Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of tactile stimulation on the level of consciousness and vital signs of patients with traumatic brain injury: a quasi- experimental study Cover

Effect of tactile stimulation on the level of consciousness and vital signs of patients with traumatic brain injury: a quasi- experimental study

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Description of the intervention provided to the experimental and control group

GroupDescription
ExperimentalControl
Step-1
Enrolment
Step-1
Enrolment
Before starting the intervention, informed and obtained signed consent from the patient's next of kin. Later, patients were recruited into an experimental (n=20) and a control group (n=20).
Step-2
Sociodemographic and clinical variables
Step-2
Sociodemographic and clinical variables
The researcher collected data related to sociodemographic and clinical variables before starting the intervention.
Step-3
Assessment of vital signs and level of consciousness.
Step-3
Assessment of vital signs and level of consciousness.
Vital signs and GCS scores were measured five minutes prior to each session over a period of three consecutive days.
Step-4
Intervention (Tactile Stimulation)
Step-4
Conservative care
Tactile stimulation was provided to patients with mild to moderate TBI, three times a day at 8am, 12pm and 4pm, for three consecutive days, with each session lasting between 15–20 minutes. It was carried out in three steps, with a 1-minute gap between each. Firstly; the hand surfaces were touched from the wrist down. Next, the shoulders and hands of the patients were touched with a soft brush. Lastly, a cotton-wisp wool applicator was used to touch the hands and forearm of patients.
Step-5
Reassessment of vital signs and level of consciousness
Step-5
Reassessment of vital signs and level of consciousness
Vital signs and GCS scores were reassessed again five minutes after each session to examine the effects of tactile stimulation.
Table 1:

Socio-demographic variables of TBI patients (N=40)

VariableControl Group (N=20) Freq. (%)Experimental Group (N=20) Freq. (%)Total (N=40) Freq. (%)p value
Age (in yrs)
18–3410(50)10(50)20(50)0.189
35–508(40)4(20)12(30)
51–652(10)6(30)8(20)
Gender
Male18(90)17(85)35(87.5)0.633
Female2(10)3(15)5(12.5)
Marital status
Married11(55)17(85)28(70)0.084
Unmarried9(45)3(15)12(30)
Education
No education3(15)4(20)7(17.5)
Primary & Secondary15(75)15(75)30(75)0.894
Graduation2(10)1(5)3(7.5)
Occupation
Homemaker3(15)5(25)8(20)
Private job11(55)10(50)21(52.5)0.710
Govt. job1(5)2(10)3(7.5)
Unemployed5(25)3(15)8(20)
Religion
Hindu19(95)18(90)37(92.5)0.486
Muslim1(5)2(10)3(7.5)
Monthly income
>50,0005(25)9(45)14(35)0.185
<50,00015(75)11(55)26(65)
Family type
Nuclear4(20)5(25)9(22.5)0.705
Joint16(80)15(75)31(77.5)
Accompanying member
One member11(55)12(60)23(57.5)0.749
Two members9(45)8(40)17(42.5)
Time spent by family member with patient/day
0–12hrs4(20)5(25)9(22.5)0.705
12–24hrs16(80)15(75)31(77.5)

* Significance Level p<0.05 (Chi square test and Fisher's exact test)

Table 2:

Clinical variables of TBI patients (N=40)

VariableControl Group (N=20)
Freq. (%)
Experimental Group (n=20)
Freq. (%)
Total (n=40)
Freq. (%)
p value
GCS at admission
Moderate injury (9–12)11(55)9(45)20(50)0.595
Mild injury (13–15)9(45)11(55)20(50)
Cause of hospitalization
RTA16(80)17(85)33(82.5)0.677
Falls4(20)3(15)7(17.5)
Type of injury
SDH2(10)4(20)6(15)
EDH2(10)3(15)5(12.5)0.001*
Contusions1(5)10(50)11(27.5)
Mixed15(75)3(15)18(45)
Accompanying injuries
No injuries19(95)17(85)36(90)0.486
Limb fracture1(5)3 (15)4(10)
Co morbidities
No20(100)17(85)37(92.5)0.231
Hypertension-3(15)3(7.5)
Previous history of head injury
Yes1(5)2(10)3(7.5)0.548
No19(95)18(90)37(92.5)
History of hospitalization in ICU
Yes4(20)6(30)10(25)
No16(80)14(70)30(75)0.465
Medical Treatment
Antipyretics (PCM)14(70)17(85)31(77.5)
Diuretics (Mannitol)3(15)2(10)5(12.5)0.475
Antiseizures3(15)1(5)4(10)
Management
Conservative9(45)10(50)19(47.5)
Craniotomy4(20)1(5)5(12.5)
Craniectomy4(20)4(20)8(20)0.641
Cranioplasty2(10)4(20)6(15)
Hemicraniectomy1(5)1(5)2(5)

GCS- Glasgow Coma Scale; RTA- Road Traffic Accident; SDH- Subdural Haemorrhage; EDH- Extradural Haemorrhage

* Significance Level (p<0.05), Chi- square test and Fisher's exact test

Table 3:

Between group comparison of vital signs and GCS on Day1, Day2 and Day3 (N=40)

VariableBaselinep valueAfter Interventionp value
Control Group (n=20) Mean RankExp. Group (n=20) Mean RankControl Group (n=20) Mean RankExp. Group (n=20) Mean Rank
SBP
Day121.3319.680.65422.7318.280.228
Day219.5321.480.59717.7323.250.136
Day319.2521.450.60619.6821.330.655
DBP
Day122.0019.000.41720.6520.350.935
Day221.3319.680.65521.0519.950.777
Day319.5021.500.58720.1020.900.888
TEMP
Day120.2820.730.89020.6521.000.747
Day219.0022.000.31721.0522.150.370
Day319.0022.000.26220.1023.680.85
PULSE
Day122.2818.730.33622.1518.850.370
Day223.2817.730.13323.1317.730.133
Day323.3817.640.11923.6817.330.085
RESP
Day123.6817.340.07223.8017.200.61
Day222.1518.850.34023.1317.880.155
Day323.4017.600.9521.8019.200.455
SPO2
Day121.4319.580.59419.9821.030.762
Day222.0818.930.37017.7523.250.136
Day320.2020.200.86220.2021.330.133
GCS
Day121.2519.750.67621.6019.400.541
Day221.3519.650.63520.7820.230.879
Day 320.0320.980.79318.5822.430.290

[i] SBP- Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP- Diastolic Blood Pressure, GCS- Glasgow Coma Scale*Significance Level p<0.05 (Mann- Whitney U Test)**

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62838/jccm-2026-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 351 - 358
Submitted on: Jun 24, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 9, 2026
Published on: Jul 27, 2026
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Richa Bhogal, Nimarta Rana, Nipin Kalal, Khina Sharma, Suryanarayanan Bhaskar, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.