USV fleet: Architecture, implementation and experiments. Control Eng Pract. 2021;106:104657.
  11. Gu N, Wang D, Peng Z, Wang J, Han QL. Advances in line-of-sight guidance for path following of autonomous marine vehicles: An overview. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2022;1–17.
  12. Zhang J, Xiang X, Zhang Q, Li W. Neural network-based adaptive trajectory tracking control of underactuated AUVs with unknown asymmetrical actuator saturation and unknown dynamics. Ocean Eng. 2020;218:108193.
  13. Anon; 2019. https://sea-technology.com/hydroid-seaglider
  14. Ton A, Lee M, Vos S, Gawehn M, den Heijer K, Aarninkhof S. Beach and nearshore monitoring techniques. In: Sandy Beach Morphodynamics. Elsevier; 2020; 659–687.
  15. Fossen TI. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles. New York. USA. Wiley; 1994.
  16. Dinc M, Hajiyev C. Integrated navigation system applied to dynamic modeling of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. In: Proc 19th Saint Petersburg Int Conf Integrated Navigation Systems (ICINS). 2012; 272–278.
  17. Wang J, Wang C, Wei Y, Zhang C. Command filter based adaptive neural trajectory tracking control of an underactuated underwater vehicle in three-dimensional space. Ocean Eng. 2019;180:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.061
  18. Lima GS, Lizárraga F, Alam M, Poignet P. Sliding mode control with Gaussian process regression for underwater robotic vehicles. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 2020;17(5):1–12.
  19. Imam F, Musilek P, Reformat MZ. Parametric and nonparametric machine learning techniques for increasing power system reliability: A review. Information. 2024;15(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010037.
  20. Zhao J. Neural network predictive control for autonomous underwater vehicle with input delay. J Control Sci Eng. 2018;2018:2316957.
  21. Elhaki O, Shojaei K. Neural network-based target tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with a prescribed performance. Ocean Eng. 2018;167:239–256.
  22. Shojaei K. Neural network feedback linearization target tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with a guaranteed performance. Ocean Eng. 2022;258:111827.
  23. Park BS. Neural network-based tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with model uncertainties. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2015;137(2):021004.
  24. Ertogan M. Modelling using neural networks and dynamic position control for AUVs. Journal of ETA Maritime Science. 2024;12(1): 64-73.
  25. Wang B, Huang L, Liu J, Deng Z, Fu M. A support vector regression-based integrated navigation method for underwater vehicles. IEEE Sens J. 2020;20(15):8875–8883.
  26. Thanh PNN, Anh HPH. Neural network-based depth and horizontal control for autonomous underwater vehicles with prescribed performance. Ocean Eng. 2023;281:114647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114647
  27. Wehbe B, Krell MM. Learning coupled dynamic models of underwater vehicles using support vector regression. In: OCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen. 2017; 1–7.
  28. Liu T, Smith J, et al. A Gaussian-process-based model predictive control for autonomous underwater vehicles. J Mar Sci Eng. 2024;12(4):676.
  29. Liu W, Xu J, Li L, Zhang K, Zhang H. Adaptive model predictive control for underwater manipulators using Gaussian process regression. J Mar Sci Eng. 2023;11(9):1641.
  30. Ahmed F, Xiang XB, Jiang CC, Xiang G, Yang SL. Survey on traditional and AI based estimation techniques for hydrodynamic coefficients of autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng. 2023;268:113300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113300
  31. Ramirez WA, Kocijan J, Leong Z, Nguyen H, Jayasinghe SG. Dynamic system identification of underwater vehicles using multi-output Gaussian processes. Int J Autom Comput. 2021;18(5):681–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-021-1308-x
  32. He Y, Zhao Y, Xu G, Deng X. Gaussian process based robust trajectory tracking of autonomous underwater vehicle. In: 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC). 2021; 2862–2867.
  33. Thompson R. Probabilistic modeling of underwater currents using MOGP. IEEE J Ocean Eng. 2023;48(2):312–325.
  34. Chen H et al. Quantitative comparison of MOGP and BNN in underwater navigation. Mar Struct. 2022;84:103215.
  35. Chen Z, Liu P. PINN-AUV: a physics-informed approach for estimating hydrodynamic parameters. Mar Struct. 2024;92:103–118.
