Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Persistence of Gender Stereotypes: Evidence from the Found-in-Translation Task Cover

The Persistence of Gender Stereotypes: Evidence from the Found-in-Translation Task

Open Access
|Oct 2026
Read online

References

  1. Bailey, A. H., & LaFrance, M. (2017). Who counts as human? Antecedents to androcentric behavior. Sex Roles, 76, 682–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0648-4
  2. Basfirinci, C., Cilingir Uk, Z., Karaoglu, S., & Onbas, K. (2019). Implicit occupational gender stereotypes: a research among Turkish university students. Gender in Management, 34(2), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2018-0084
  3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
  4. Birney, M. E., Roessel, J., Hansen, K., & Rakić, T. (2020). Prologue: Language challenges in the 21st century. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20933315
  5. Bojarska, K. (2011). Influence of androcentric and gender-inclusive lexical constructions on gender-associational responses. Studia Psychologiczne, 49(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10167-011-0010-y
  6. Bojarska, K. (2013). Responding to lexical stimuli with gender associations: a cognitive-cultural model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12463008
  7. Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Baumgärtner, M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(5), 1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00556.x
  8. Braun, F., Sczesny, S. & Stahlberg, D. (2005). Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings. Communications, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.1
  9. Buckles, K. (2019). Fixing the leaky pipeline: Strategies for making economics work for women at every stage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.1.43
  10. Burgers C., & Beukeboom C. J. (2020). How language contributes to stereotype formation: Combined effects of label types and negation use in behavior descriptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(4), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20933320
  11. Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49(3), 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755647
  12. Costa-Jussà, M. R. (2019). An analysis of gender bias studies in natural language processing. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 495–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0105-5
  13. Dudak, A. (2019). Mężczyźni w zawodach sfeminizowanych – funkcjonujące stereotypy i ich konsekwencje w percepcji studentów [Men in female-dominated occupations: Functioning stereotypes and their consequences in students’ perceptions]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia, 32(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.17951/j.2019.32.4.217-230
  14. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
  15. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men in social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
  16. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). Mc-Graw-Hill.
  17. Formanowicz, M., & Hansen, K. (2022). Subtle linguistic cues affecting gender in(equality). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211035170
  18. Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., & Kuhn, E. A. (2018). Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 844–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218771742
  19. Grund, C. (2015). Gender pay gaps among highly educated professionals— Compensation components do matter. Labour Economics, 34, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.03.010
  20. Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Lévy, A., Pool, E., Grivel, M., & Pedrazzini, E. (2012). The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.642858
  21. Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2008). Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 464–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701702035
  22. Gygax, P., Sato, S., Öttl, A., & Gabriel, U. (2021). The masculine form in grammatically gendered languages and its multiple interpretations: A challenge for our cognitive system. Language Sciences, 83, 101328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101328
  23. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Research report ED544470). American Association of University Women. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509653.pdf
  24. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  25. Klasen, S., & Lamanna, F. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: New evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics, 15(3), 91–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700902893106
  26. Klasen, S., & Minasyan, A. (2017). Gender inequality and growth in Europe. Intereconomics, 52(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0637-z
  27. Krawczyk, M. (2017). Are all researchers male? Gender misattributions in citations. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2192-y
  28. Lampropoulou, S., & Georgalidou, M. (2017). Sexist language in Greek public discourse: When gender exclusive forms become a matter of grammatical correctness. Women’s Studies International Forum, 60, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.12.002
  29. Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: The need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering, 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3195570.3195580
  30. Legault, L., Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: how motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1472–1477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427918
  31. Lévy, A., Gygax, P., & Gabriel, U. (2014). Fostering the generic interpretation of grammatically masculine forms: When my aunt could be one of the mechanics. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.861467
  32. López Medel, M. (2021). Los efectos de la redacción no sexista del original en la traducción, en un corpus paralelo de las Naciones Unidas [The effects of the non-sexist writing of the original in the translation, in a parallel corpus of the United Nations]. Tonos Digital: Revista de Estudios Filológicos, (41). http://www.tonosdigital.es/ojs/index.php/tonos/article/view/2832
  33. Lunnemann, P., Jensen, M. H., & Jauffred, L. (2019). Gender bias in Nobel prizes. Palgrave Communications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0256-3
  34. MacArthur, H. J., Cundiff, J. L., & Mehl, M. R. (2020). Estimating the prevalence of gender-biased language in undergraduates’ everyday speech. Sex Roles, 82, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01033-z
  35. Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use:” Neutral” pronouns that aren’t. American Psychologist, 33(11), 1032–1036. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1032
  36. Parikh, R. B., Teeple, S., & Navathe, A. S. (2019). Addressing bias in artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA, 322(24), 2377–2378. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.18058
  37. Petrongolo, B., & Ronchi, M. (2020). Gender gaps and the structure of local labor markets. Labour Economics, 64, 101819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101819
  38. Prates, M. O., Avelar, P. H., & Lamb, L. C. (2020). Assessing gender bias in machine translation: a case study with Google Translate. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(10), 6363–6381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04144-6
  39. Pułaczewska, H. (2024). Cross-gender hijacking of high achievers by translation students: English to Polish. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18(4), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2024.2381933
  40. Ross, C. E., Masters, R. K., & Hummer, R. A. (2012). Education and the gender gaps in health and mortality. Demography, 49(4), 1157–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0130-z
  41. Ruppanner, L., & Treas, J. (2015). Working weekends: Changing European time regimes and gender inequality in household labor. Journal of Family Issues, 36(13), 1782–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13520155
  42. Santaemilia, J. (2015). Gender, sex and translation: The manipulation of identities. Routledge.
  43. Sporer, S. L., & Sharman, S. J. (2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self‐experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 20(6), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1234
  44. Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163-187). Psychology Press.
  45. Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S., & Braun, F. (2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(4), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X01020004004
  46. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Gentile, B. (2012). Male and female pronoun use in US books reflects women’s status, 1900–2008. Sex Roles, 67, 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0194-7
  47. Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293
  48. Vanhove, M., Stolz, T., Urdze, A., & Otsuka, H. (2012). Morphologies in contact. Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050057699.bm
  49. Weatherall, A. (2002). Gender, language and discourse. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203988817
  50. Wieremiejewicz, M. (2011). Językowy aspekt feminizacji niektórych zawodów [The Linguistic Aspect of the Feminization of Certain Professions]. In U. Sokólska (Ed.) Odmiany stylowe polszczyzny dawniej i dziś. (pp. 387–398). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku. http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9769
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 226 - 269
Published online: Oct 28, 2026
Published in print: Jan 1, 2026
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Patrycja Janowska-Widomska, Karolina Hansen, Michał Krawczyk, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.