Metaliteracy as Pedagogical Framework for Learner-Centered Design in Three MOOC Platforms: Connectivist, Coursera and Canvas
References
- Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. The International Review of Research In Open & Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2185
- Conache, M., Dima, R., & Mutu, A. (2016). A comparative analysis of MOOC (massive open online course) platforms. Informatica Economica, 20(2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/20.2.2016.01
- Downes, S. (2007, February 3). What connectivism is[Web log post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
- Downes, S. (2011, January5). “Connectivism” and connective knowledge. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-downes/connectivism-and-connecti_b_804653.html
- Downes, S. (2013, April 9). What the ‘x’ in ‘xMOOC’ stands for [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://plus.google.com/+StephenDownes/posts/LEwaKxL2MaM
- Dubosson, M., & Emad, S. (2015). The forum community, the connectivist element of an xMOOC. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(10), 680–690.
- Dunaway, M. K. (2011). Connectivism: learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111186686
- Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0024-z
- Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc. (Original work published in 1970).
- Funieru, L. M., & Lăzăroiu, F. (2016). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): A comparative analysis of the main platforms. Informatica Economica, 20(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/20.2.2016.04
- Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
- Li, S. L., Tang, Q. T., & Zhang, Y. Z. (2016). A case study on learning difficulties and corresponding supports for learning in cMOOCs. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 42(2), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.21432/T2GS4S
- Mackey, T. P., Forte, M., Allain, N., Jacobson, T. E., & Pitera, J. (2015). MOOC talk: A connectivist dialogue about our metaliteracy MOOC experience. All About Mentoring, 46, 34–40. Retrieved from https://www.esc.edu/news/magazines-journal/all-about-mentoring
- Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
- Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing information literacy to empower learners. Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman.
- Metaliteracy Learning Collaborative. (2014, September11). Goals and learning objectives: Developing metaliterate learners [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://metaliteracy.org/learning-objectives
- Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
- Pilli, O., & Admiraal, W. (2016). A taxonomy of massive open online courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 223–240. Retrieved from http://www.cedtech.net/articles/73/733.pdf
- Prinsloo, P. (2016). Metaliteracy, networks, agency, and praxis. In T. E. Jacobson & T. P. Mackey (Eds.), Metaliteracy in practice (pp. 183–201). Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman.
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
- Siemens, G. (2012, June 3). What is the theory that underpins our moocs? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/
- Skrypnyk, O., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Gaševic, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 188–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2170
- Terras, M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12274
- Thomas, S. (2013). Technobiophilia: Nature and cyberspace. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.553 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 267 - 286
Submitted on: Jan 9, 2017
Accepted on: Jun 7, 2017
Published on: Jul 1, 2017
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2017 Kelsey L. O’Brien, Michele Forte, Thomas P. Mackey, Trudi E. Jacobson, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.