How Laypeople Frame Inequality to Signal (Il)legitimacy: Strategic, Yet Potentially Counterproductive
References
- Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
- Agostini, M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256
- Bellani, L., Bledow, N., Busemeyer, M. R., & Schwerdt, G. (2021). When everyone thinks they’re middle-class: (Mis-)Perceptions of inequality and why they matter for social policy (Policy Paper 06: Inequality Barometer – Inequality and Social Mobility). University of Konstanz. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-19g74ruixis9k4
- Birch, S., & Allen, N. (2010). How honest do politicians need to be? The Political Quarterly, 81(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02066.x
- Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
- Braun, M., Martiny, S., & Bruckmüller, S. (2023). From serial reproduction to serial communication: Transmission of the focus of comparison in lay communication about gender inequality. Human Communication Research, 49(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac024
- Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Singled out as the effect to be explained: Implications for collective self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212471686
- Bruckmüller, S., & Braun, M. (2020). One group’s advantage or another group’s disadvantage? How comparative framing shapes explanations of, and reactions to, workplace gender inequality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20932631
- Bruckmüller, S., Reese, G., & Martiny, S. E. (2017). Is higher inequality less legitimate? Depends on how you frame it! British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12202
- Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 813–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813
- Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00209
- Dietze, P., & Craig, M. A. (2021). Framing economic inequality and policy as group disadvantages (versus group advantages) spurs support for action. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00988-4
- Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.682
- Dover, T. L. (2022). Not all inequalities are created equal: Inequality framing and privilege threat for advantaged groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(3), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211018741
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2005). Instrumental relations among groups: Group competition, conflict, and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 227–243). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963.ch14
- Flusberg, S. J., Holmes, K. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Nabi, R. L., & Matlock, T. (2024). The psychology of framing: How everyday language shapes the way we think, feel, and act. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 25(3), 105–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006241246966
- German Federal Government (2021). Life situations in Germany: The German federal government’s sixth report on poverty and wealth. https://www.armuts-und-reichtumsbericht.de/DE/Bericht/Bisherige-Berichte/Der-sechste-Bericht/Der-Bericht/der-bericht.html
- Giles, H., Hansen, K., & Gardikiotis, A. (2025). Prologuing and communicating intergroup matters. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 33(5), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2025.2525798
- Giles, H., & Maass, A. (2016). Advances in and prospects for intergroup communication: Prologue. In H. Giles & A. Maass (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 1–15). Peter Lang.
- Greenaway, K. H., Fisk, K., & Branscombe, N. R. (2017). Context matters: Explicit and implicit reminders of ingroup privilege increase collective guilt among foreigners in a developing country. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(12), 677–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12482
- Hegarty, P., & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Asymmetric explanations of group differences: Experimental evidence of Foucault’s disciplinary power. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12017
- Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992330
- Jun, S., Chow, R. M., van der Veen, A. M., & Bleich, E. (2022). Chronic frames of social inequality: How mainstream media frame race, gender, and wealth inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(21), Article e2110712119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110712119
- Kramer, H. J., Goldfarb, D., Tashjian, S. M., & Hansen Lagattuta, K. (2021). Dichotomous thinking about social groups: Learning about one group can activate opposite beliefs about another group. Cognitive Psychology, 129, Article e101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101408
- Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616673192
- Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), Article e251524592095150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951503
- Liberman, N., Trope, Y., Macrae, S., & Sherman, S. (2007). The effect of level of construal on temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.009
- Lux, A., Bruckmüller, S., & Hoorens, V. (2025). Interpretations of generic versus comparative statements about groups: Similarities and differences. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 44(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X241292562
- Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 79–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60272-5
- Malapally, A. (2026). When is inequality framed as disadvantage, when as advantage, and why does that matter? Evidence from a mixed-methods approach [Doctoral dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg]. Open FAU. https://doi.org/10.25593/open-fau-2732
- Malapally, A., Blombach, A., Heinrich, P., Schnepf, J., & Bruckmüller, S. (2024). Unequal tweets: Black disadvantage is (re)tweeted more but discussed less than white privilege. Political Communication, 41(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2257624
- Malapally, A., Methner, N., Braun, M., Wittenborn, S., & Bruckmüller, S. (2026). Framing inequality as advantage versus disadvantage: A systematic review of effects and a two-step model to explain them. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 30(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683251333458
- Oschatz, C., & Marker, C. (2020). Long-term persuasive effects in narrative communication research: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa017
- Phillips, L. T., Jun, S., & Shakeri, A. (2022). Barriers and boosts: Using Inequity Frames Theory to expand understanding of mechanisms of racial and gender inequity. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 547–587. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0314
- Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton Mifflin.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
- Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213510525
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
- United Nations (n.d.). Inequality – A defining challenge of our time. Retrieved July 1, 2025, from https://www.un.org/en/desa/inequality-–-defining-challenge-our-time
- van der Pas, D., Aaldering, L., & Bos, A. L. (2024). Looks like a leader: Measuring evolution in gendered politician stereotypes. Political Behavior, 46(3), 1653–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09888-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2026-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 333 - 362
Published online: Nov 8, 2026
Published in print: Jan 1, 2026
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Susanne Bruckmüller, Annette Malapally, Nicole Methner, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.