Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of an Online Teaching Competency Scale for University Instructors Cover

Development of an Online Teaching Competency Scale for University Instructors

Open Access
|Oct 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic Characteristics of Online Instructors.

n%
Gender
    Male18346.7
    Female20953.3
Age
    25–354712
    36–5020452
    51 and above14136
Teaching Level
    Bachelor’s degree6717.1
    Undergraduate32181.9
    Graduate41.0
Discipline of Instructors
    Engineering19048.5
    Health13634.7
    Social Science6616.8
Used Online Teaching Platforms
    Zoom30076.5
    Google Meet14436.7
    BigBlueButton205.1
    Microsoft Teams184.6
    Canvas17945.7
    Google Classroom5213.3
Figure 1

The development and validation process of the scale.

Figure 2

Scree Plot Graph.

Table 2

Standardized Factor Loads, Explained Variance, and Reliabilities of the Scale.

ITEMSCOMMUNALITIESf1f2f3f4
Pedagogy
27I clearly state the learning objectives of the course..779.942
26I clearly state the topics of the course..750.931
28I make the preparations for the course before the live sessions..677.787
24I attend live sessions enthusiastically..564.731
29I use teaching methods and techniques that will enable students to participate in live sessions..530.449
Facilitation
32I support students to build and maintain a learning community..758.963
33I help students develop a positive attitude towards online learning..664.803
31I enable students to establish online learning community relationships with me and each other..661.727
Technology
11I effectively use the hardware tools (computer, tablet, camera, etc.) required by online education..774.882
12I effectively use software tools required by online education..756.831
20I solve the problems that I encounter while using online education tools myself.460.750
Course Administration
16I organize my courses in a modular (weekly, topic, etc.) structure in LMS..631.840
14I effectively use discussion forums in LMS..661.819
13I effectively use the existing components (homework, calendar, etc.) of the LMS..517.530
10I organize activities that will increase communication and interaction in LMS..454.456
Eiegen Values5.331.941.201.18
Explained total variance (Total = %64.244)%35.50%12.92%7.96%7.86
Cronbach’s alpha α = .834α = .832α = .772α = .702α = .680
Table 3

Means, standard deviations, and inter-correlations between the factors.

MeanSDPEFATECA
Pedagogy (PE)4.68.401
Facilitation (FA)4.17.81.46**1
Technology (TE)4.19.71.47**.42**1
Course Administration (CA)3.36.89.30**.40**.36**1

[i] ** p < .01.

Table 4

Convergent Validity Values.

CRAVE
Pedagogy0.890.62
Facilitation0.870.70
Technology0.860.68
Interaction0.830.57
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 212
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2021
Accepted on: May 29, 2021
Published on: Oct 20, 2021
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Irfan Simsek, Sevda Kucuk, Sezer Kose Biber, Tuncer Can, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.