Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
High-fidelity simulation programs in ICU-related ethical non-technical skills training: A narrative review Cover

High-fidelity simulation programs in ICU-related ethical non-technical skills training: A narrative review

Open Access
|Apr 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Study flow chart

Study’s description, participants, and characteristics of the interventions

Author (Year)CountryDesignSample SizeInterventionDurationDescription
Tanoubi et al. (2020)Canadashort report10 cohorts of residents (24 residents in each cohort)High-fidelity simulation10 years3 simulation scenarios involving circumstances with different ethical issues (instruction in critical incident disclosure, communication regarding patient awareness under general anesthesia, and physicians’ perspectives on overriding do-not-resuscitate orders in the context of iatrogenic cardiac arrest)
Ghoneim et al (2018)USAinterventional study15 participants (NICU trainees)A simulation-based training intervention focusing on the SPIKES protocol for breaking bad news1 yearParticipant delivery of bad news to a standardized parent (actor in the role of a parent).
Colman et al (2019)USAmixed methodological observation cohort study165 participants (nurses, critical care fellow, respiratory therapist)Implementation of team training through simulation21-month periodThe simulation program comprised 30 mandatory workshops, each lasting 3 hours and featuring three scenarios based on real-life ICU cases, using mannequin settings, trained embedded participants, and facilitator prompts. After the simulations, there was an improvement in communication, teamwork, and role appointment.
Figueroa et al (2012)USAinterventional study37 participantsThe course included: didactics and high-fidelity simulation-based training3 monthsThe implementation of Team STEPPS protocol and its incorporation into both, the course content and simulation scenarios, resulted in improved communication within the multidisciplinary PICU team.
Downar et al (2012)Canadainterventional study51 traineesThis communication workshop incorporated a short didactic session and four simulated family meetings, using trained professionals as standardized family members.5 yearsFindings of the workshop included ethical and legal knowledge and communication comfort (before and after the workshop), as well as communication skills. Participation in the practical course significantly enhanced ethical and legal knowledge and improved communication comfort among the critical care trainees.
Arnold et al (2015)USAinterventional study38 Pulmonary and critical care fellowsThe intervention was a 3-day communication skills workshop incorporating short didactic sessions, faculty skill demonstrations, and practice with simulated families.2 yearsTraining focused on three core domains: delivering bad news, achieving consensus on therapeutic goals, and discussing limitations of life-sustaining treatments. Participant self-assessments of competence in 11 key communication points were collected before and after the workshop using a 5-point Likert scale.
Hope et al (2015)USAinterventional study31 critical care fellowsA didactic curriculum containing lectures and case discussions on end-of-life care, communication, palliative care, and bioethics was created, supplemented by two simulated family meetings3 yearsResidents participated in 101 family meeting simulation. After following a month-long curriculum, more than 90% of trainees declared increased comfort – either ‘slightly’ or ‘much’ more comfortable – with debates regarding the relinquishment of life-sustaining treatment.
Sung et al (2025)TaiwanProspective interventional study237 participants, including medical trainees, nurses, respiratory therapists, and administrative staff.The intervention incorporated two high-fidelity scenarios simulating real emergencies.5 yearsThe group performing was evaluated using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Methodical questionnaires granted qualitative feedback that was analysed thematically. Involvement in the program allowed an improved communication, teamwork and collaborative skills between healthcare professionals working in vulnerable environments.

j_jccm-2026-0002_tab_002

DatabaseSearch equationsFilters
PubMed (Medline)“non-technical skills “OR” ethics education “AND” simulation training”-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62838/jccm-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 150 - 157
Submitted on: Oct 4, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2026
Published on: Apr 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Alexandra-Maria Boldis, Cristina Petrisor, Darius Turcas, George-Calin Dindelegan, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.