  36. Raissi M et al. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys. 2019;378:686–707.
  37. Raissi M. Stiffness issues in training physics-informed neural networks. J Comput Phys. 2021;420:109–125.
  38. Sun H et al. Adaptive sampling strategies for PINNs in underwater hydrodynamics. Neurocomputing. 2024;580:127–142.
  39. Martinez J et al. Deep reinforcement learning for real-time hydrodynamic parameter identification. Robot Auton Syst. 2024;162:104–119.
  40. Chu F, Li H, Xie L, Zhao J. A survey of transformer architectures for autonomous driving. Expert Syst Appl. 2026;299:130338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130338.
  41. Smith A, Taylor B. Interpretability of machine learning models in marine robotics: an XAI approach. Artif Intell Rev. 2024;57(2):45–67.
  42. Fossen TI. Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. 2nd ed. Hoboken. NJ USA: Wiley; 2021.
  43. Lin L, Chen Y, Xiong H, Yu C, Zhu H, Xing Y, Zheng G. Hydrodynamics model identification and model-based control application of a new type of AUV. J Mar Sci Eng. 2025;13(2):310.
  44. Wehbe B, Fabisch A, Krell MM. Online model identification for underwater vehicles through incremental support vector regression. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2017; 4173–4180.
  45. Xu F, Zou ZJ, Yin JC, Cao J. Identification modeling of underwater vehicles’ nonlinear dynamics based on support vector machines. Ocean Eng. 2013;67:68–76.
  46. Zhu M, Wen Y, Sun W, Wu B. A novel adaptive weighted least square support vector regression algorithm-based identification of the ship dynamic model. IEEE Access. 2019;7:128910–128924.
  47. Macatangay X, Gabriel SA, Hoseinnezhad R, Fowler A, Bab-Hadiashar A. Machine learning for modeling underwater vehicle dynamics: overview and insights. IEEE Access. 2024;12:139486–139504.
  48. Vasudev KL, Pandey M, Pu JH. A comparative study on hydrodynamic optimization approaches for AUV design using CFD. Fluid Dyn Mater Process. 2025;21(7):1545.
  49. Wehbe B, Krell MM. Learning coupled dynamic models of underwater vehicles using support vector regression. In: Oceans 2017-Aberdeen. IEEE. 2017; 1–7.
  50. Li C, Guo S. Characteristic evaluation via multi-sensor information fusion strategy for spherical underwater robots. Inf Fusion. 2023;95:199–214.
  51. Demiroglu Y, Kaya BB. A system identification study of an autonomous underwater vehicle by using multi-fidelity surrogate modeling. Science and Technology Organization (STO). 2023; 1-17.
  52. Luo W, Guo X, Dai J, Rao T. Hull optimization of an underwater vehicle based on dynamic surrogate model. Ocean Eng. 2021;230:109050.
  53. Abdessemed F. SVM-based control system for a robot manipulator. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 2012;9(6):247.
  54. Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw. 2015;61:85–117.
  55. Yan J, Yang X, Zhao H, Luo X, Guan X. Autonomous underwater vehicles: Localization, tracking, and formation. Cham: Springer Nature; 2021.
  56. Yari E, Ayoobi A, Ghassemi H. Applying the artificial neural network to estimate the drag force for an autonomous underwater vehicle. Open J Fluid Dyn. 2015;4:334–46. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2014.43025
  57. Islam M, Mills J, Gash R, Pearson W. A literature survey of broken ice-structure interaction modelling methods for ships and offshore platforms. Ocean Eng. 2021;221:108527.
  58. Song YS, Arshad MR. Thruster modeling for a hovering autonomous underwater vehicle considering thruster-thruster and thruster-hull interaction. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Underwater System Technology: Theory and Applications (USYS). 2016; 100–4.
  59. Kim S, Kim J. Neural-network-based adaptive control for trajectory tracking of AUVs with model uncertainties. J Mar Sci Technol. 2023;28(3):415–428.
  60. Qiao L, Zhang R. Transfer learning for hydrodynamic parameter estimation of AUVs: a deep learning approach. Appl Ocean Res. 2024;142:103820.
