Table 1a
Descriptive Analysis of NOUN Graduates Level of Competency in Clinical Performance (N=222)
| S/N | Domain competency | Response categories | Total | Mean score | Cut-off point | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||||
| 1 | Comportment and appearance | 324 | 300 | 80 | 1 | 705 | 3.17 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Approach to patients | 380 | 252 | 86 | 0 | 718 | 3.23 | 2.50 |
| 3 | Preparation | 316 | 309 | 74 | 3 | 702 | 3.16 | 2.50 |
| 4 | Procedure | 396 | 348 | 14 | 1 | 758 | 3.41 | 2.50 |
| 5 | Speed and accuracy | 264 | 243 | 138 | 6 | 651 | 2.93 | 2.50 |
| 6 | Finishing | 328 | 297 | 80 | 1 | 706 | 3.18 | 2.50 |
| 7 | Understanding of purpose | 332 | 333 | 60 | 2 | 727 | 3.27 | 2.50 |
| 8 | Awareness of total situation | 384 | 273 | 70 | 0 | 727 | 3.27 | 2.50 |
| 9 | Approach to people | 356 | 270 | 81 | 3 | 709 | 3.19 | 2.50 |
| 10 | Teaching ability | 376 | 261 | 74 | 4 | 715 | 3.22 | 2.50 |
| Average | 345.6 | 288.6 | 68.6 | 2.2 | 641.8 | 3.20* | 2.50 | |
[i] Overall clinical performance mean score = 3.20* (significant)
Table 1b
Descriptive Analysis of NOUN Graduates Level of Competency in Nursing Documentation (N=222)
| S/N | Phases of nursing process | Response categories | Total | Mean score | Cut-off point | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||||
| 1 | Assessment | 348 | 354 | 34 | 0 | 736 | 3.32 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Nursing diagnosis | 376 | 303 | 46 | 4 | 729 | 3.28 | 2.50 |
| 3 | Planning | 292 | 264 | 118 | 2 | 676 | 3.04 | 2.50 |
| 4 | Implementation | 300 | 282 | 106 | 0 | 688 | 3.10 | 2.50 |
| 5 | Evaluation | 325 | 270 | 98 | 2 | 694 | 3.13 | 2.50 |
| Average | 328.2 | 294.6 | 80.4 | 1.6 | 704.6 | 3.17* | 2.50 | |
[i] Overall documentation mean score = 3.17* (significant)
Table 1c
Analysis and Rank Order of Means of NOUN Graduates Level of Competency in Knowledge and Understanding of Nursing Practice
| S/N | Variables | Mean | SD | Standard Error | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clinical reasoning | 3.36 | .583 | .039 | 1st |
| 2 | Critical thinking | 3.16 | .653 | .044 | 4th |
| 3 | Oral communication | 3.23 | .621 | .042 | 3rd |
| 4 | Content knowledge | 3.25 | .679 | .046 | 2nd |
[i] Overall knowledge and understanding mean score = 3.25* (significant)
Table 2
Descriptive Analysis of NOUN Graduates Attitude to Work Before and After Graduation as Assessed by Employers
| Indicators | N | Before Graduation | After Graduation | MD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Std Error | Mean | SD | Std Error | |||
| 1. Absenteeism | 222 | .49 | .906 | .061 | .17 | .440 | .030 | .32 |
| 2. Lateness | 222 | .81 | .956 | .064 | .30 | .564 | .038 | .51 |
| 3. Number of complaints against the employee | 222 | .56 | .775 | .052 | .20 | .465 | .031 | .36 |
| 4. Number of queries and warnings | 222 | .37 | .673 | .045 | .17 | .408 | .027 | .20 |
| 5. Number of work related accidents | 222 | .36 | .691 | .046 | .17 | .408 | .027 | .19 |
| 6. Use of mobile phone while at work | 222 | .36 | .649 | .044 | .18 | .476 | .032 | .18 |
[i] Key: SD = Standard deviation, MD = Mean difference
Table 3
Descriptive Analysis of NOUN Graduates Attitude to Work Before and After Graduation as Assessed by Own Self
| S/N | Attitude items | N | Before Graduation | After Graduation | MD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Std Error | Mean | SD | Std Error | ||||
| 1 | I am very interested in this work, it is very important for me | 222 | 3.60 | .490 | .033 | 3.60 | .490 | .033 | 00 |
| 2 | Sometimes I absent myself from duty | 222 | 2.96 | .815 | .055 | 2.96 | .805 | .055 | 00 |
| 3 | I don’t like the kind of job I do | 222 | 3.62 | .565 | .038 | 3.62 | .565 | .038 | 00 |
| 4 | I accept assignments without complaints | 222 | 3.32 | .494 | .033 | 3.18 | .665 | .033 | .14 |
| 5 | I arrive on time prepared to work | 222 | 3.52 | .527 | .035 | 3.52 | .527 | .035 | 00 |
| 6 | I feel very dissatisfied about my job | 222 | 3.55 | .620 | .042 | 3.55 | .620 | .042 | 00 |
| 7 | I would be better off working under different environment | 222 | 3.28 | .885 | .059 | 3.28 | .885 | .059 | 00 |
| 8 | I take much pride in my job | 222 | 3.59 | .546 | .037 | 3.59 | .546 | .037 | 00 |
| 9 | Sometimes I feel bored about my job | 222 | 3.20 | .716 | .048 | 3.20 | .716 | .048 | 00 |
| 10 | I participate in all clinical activities when on duty | 222 | 3.20 | .543 | .036 | 3.20 | .543 | .036 | 00 |
| 11 | Taking care of patients makes me fulfilled | 222 | 3.57 | .496 | .033 | 3.57 | .496 | .033 | 00 |
[i] Key: SD = Standard deviation, MD = Mean difference
Table 4
Descriptive Analysis of Proportion of Graduate Competency Attributed to Workplace Experience and Education in NOUN
| Competency category | Frequency | % | Mean | SD | Standard Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workplace experience | 108 | 62.4 | 4.54 | 3.66 | .086 |
| Education | 65 | 37.6 | 3.62 | 3.01 | .032 |

Figure 1
Quadrant analysis by competency and perception dimension
Table 5
Analysis of Means and Rank Order of NOUN Graduates Nurses’ Responses on the Quality of Education Provision in NOUN (N=222)
| S/N | Variables/Items | Mean | Rank order | Cut-off point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Availability of course materials | 2.99 | 5th | 2.50 |
| 2 | Quality of course content /modules | 3.16 | 1st | 2.50 |
| 3 | Level of practical learning activities in course modules | 3.05 | 4th | 2.50 |
| 4 | Conduciveness of learning environment | 2.80 | 8th | 2.50 |
| 5 | Provision of clinical practicum exercise | 2.79 | 9th | 2.50 |
| 6 | Quality of clinical practicum experience | 2.91 | 7th | 2.50 |
| 7 | Quality of Infrastructural facilities | 2.79 | 9th | 2.50 |
| 8 | Quality of nursing degree programme | 3.07 | 3rd | 2.50 |
| 9 | Level of interaction /contact with fellow students | 3.14 | 2nd | 2.50 |
| 10 | Provision of facilitation | 2.95 | 6th | 2.50 |
