Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring the Human-AI Nexus: A Friendly Dispute Between Second-Order Cybernetical Ethical Thinking and Questions of AI Ethics Cover

Exploring the Human-AI Nexus: A Friendly Dispute Between Second-Order Cybernetical Ethical Thinking and Questions of AI Ethics

By:   
Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. Antonelli, P. (2008). Design and the elastic mind. Museum of Modern Art.
  2. Ashby, M. (2020a). Ethical regulators and super-ethical systems. Systems, 8(4), Article 53. DOI: 10.3390/systems8040053
  3. Ashby, M. (2020b). How to apply the ethical regulator theorem to crises. Acta Europeana Systemica, 8(1), 5358. DOI: 10.14428/aes.v8i1.56223
  4. Asimov, I. (1968). I, robot. Panther Books.
  5. Baecker, D. (2018). 4.0 oder die lücke die der rechner lässt [4.0 or the gap left by the computer]. Merve Verlag.
  6. Beabout, G., & Wennemann, D. (1993). Applied professional ethics: A developmental approach for use with case studies. University Press of America.
  7. Broecker, M. (2003). Between the lines: The part-of-the-world-position of Heinz von Foerster. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 10(2), 5165.
  8. Brownds, D. (2018, December 31). Yuval Harari— “21 Lessons…” abstracted—Part 1—The technological challenge. Deric’s Mindblog. https://mindblog.dericbownds.net/2018/12/yuval-harari-21-lessons-abstracted-part.html.
  9. Bluemink, M. (2020, January 23). Stiegler’s memory: Tertiary retention and temporal objects. 3:AM Magazine. https://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/stieglers-memory-tertiary-retention-and-temporal-objects/.
  10. Chintada, S. (2021, October 25). Addressing AI’s biggest problem: Trust. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/10/25/addressing-ais-biggest-problem-trust/.
  11. Descola, P. (2011). Jenseits von natur und kultur [Beyond nature and culture]. Suhrkamp.
  12. Fischer, T. (2019). Einführung [Introduction]. In S. Hoeltgen (Ed), Medientechnisches wissen: Band 2: Informatik, programmieren, kybernetik [Media technology knowledge: Volume 2: Computer science, programming, cybernetics] (pp. 275301). De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110496253-020
  13. Fitter, F. (n.d.). Unmasking unconscious bias in AI [Interview]. SAP. https://www.sap.com/insights/viewpoints/thinkers-unmasking-unconscious-bias-in-ai.html.
  14. Fitter, F., & Hunt, S. (n.d.). How AI can end bias: Artificial intelligence (AI) can help avoid harmful human bias, but only if we learn how to prevent AI bias as well. SAP. https://www.sap.com/uk/insights/viewpoints/how-ai-can-end-bias.html.
  15. Foerster, H. von. (1993). Kybernethik. Merve Verlag.
  16. Foerster, H. von. (2003). Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer.
  17. Ford, M. (2015). The rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of mass unemployment. Oneworld Publications.
  18. Franchi, S., Güzeldere, G., & Minch, E. (1995). Interview with Heinz von Foerster. Stanford Humanities Review, 4(2). http://web.archive.org/web/20000819134725/http:/www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/4-2/text/interviewvonf.html.
  19. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? [Working paper]. Oxford Martin Programme on Technology and Employment. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/the-future-of-employment/.
  20. Glanville, R. (2003). Machines of wonder and elephants that float in the air. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 10(3–4), 91105.
  21. Glanville, R. (2012). Radical constructivism = second order cybernetics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 19(4), 2742.
  22. Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press.
  23. Gorny, R. A., & Radman, A. (2022). From epiphylogenesis to general organology. Footprint, 16(1). DOI: 10.7480/footprint.16.1.6291
  24. Harari, Y. N. (2017a). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Penguin Random House. DOI: 10.17104/9783406704024
  25. Harari, Y. N. (2017b, September 22). Life 3.0 by Max Tegmark review—We are ignoring the AI apocalypse. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/22/life-30-max-tegmark-review.
  26. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
  27. Hu, M. (2020). Cambridge Analytica’s black box. Big Data & Society, 7(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951720938091
  28. Hui, Y. (2021). On the limit of artificial intelligence. Philosophy Today, 65(2), 339357. DOI: 10.5840/philtoday202149392
  29. Hutnyk, J. (2012). Proletarianisation. New Formations, 77, 127149. DOI: 10.3898/NEWF.77.08.2012
  30. Jākobsone, L. (2022). Critical transition design: The role of critical design in fostering sustainability [Summary of doctoral dissertation]. Art Academy of Latvia. https://www.lma.lv/uploads/news/3574/files/lienes-jakobsones-kopsavilkums.pdf.
  31. Kleber, C., & Anderson, A. (Writers & Directors) (2016, June 19). Schöne neue welt [Brave new world]. ECO Media GmbH; ZDF.
  32. Koering, D. (2018). The technobody: An animatronic artefact as manifestation of second-order cybernetics. In Annual convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB 2018): Liverpool, United Kingdom 4–6 April 2018. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence & Simulation of Behaviour; Curran Associates. https://www.proceedings.com/41519.html.
  33. Koering, D. (2019). Conscious city laboratory: Explorations in the history of computation, cybernetics, and architecture; foresight for artificial intelligence and human participation within cities [Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin]. DepositOnce: Technische Universität Berlin. DOI: 10.14279/depositonce-8466.
  34. Koering, D. (2021). What we should have learned from Cybersyn: An epistemological view on the socialist approach of Cybersyn in respective of Industry 4.0. In B. Vassileva, & M. Zwilling, Responsible AI and ethical issues for businesses and governments (pp. 6879). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4285-9.ch005
  35. Krippendorff, K. (2019, June 24–26). Agency, algorithms, new forms of oppression, and how cybernetics might respond [Paper presentation]. Acting Cybernetically: 2019 Conference of the American Society for Cybernetics, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhehTApQi1s.
