Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implementing the First Cross-border Professional Development Online Course through International E-mentoring: Reflections and Perspectives Cover

Implementing the First Cross-border Professional Development Online Course through International E-mentoring: Reflections and Perspectives

Open Access
|Jan 2017

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

WisCom model with “Cycle of Inquiry” module design (Adapted with permission from Gunawardena et al., 2006)

Figure 2

IScreen capture of a sample module

Table 1

Overview of the modules of the online course

Module No.Titlee-activitiesAssignment
Pre-course activitiesForum
Pre course self-reflection instrument
Reflective Journal
Individual
1Paradigm shift to online tutoring/facilitating/moderatingForum
Reflective Journal
-
2The role of an online tutor mentor and necessary skills and qualificationsChat
Forum
Quiz
Reflective Journal
-
3Building an online learning community and creating the social environmentReflective JournalIndividual
4Facilitating InteractionReflective JournalIndividual – 3
5Collaborative learning and team building onlineReflective JournalIndividual
6Facilitating knowledge constructionForum
Reflective Journal
7e-MentoringForum
WIKI
Pre and Post questionnaire on cross cultural e-mentoring
Reflective Journal
Mid course self-reflection instrument
Group
8Providing Learner SupportReflective JournalIndividual
9Orienting students to online learningQuiz
Reflective Journal
10Assessing Learning & Providing FeedbackForum
Reflective Journal
individual
11Conducting Practical Course
Components at a Distance and Virtual Labs
Online simulation
Forum
Reflective Journal
-
12Cultural Issues Related to Learning and CommunicationForum
Quiz
Reflective Journal
Individual and Group
13Ethics of Online LearningForum
Reflective Journal
14Monitoring and Evaluating Tutors/MentorsForum
Reflective Journal
Final course self-reflection instrument
Table 2

Course Achievements and Pedagogical Aspects

ThemeSupportive quotations
Overall satisfaction (100%)I would say all. The content helped me to expand my knowledge of what online learning entails, the role of mentors and what we need to support learners in an online environment. The challenges and obstacles faced, helped me to understand things from the student’s perspective, as well as gain insight and understanding on how to handle issues andproblems as a tutor in the online environment (Mid course self-reflection, Sri Lankan Female 1).
This is probably the last week of the course and time to say goodbye to each other. I am not writing “ Goodbye” in its true sense, this is just coming out of scheduled online activities, otherwise it is actually start of friendship of a new inter country Community. We will cherish the memories of this period for long time and will remain in touch with each other...In other words it is beginning of the new “Online” Culture (Last week entries of the Reflective Journal – Pakistani Female 1).
Instructional design of the course (100%)I like the use of three orientation modes of each module i.e. Purpose of the course, tutor’s message and the learning challenge. Instead of mixing up all three in one document it is a nice way of explaining expected outcomes and experiences designed in each module (Mid course self-reflection – Pakistani Female 2).
Table 3

Issues Faced by Participants and OUSL Academics

ThemeSupportive quotations
Lack of Peer support for group tasksIt is not easy to produce a group work in online as some students pay less attention to the target and do what they want even under good online background. Some are not collaborative and aim mostly their individual targets. Some are difficult to negotiate (Final course self-reflection – Sri Lankan Female 2).
A bit frustrated again since the only group member who is at least a little responsive, just directly wrote to the moderator and then only just responded to what was said by the moderator, ignoring that this is a group activity and we all need to be involved (Journal Reflections week 3 – Sri Lankan female 1)
Our e-mentoring sessions were not very useful in getting a true sense of online collaboration – (Final course self-reflection – Sri Lankan Male 1).
WorkloadI think the workload is high. It was difficult to manage 3 modules in one week with other commitments in work place and home (Final course self-reflection – Sri Lankan Female 2).
Online learning means a lot of commitment and planning. I didn’t realize how time consuming it can be (Mid course self-reflection – Mauritius Female 1).
Difficulty in navigating multi structuresMany activities going simultaneously made me feel uneasy (Mid course self-reflection, Pakistani Female 2)
Social PresenceI would like to see photographs of OUSLEL team especially X … who was constantly with us throughout the course. Seeing and believing is different than just believing without seeing… (Final course self-reflection – Pakistani Female 1).
Less sensitive to Plagiarism and copyright lawsOnly a handful of group members brought original thinking to the activities. Most were content with copying something directly from the web. Rather than collaborating, it was a task of gluing together individual write-ups (or content pilfered from the web) – (Final course self-reflection – Sri Lankan Male 1).
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 44
Submitted on: Oct 30, 2016
Accepted on: Mar 9, 2017
Published on: Jan 1, 2017
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Buddhini Gayathri Jayatilleke, Geetha Udayanganie Kulasekara, Malinda Bandara Kumarasinha, Charlotte Nirmalani Gunawardena, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.