Figure 1
Proposed research model.
Table 2
Part of the questionnaire used to collect data
| Factor | Code | Item |
|---|---|---|
| Performance accomplishments | PA1 | My interaction with the system is clear and understandable. |
| PA2 | Learning how to use the system is easy for me. | |
| PA3 | I find the system easy to use | |
| PA4 | It is easy for me to become skillful at using the system. | |
| Vicarious experience | VE1 | People who influence my behavior will think that I should use the system |
| VE2 | People who are important to me will think that I should use the system. | |
| VE3 | People whose opinions that I value prefer that I use the system. | |
| Organizational support | OS1 | I am supported and encouraged by my organization to use the system in my job |
| OS2 | The training provided by my university helped me get familiar with the system | |
| OS3 | When I have difficulty using the Moodle system, I can exchange information with others who know how to use the system functions better | |
| OS4 | When I have difficulty using the system, I can discuss with others who know how to make better use the system features | |
| System self-efficacy | SE1 | I am confident about my ability to use the system to complete my work |
| SE2 | I believe in my capability of using the system to complete my work | |
| SE3 | I have mastered the skills necessary for using this system in my job |
[i] Note. Scale labels: 1 – Strongly Agree, 2 – Agree, 3 – Neutral, 4 –Disagree, 5 – Strongly Disagree
Figure 2
Distribution of instructors per eLearning system access.
Table 3
Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for reliability measurement
| Factor | Cronbach’s alpha | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Performance accomplishments | .835 |
| 2. | Vicarious experience | .795 |
| 3. | Organizational support | .804 |
| 4. | System self-efficacy | .841 |
Table 4
Factor loadings on each factor
| Factor | Items in Direct Oblimin Rotation | Loadings |
|---|---|---|
| Performance accomplishments | PA1 | .836 |
| PA2 | .822 | |
| PA3 | .872 | |
| PA4 | .722 | |
| Vicarious experience | VE1 | .879 |
| VE2 | .899 | |
| VE3 | .375 | |
| VE4 | .79 | |
| Organizational support | OS1 | .815 |
| OS2 | .827 | |
| OS3 | .842 | |
| OS4 | .658 | |
| System self-efficacy | SS1 | .824 |
| SS2 | .855 | |
| SS3 | .787 | |
| SS4 | .825 |
Table 5
Unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients for the constructs
| Construct | B | SE | Beta | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organizational support | .252 | .056 | .252 | .000 |
| Performance accomplishments | .045 | .053 | .045 | .398 |
| Vicarious experience | .203 | .055 | .203 | .000 |
Table 6
Summary of results hypothesis testing
| Results | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis 1 | Organizational support has an effect on system self-efficacy amongst instructors | Beta = .252, p < .000 | Supported |
| Hypothesis 2 | Performance accomplishments has an effect on system self-efficacy amongst instructors. | Beta=.045, p < .000 | Not Supported |
| Hypothesis 3 | Vicarious experience has an effect on system self-efficacy amongst instructors. | Beta = .203, p< .000 | Supported |
[i] Note. Statistically significant values at p< .05 or p< .001