  36. Levin, K., Cachore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123152. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0.
  37. Mills, A. (2017, September 26). Rise of the robots: Interview with Martin Ford. Michigan Tech. https://www.mtu.edu/unscripted/2017/09/rise-robots-interview-martin-ford.html.
  38. Madgwick, P. (2017, September 01). Revisiting Asimov’s three laws: Ethics for robots or researchers? Medium. https://medium.com/@philmadgwick/revisiting-asimovs-three-laws-ethics-for-robots-or-researchers-b9771b15a306.
  39. McDermott, J. (2014, February 10). Is your job safe in the second machine age? Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/c8901cc7-d879-3fb7-89ea-16aab9bec3e7.
  40. Medina, E. (2011). Cybernetic revolutionaries: Technology and politics in Allende’s Chile. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8417.001.0001
  41. Misselhorn, C. (2018). Grundfragen der maschinenethik [Basic questions of machine ethics]. Reclam.
  42. Muehl, S. (2022). Wir sind alle flechten. Von der cyborg-metapher zur symbiose der arten [We are all braids. From the cyborg metaphor to the symbiosis of species]. In S. Hurtig, CBRG.SPACE [Exhibition leaflet]. Zentrum für zeitgenössische Kunst, Leipzig. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366669807_Wir_sind_alle_Flechten_Von_der_Cyborg-Metapher_zur_Symbiose_der_Arten.
  43. Nefiodow, L., & Nefiodow, S. (2014). Über die Kondratieffzyklen [Kondratieff Cycles]. https://www.kondratieff.net/kondratieffcycles.
  44. O’Flaherty, K. (2022, January 29). What your smart TV knows about you—And how to stop it harvesting data. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/29/what-your-smart-tv-knows-about-you-and-how-to-stop-it-harvesting-data.
  45. O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Penguin.
  46. Pangaro, P. (2011). Invitation to recursioning: Heinz von Foerster and cybernetic praxis. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 18(3–4), 139142.
  47. Pangaro, P. (2021). Responding to the pandemic of “today’s AI” (Version V5.1 December 2021). https://tinyurl.com/newmacy-distro-r.
  48. Roberts, B. (2007). Introduction to Bernhard Stiegler. Parallax, 13(4), 2628. DOI: 10.1080/13534640701682776
  49. Rosling, H. (2018). Factfullness: Ten reasons we’re wrong about the world—And why things are better than you think. Sceptre Books.
  50. Rubin, C. T. (2018, June 28). Algorithmic man: Yuval Noah Harari’s timid transhumanism. Public Discourse. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2018/06/21562/.
  51. Scholte, T., & Sweeting, B. (2022). Possibilities for a critical cybernetics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(5), 986989. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2891
  52. Schwartz, E. M. (2010). Poverty reduction for profit? A critical assessment of the bottom-of-the-pyramid approach and of the ‘opportunities for the majority’- initiative of the Inter-American Development Bank [Master’s thesis, University Vienna]. U:theses: The theses repository of the University of Vienna. https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/9023#.
  53. Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503616738
  54. Stiegler, B. (2010a). Technics and time, 3: Cinematic time and the question of malaise. Stanford University Press.
  55. Stiegler, B. (2010b). For a new critique of political economy. Polity.
  56. Sweeting, B. (2019). Applying ethics to itself: Recursive ethical questioning in architecture and second-order cybernetics. Kybernetes, 48(4), 805815. DOI: 10.1108/K-12-2017-0471
  57. Sweeting, B., & Sutherland, S. (2022). Cybernetic transdisciplinarity as pedagogy. Proceedings of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, 66(1). https://journals.isss.org/index.php/jisss/article/view/4050.
  58. Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Allen Lane.
  59. Trappendreher, P. (2017, April 21). Der mensch als auslaufmodell [Man as a discontinued model]. Spektrum. https://www.spektrum.de/rezension/buchkritik-zu-homodeus/1451773.
  60. Trotsky, L. (2005). Literature and Revolution (W. Keach, Ed. & R. Strunsky, Trans.). Haymarket Books. (Original work published 1924).
  61. Ulgen, O. (2017). Kantian ethics in the age of artificial intelligence and robotics. QIL, Zoom-in, 43, 5983. http://www.qil-qdi.org/kantian-ethics-age-artificial-intelligence-robotics/.
  62. Wahlster, W., & Winterhalter, C. (Eds.) (2022). Deutsche normungsroadmap künstliche intelligenz, ausgabe 2 [German standardisation roadmap artificial intelligence, issue 2]. DIN; DKE. https://www.dke.de/de/arbeitsfelder/core-safety/normungsroadmap-ki.
  63. Webb, A. (2019). The big nine: How the tech titans and their thinking machines could warp humanity. PublicAffairs.
  64. Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society (2nd ed.). Doubleday Anchor Books.
  65. Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotaka, M. (2017). The case for an ethical black box. In Y. Gao, S. Fallah, Y. Jin & C. Lekakou (Eds.), Towards autonomous robotic systems: 18th annual conference, TAROS) 2017, Guildford, UK, July 19–21, 2017: Proceedings. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_21
  66. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. (2017). Report of COMEST on robotics ethics. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253952.
  67. Yudkowsky, E. (2008). Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk. In N. Bostrom, & M. M. Ćirković, Global catastrophic risks (pp. 308345). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58695/ec.4 | Journal eISSN: 2754-5512
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Submitted on: Feb 13, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 12, 2023
Published on: May 8, 2023
Published by: The Cybernetics Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Dietmar Koering, published by The Cybernetics Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.