Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improving Conductivity Image Quality Using Block Matrix-based Multiple Regularization (BMMR) Technique in EIT: A Simulation Study Cover

Improving Conductivity Image Quality Using Block Matrix-based Multiple Regularization (BMMR) Technique in EIT: A Simulation Study

Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 2 (2011): Issue 1 (January 2011)
By: Tushar Kanti Bera,  Samir Kumar Biswas,  K. Rajan and  J. Nagaraju  
Open Access
|Jun 2011

References

  1. Webster JG, Electrical impedance tomography. Adam Hilger Series of Biomedical Engineering, Adam Hilger, New York, USA 1990.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Cheney M, David Isaacson, Jonathan C. Newell. Electrical Impedance Tomography. SIAM Review, 41(1), 85–101, 1999. 10.1137/S003614459833361310.1137/S0036144598333613
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bayford RH. Bioimpedance Tomography (Electrical Impedance Tomography). Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 8, 63-91, 2006. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.0957161683455210.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095716
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Denyer CWL, Electronics for Real-Time and Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomographs, PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, 1996
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Chen Z, Brown EN and Barbieri R. Assessment of Autonomic Control and Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Using Point Process Models of Human Heart Beat Dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 56(7), 1791-1802, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Fabrizi L , McEwan A, Oh T, Woo EJ, Holder DS. An electrode addressing protocol for imaging brain function with electrical impedance tomography using a 16-channel semi-parallel system. Physiol. Meas., 30, S85–S101, 2009. 10.1088/0967-3334/30/6/S06
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bagshaw AP, Liston AD, Bayford RH, Tizzard A, Gibson AP, Tidswell AT, Sparkes MK, Dehghani H, Binnie CD and Holder DS. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method. NeuroImage 20, 752–764, 2003. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00301-X1456844910.1016/S1053-8119(03)00301-X
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Murphy D, Burton P, Coombs R, Tarassenko L and Rolfe P. Impedance Imaging in the Newborn. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 8, Suppl. A, 131-40, 1987.10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/0173568562
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Hinz J, Neumann P, Dudykevych T, Andersson LG, Wrigge H, Burchardi H, and Hedenstierna G. Regional Ventilation by Electrical Impedance Tomography: A Comparison With Ventilation Scintigraphy in Pigs. Chest, 124, 314–322, 2003. 10.1378/chest.124.1.31410.1378/chest.124.1.31412853539
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Noordegraaf AV, Faes TJC, Janse A, Marcus JT, Heethaar RM, Postmus PE and de Vries PMJM. Improvement of cardiac imaging in electrical impedance tomography by means of a new electrode configuration. Physiol. Meas., 17, 179–188, 1996. 10.1088/0967-3334/17/3/004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Hope TA and Iles SE. Technology review: The use of electrical impedance scanning in the detection of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res., 6, 69-74, 2004. 10.1186/bcr74414979909
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Dickin F and Wang M. Electrical resistance tomography for process applications. Meas. Sci. and Technol., 7, 247, 1996. 10.1088/0957-0233/7/3/005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Stephensona DR, Rodgersa TL, Manna R and York TA. Application of Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography to Investigate Fluid Mixing in a Stirred Vessel. 13th European Conference on Mixing, London, 14-17 April 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Kotre CJ. Subsurface electrical impedance imaging: measurement strategy, image reconstruction and in vivo results. Physiol. Meas., 17, A197–A204, 1996. 10.1088/0967-3334/17/4A/024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Linderholm P, Marescot L, Loke MH, and Renaud P. Cell Culture Imaging Using Microimpedance Tomography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 55(1), 138-146, 2008. 10.1109/TBME.2007.91064910.1109/TBME.2007.910649
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Denyer CWL. Electronics for real-time and three-dimensional electrical impedance tomographs. PhD Thesis Oxford Brookes University, January 1996.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Huang CN, Yu FM and Chung HY. The Scanning Data Collection Strategy for Enhancing the Quality of Electrical Impedance Tomography. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation And Measurement, 57(6), 1193-1198, 2008. 10.1109/TIM.2007.91514910.1109/TIM.2007.915149
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Metherall P. Three Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography of the Human Thorax. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, January 1998.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Brown BH. Medical impedance tomography and process impedance tomography: a brief review. Measurement Science & Technology, 12, 991-996, 2001. 10.1088/0957-0233/12/8/30110.1088/0957-0233/12/8/301
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hou WD, and Mo YL. Increasing image resolution in electrical impedance tomography. Electronics Letters, 38, 701-702, 2002. 10.1049/el:2002047710.1049/el:20020477
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. Studying the Boundary Data Profile of A Practical Phantom for Medical Electrical Impedance Tomography with Different Electrode Geometries. Proceedings of The World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering-2009 Sept 7–12, 2009, Munich, Germany, IFMBE Proceedings 25/II, pp. 925–929. 10.1007/978-3-642-03879-2_258
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. A Stainless Steel Electrode Phantom to Study the Forward Problem of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). Sensors & Transducers Journal, 104(5), 33-40, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. A Simple Instrumentation Calibration Technique for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) Using A 16 Electrode Phantom. Proceedings of The Fifth Annual IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (IEEE CASE 2009), Bangalore, August 22 to 25, pp. 347-352. 10.1109/COASE.2009.5234117
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Holder DS, Hanquan Y and Rao A. Some practical biological phantoms for calibrating multifrequency electrical impedance tomography. Physiol. Meas., 17, A167-A177, 1996. 10.1088/0967-3334/17/4A/02110.1088/0967-3334/17/4A/0219001615
