Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Contexts and conditions of outgroup influence Cover

References

  1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorisation. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193). Sage.
  2. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Randsley de Moura, G., Hutchison, P., & Bown, N. J. (2004). The maintenance of entitativity: A subjective group dynamics approach. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 361–381). Psychology Press.
  3. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x
  4. Aberson, C. (2019). pwr2ppl: Power analyses for common designs (power to the people). R package version 0.1.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr2ppl
  5. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.949
  6. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
  7. Barbaro, M. (Host). (2022, April 22). The New York Times Daily [Audio Podcast]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/22/podcasts/the-daily/macron-le-pen-french-election.html
  8. Castro-Schilo, L., & Grimm, K. J. (2018). Using residualized change versus difference scores for longitudinal research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517718387
  9. Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). Indirect minority influence: The leniency contract revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298012001
  10. Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1437–1450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1437
  11. Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65(2), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01603.x
  12. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The in-group minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164086
  13. Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Gabarrot, F., & Mugny, G. (2009). Conformity and identity threat: The role of ingroup identification. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.68.2.79
  14. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J., Anastasio, P., Bachman, B., & Rust, M. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
  15. Gaffney, A. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2022). A social identity analysis of sociability: Making, breaking, and shaping groups and societies. In A. Gaffney & M. Hogg (Eds.), The psychology of sociability (pp. 140–161). Routledge.
  16. Gaffney, A. M., Rast, D. E., III, Hackett, J. D., & Hogg, M. A. (2014). Further to the right: Uncertainty, political polarization and the American “Tea Party” movement. Social Influence, 9(4), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.842495
  17. Gasiorek, J. (2016). The “dark side” side of CAT: Nonaccommodation. In H. Giles (Ed.) Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp 85–104). Cambridge University Press.
  18. Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press.
  20. Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  21. Goldman, L., & Hogg, M. A. (2016). Going to extremes for one’s group: The role of prototypicality and group acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(9), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12382
  22. Gross, T. (Host). (2020, April 12). Fresh Air [Audio Podcast]. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2020/08/12/901632573/black-power-scholar-illustrates-how-mlk-and-malcolm-x-influenced-each-other
  23. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  24. Hogg, M. A. (2005). All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others: Social identity and marginal membership. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social out-cast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection and bullying (pp. 243–261). Psychology Press.
  25. Hogg, M. A., Cooper-Shaw, L., & Holzworth, D. W. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293194010
  26. Hogg, M. A., & Gaffney, A. M. (2014). Prototype-based social comparisons within groups: Constructing social identity to reduce self-uncertainty. In Z. Križan & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.). Communal functions of social comparison (pp. 145–174). Cambridge University Press.
  27. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent informational influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139–182). Cambridge University Press.
  28. Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1101_6
  29. Hohman, Z. P., Gaffney, A. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2017). Who am I if I am not like my group? Self-uncertainty and feeling peripheral in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.002
  30. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202238378
  31. Joseph, P. E. (2020). The sword and the shield: the revolutionary lives of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. (First edition.). Basic Books.
  32. Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812
  33. Martin, R. (1988). Ingroup and outgroup minorities: Differential impact upon public and private responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180104
  34. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 237–326). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00005-6
  35. Moscovici, S. (1980). Towards a theory of conversion behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209–239). Academic Press.
  36. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. Academic Press.
  37. Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127
  38. Palomares, N. A., Giles, H., Soliz, J., Gallois, C. (2016). Intergroup accommodation, social categories and identities. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Papastamou, S., Gardikiotis, A., & Prodromitis, G. (2017). Majority and minority influence: Societal meaning and cognitive elaboration. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666648-5
  40. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E.H. Witte, J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour (Vol. 2, pp. 191-210). Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
  41. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  42. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
  43. Soliz, J., Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2022). Communication accommodation theory: Converging toward an understanding of communication adaptation in interpersonal relationships. In D. Braithewaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd. ed., pp. 130–142). Routledge.
  44. Soliz, J., Thorson, A. R., & Rittenour, C. E. (2009). Communicative correlates of satisfaction, family identity, and group salience in multiracial/ethnic families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00637.x
  45. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
  46. Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585–600.
  47. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Open University Press.
  48. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Basil Blackwell.
  49. van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25
  50. van Knippenberg, D., & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2023-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 173 - 198
Published on: Mar 21, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Amber M. Gaffney, Stephanie S. Souter, Jiin Jung, William D. Crano, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.