  61. Ramirez WA. Gaussian processes applied to system identification, navigation and control of underwater vehicles [dissertation]. Hobart. TAS. Australia: University of Tasmania; 2019.
  62. Zhang Z, Xu L, Duan X, Bai L. Non-parametric dynamics modeling for autonomous underwater vehicle using Gaussian process learning network. In: 2025 44th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). 2025; 1373–9.
  63. Hong Z, Wang X, Li M, Gu Y, Zhao J, Cao X. Identification of USV maneuvering model based on multi-output Gaussian process regression. In: 2023 China Automation Congress (CAC). 2023; 6300–5.
  64. Ramirez WA, Kocijan J, Leong ZQ, Nguyen HD, Jayasinghe SG. Dynamic system identification of underwater vehicles using multi-output Gaussian processes. Int J Autom Comput. 2021;18(5): 681–93.
  65. Ortega-Vela JA, Muñoz-Gutiérrez PA, Vargas-Cardona HD. Multi-output Gaussian processes applied to modeling and reducing dimensionality of data transmitted in a wireless sensor network. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioquia. 2025;34(71).
  66. Stiasny J, Misyris GS, Chatzivasileiadis S. Physics-informed neural networks for non-linear system identification for power system dynamics. In: 2021 IEEE Madrid PowerTech. Madrid. Spain. 2021; 1–6.
  67. Zhao Y, Hu Z, Du W, Geng L, Yang Y. Research on modeling method of autonomous underwater vehicle based on a physics-informed neural network. J Mar Sci Eng. 2024;12(5):801.
  68. Zhao Y, Hu Z, Geng L, Zhang S, Li X. Physics-informed AUV modeling method and application under current disturbances. In: 2024 6th International Conference on Robotics and Computer Vision (ICRCV). 2024; 226–31.
  69. Liu A, Xue Y, Qin H, Zhu Z. Physics-informed identification of marine vehicle dynamics using hydrodynamic dictionary library-inspired adaptive regression. Ocean Eng. 2024;296:117013.
  70. Liu J, Yu F, Yan T, He B, Soares CG. CFD-driven physics-informed generative adversarial networks for predicting AUV hydrodynamic performance. Ocean Eng. 2024;313:119638.
  71. Alatabani LE, Saeed RA. XAI applications in autonomous vehicles. In: Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Vehicles. Boca Raton. FL USA: CRC Press. 2024; 73–99.
  72. Gunning D, Stefik M, Choi J, Miller T, Stumpf S, Yang GZ. XAI— Explainable artificial intelligence. Sci Robot. 2019;4(37):eaay7120.
  73. Vennerød CB, Kjærran A, Bugge ES. Long short-term memory RNN. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2105.06756; 2021.
  74. Lv PF, He B, Guo J. Position correction model based on gated hybrid RNN for AUV navigation. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2021;70(6):5648–57.
  75. Chavez AG, Mueller CA, Birk A, Babic A, Miskovic N. Stereo-vision based diver pose estimation using LSTM recurrent neural networks for AUV navigation guidance. In: OCEANS 2017-Aberdeen. Aberdeen. Scotland; 2017:1–7.
  76. DiPietro R, Hager GD. Deep learning: RNNs and LSTM. In: Handbook of medical image computing and computer assisted intervention. Cambridge MA. USA: Academic Press. 2020; 503–19.
  77. Wang D, Wan J, Shen Y, Qin P, He B. Hyperparameter optimization for the LSTM method of AUV model identification based on Q-learning. J Mar Sci Eng. 2022;10(8):1002.
  78. Çifçi OS. Transformer (dönüştürücü) mimarisi kullanarak zaman serilerinde anomali tespiti. Bozok J Eng Arch. 2023;2(1):1–7.
  79. Wang J. A tutorial on LLM reasoning: Relevant methods behind ChatGPT O1. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2502.10867; 2025.
  80. Chen X, Qu G, Tang Y, Low S, Li N. Reinforcement learning for decision-making and control in power systems: Tutorial, review, and vision; 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65731/ama/2026-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 343 - 354
Submitted on: Dec 19, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2026
Published on: Jul 16, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Gülten Yilmaz, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.