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. Resistivity Imaging of a Reconfigurable Phantom With Circular Inhomogeneities in 2D-Electrical Impedance Tomography. Measurement, 44(3), 518-526, 2011. 10.1016/j.measurement.2010.11.01510.1016/j.measurement.2010.11.015
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. A Reconfigurable Practical Phantom for Studying the 2 D Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) Using a FEM Based Forward Solver, 10th International Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT 2009), School of Mathematics, The University of Manchester, UK, 16th-19th June 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Lionheart WRB. EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments. Physiol. Meas., 25, 125–142, 2004. 10.1088/0967-3334/25/1/021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Kolehmainen V, Vauhkonen M, Karjalainen PA, Kaipio JP. Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns. Physiol Meas. 18(4), 289-303, 1997. 10.1088/0967-3334/18/4/003941386310.1088/0967-3334/18/4/003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. A Study of Practical Biological Phantoms with Simple Instrumentation for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). Proceedings of IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC2009), Singapore, 5th - 7th May 2009, pp 511-516. 10.1109/IMTC.2009.5168503
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Riu PJ, Rosell J, Lozano A and Pallà-Areny R. Multi-frequency static imaging in electrical impedance tomography: Part 1 instrumentation requirements. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 33(6), 784-792, 1995. 10.1007/BF02523010855895110.1007/BF02523010
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. A Multifrequency Constant Current Source for Medical Electrical Impedance Tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology 2010 (IEEE ICSMB 2010), 16th-18th Dec’2010, Kharagpur, India, pp-290-295. 10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735387
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Loh WW, Pinheiro PAT, Dickin FJ and Waterfall RC. Low common mode error data collection strategy for electrical resistance tomography. Electronics Letters, 34(15), 1998. 10.1049/el:19980846
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt Jr. EM and Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2nd edition, 2001.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Kim MC, Kim S, Kim KY and Lee YJ. Regularization Methods in Electrical Impedance Tomography Technique for The Two-Phase Flow Visualization. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer, 28(6), 173-782, 2001. 10.1016/S0735-1933(01)00281-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Soleimani M and Lionheart WRB. Nonlinear image reconstruction in electrical capacitance tomography using experimental data. Meas. Sci. Technol., 16(10), 1987–1996, 2005. 10.1088/0957-0233/16/10/01410.1088/0957-0233/16/10/014
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Niu H., Guo P., Ji L., Zhao Q. and Jiang T. Improving image quality of diffuse optical tomography with a projection-error-based adaptive regularization method. Optics Express, 16(17), 12423, 2008. 10.1364/OE.16.0124231871147910.1364/OE.16.012423
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Biswas SK, Rajan K, Vasu RM. Regional sub-block matrices based multiple regularization and biomedical image reconstruction. Systems in Medicine and Biology (ICSMB), 2010 International Conference on, 16-18 Dec. 2010, pp 61 - 66.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Biswas SK, Rajan K, Vasu RM. Diffuse optical tomographic imager using a single light source. J. Appl. Phys., 105(2), 024702, 2009. 10.1063/1.304001610.1063/1.3040016
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Yorkey TJ. Comparing reconstruction methods for electrical impedance tomography, PhD thesis, University of. Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI 53706, 1986.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Holder DS. Electrical impedance tomography: methods, history and applications. (Series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering), Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd., 2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Grootveld CJ. Measuring and Modeling of Concentrated Settling Suspensions Using Electrical Impedance Tomography. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1996.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Adler A, Guardo R. Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection. IEEE Trans. Med Imag., 15(2), 170- 179, 1996. 10.1109/42.49141810.1109/42.491418
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Pogue BW, Willscher C, McBride TO, Osterberg UL, and Paulsen KD. Contrast-detail analysis for detection and characterization with near-infrared diffuse tomography. Med. Phys., 27, 2693-2700, 2000. 10.1118/1.13239841119095210.1118/1.1323984
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Bera TK and Nagaraju J. A FEM-Based Forward Solver for Studying the Forward Problem of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) with A Practical Biological Phantom. Proceedings of IEEE International Advance Computing Conference' 2009 (IEEE IACC - 2009), 6-7th March 2009, Patiala, Punjab, India, pp 1375 - 1381. 10.1109/IADCC.2009.4809217
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Reddy JN. An Introduction to the Finite Element Method. 3rd Ed., 2nd Reprint, TATA McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. Ltd, 2006.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Graham BM. Enhancements in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa, April 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Arridge SR. Optical tomography in medical imaging. Inverse Problems, 15, R41–R93, 1999. 10.1088/0266-5611/15/2/02210.1088/0266-5611/15/2/022
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Bera TK, Biswas SK, Rajan K and Nagaraju J. Improving Image Quality in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) Using Projection Error Propagation-Based Regularization (PEPR) Technique: A Simulation Study. Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance, 2, 2–12, 2011. 10.5617/jeb.158
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.170 | Journal eISSN: 1891-5469
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 47
Submitted on: Mar 30, 2011
Published on: Jun 15, 2011
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
EIT,
MoBIIR,
Jacobian,
Block Matrix-based Multiple Regularization (BMMR),
simulated boundary data,
conductivity imaging,
STR,
LMR,
normalized projection error,
normalized solution error
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Bioengineering and biomedical engineering,
Biomedical electronics,
Physics,
Spectroscopy and metrology,
Life sciences,
Biophysics,
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering

© 2011 Tushar Kanti Bera, Samir Kumar Biswas, K. Rajan, J. Nagaraju, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2 (2011): Issue 1 (January 2011)Next article