Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality and Cost Matter: Students’ Perceptions of Open versus Non-Open Texts through a Single-Blind Review Cover

Quality and Cost Matter: Students’ Perceptions of Open versus Non-Open Texts through a Single-Blind Review

By:  and    
Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. Anonymous. (2015). Introduction to Psychology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Library Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/8668.1201
  2. Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18, 1. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972
  3. Bliss, T.J., Robinson, T.J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. http://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04
  4. Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 516. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
  5. Clinton, V., Legerski, E., & Rhodes, B. (2019). Comparing student learning from and perceptions of open and commercial textbooks excerpts: A randomized experiment, Frontiers in Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00110
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London, England: Routledge.
  7. Dimitrov, D.M. (2008). Quantitative research in education: Intermediate and advanced methods. Oceanside, NY: Whittier Publications.
  8. Feldman, R.S. (2010). Understanding Psychology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  9. Feldstein, A., Martin, M., Hudson, A., Warren, K., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2012). Open textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from https://www.eurodl.org/index.php?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=2&article=533
  10. Gil, P., Candelas, F., Jara, C., Garcia, G., & Torres, F. (2013). Web-based OERs in computer networks. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 15371550.
  11. Grissett, J. & Huffman, C. (2019). An open versus traditional psychology textbook: Student performance, perceptions, and use. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 2135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718810181
  12. Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
  13. Illowsky, B.S., Hilton III, J., Whiting, J., & Ackerman, J.D. (2016). Examining student perception of an open statistics book. Open Praxis, 8(3), 265276. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.304
  14. Jhangiani, R.S., & Jhangiani, S. (2017). Investigating the perceptions, use, and impact of open textbooks: A survey of post-secondary students in British Columbia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3012
  15. Lindshield, B., & Adhikari, K. (2013). Online and campus college students like using an open educational resource instead of a traditional textbook. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(1), 2638. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no1/lindshield_0313.htm
  16. Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton-Detzner, C., Walling, J., & Weiss, S. (2011). Open textbook adoption and use: Implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(1), 3949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.538563
  17. Pitt, R., Ebrahimi, N., McAndrew, P., & Coughlan, T. (2013). Assessing OER impact across organizations and learners: Experiences from the bridge to success project. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(3), 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2013-17
  18. Rosengren, K.E. (1981). Advances in Scandinavia content analysis: An introduction. In K.E. Rosengren (Ed.), Advances in content analysis (pp. 919). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  19. Spielman, R., Dumper, K., Jenkins, W., Lovett, M., Perlmutter, M. (2014). Psychology. Open Access Textbooks. 1. Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/oer-textbook/1
  20. Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The Access Compromise and the 5th R. Iterating toward openness (web blog). Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
  21. Wood, S.E., Wood, E.G. & Boyd, D. (2014). Mastering the World of Psychology (5th ed.). Pearson.
  22. Woodward, S., Lloyd, A., & Kimmons, R. (2017). Student voice in textbook evaluation: Comparing open and restricted textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3170
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 114
Submitted on: Sep 10, 2019
Accepted on: Jan 28, 2020
Published on: Mar 31, 2019
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Feng-Ru Sheu, Judy Grissett, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.