Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Body composition assessment by bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury Cover

Body composition assessment by bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury

By: ERFBM Azevedo,  KC Alonso and  A Cliquet  
Open Access
|May 2016

Figures & Tables

Fig.1

Fat mass percentage (a) and BMI (b) of all groups. When groups were compared differences can be observed in fat mass for paraplegic inactive group X tetraplegic inactive group (p = 0.003) and tetraplegic inactive group X tetraplegic active group (p = 0.0019).
Fat mass percentage (a) and BMI (b) of all groups. When groups were compared differences can be observed in fat mass for paraplegic inactive group X tetraplegic inactive group (p = 0.003) and tetraplegic inactive group X tetraplegic active group (p = 0.0019).

BIA results comparing tetraplegic groups (active X inactive)_

VariablesTetraplegic inactiveTetraplegic activep value
Mean ± SDCIMean ± SDCI
Fat mass25.5923.74-11.224.82-0.0034
(kg)±2.9127.44±5.1617.62
Lean mass51.3745.23-52.1844.02-0.792
(kg)±9.6557.5±6.5860.34
TBW (%)73.0870.15-71.2469.75-0.916
±4.6276.02±1.272.73

BIA results comparing paraplegic inactive group and tetraplegic inactive group_

VariablesParaplegic inactiveTetraplegic inactivep value
Mean ± SDCIMean ± SDCI
Fat mass18.5914.4-25.5923.74-0.0084
(kg)±7.5822.79±2.9127.44
Lean mass58.8453.86-51.3745.23-0.083
(kg)±8.9963.82±9.6557.5
TBW (%)72.1570.4-73.0870.15-0.769
±3.1673.9±4.6276.02

BIA results comparing paraplegic groups (active X inactive)_

VariablesParaplegic inactiveParaplegic activep value
Mean ± SDCIMean ± SDCI
Fat mass18.5914.4-16.667.68-0.398
(kg)±7.5822.79±9.7125.64
Lean mass58.8453.86-64.1754.22-0.307
(kg)±8.9963.82±10.7674.13
TBW (%)72.1570.4-71.1169.11-0.549
±3.1673.9±2.1773.12

Anthropometric data_

Variables GroupsMeanAge (years)Mass (kg)Height (m)BMI (kg/m2)
Mean3280.811.8124.77
Paraplegic activeSD6.0617.190.074.24
CI26.4-64,91-1.74-20.85-
37.696.711.8628.69
Mean37.7377.431.7425.58
Paraplegic inactiveSD9.0915.120.074.64
CI32.7-69.06-1.7-1.7823.01-
42.7785.8128.16
Mean3463.41.7420.95
Tetraplegic activeSD8.319.610.032.89
CI23.69-51.47-1.7-1.7817.35-
44.3175.3324.54
Mean37.2576.981.7824.11
Tetraplegic inactiveSD9.9410.460.052.82
CI30.94-70.33-1.75-22.32-
43.5683.621.8225.89

BIA results comparing paraplegic active group and tetraplegic active group_

VariablesParaplegic activeTetraplegic activep value
Mean ± SDCIMean ± SDCI
Fat mass16.66 ±9.717.68-11.224.82-0.464
(kg)25.64±5.1617.62
Lean mass64.17±10.7654.22-52.1844.02-0.74
(kg)74.13±6.5860.34
TBW (%)71.11 ±2.1769.11-71.2469.75-0.463
73.12±1.272.73
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.2421 | Journal eISSN: 1891-5469
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 5
Submitted on: Sep 28, 2015
Published on: May 26, 2016
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 ERFBM Azevedo, KC Alonso, A Cliquet, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.