The Role of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness on Personality Traits among Adults
References
- Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision sciences, 30(2), 361–391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
- Aksay, K. (2015). Örgüt Yapılarında Yaşanan Değişimler ve Modern Örgüt Tiplerinin İncelenmesi. Kent Akademisi, 8(23), 111–128.
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kent/issue/34397/379892 - Alajlan, N., Hadwan, M., & Ibrahim, D. M. (2022). Effectiveness of Adopting Cloud-Based E-Learning at Qassim University. The Computer Journal, 65(5), 1098–1106. DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxaa146
- Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1962-04728-000 - Anshari, M., bin Alas, Y., & Guan, L. S. (2015). Pervasive knowledge, social networks, and cloud computing: e-learning 2.0. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 909–921. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1360a
- Arts, J. W. C., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: a meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behaviour. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (2), 134–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002
- Bai, S., Hao, B., Li, A., Yuan, S., Gao, R., & Zhu, T. (2013). Predicting Big Five Personality Traits of Microblog Users. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT). DOI: 10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.70
- Barnett, T., Pearson, W. A., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 374–390. DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2014.10
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2000).
Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability . In E. A. Locke (Ed.). Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior. Blackwell Publishing. - Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
- Bollen, K. A. (1990). Political Democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps. Studies in comparative international development, 25(1), 7–24. DOI: 10.1007/BF02716903
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993).
Alternative ways of assessing model fit . In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage. - Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. DOI: 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
- Correa, T., Hinsley, A., & Ziga, H. (2010). Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(2), 247–253. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
- Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
- Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887–898. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI: 10.2307/249008
- Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008). How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information System Research, 19(1), 93–105. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1070.0153
- DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of personality, 73(4), 825–858. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x
- Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
- Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., Ramdani, B., Niranjan, S., & Weerakkody, V. (2011). Understanding factors for successful adoption of Web 2.0 applications. Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1262&context=ecis2011 - Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and individual differences, 12(8), 773–790. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90144-Z
- Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., Johnson, M., Alves, G. R., Minovic, M., & Conde-Gonzales, M. A. (2014). Informal learning recognition through a cloud ecosystem. Future Generation Computer Systems, 32, 282–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2013.08.004
- Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of the markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42.
https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1992-25730-001 . DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 - Google Apps for Education. (2015).
https://edu.google.com/intl/tr/?modal_active=none - Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
- Gunel, O. D. (2010). Isletmelerde yıldırma olgusu ve yıldırma magdurlarının kisilik ozelliklerine iliskin bir arastırma [Mobbing in organizations and a research on mobbing victims’ personality characteristics]. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi [Dokuz Eylul University Social Science Institute Journal], 12, 37–65.
https://acikerisim.deu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12397/5646 - Hamutoglu, N. B. (2018). Bulut bilişim teknolojileri kabul modeli 3: ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(2), 8–25. DOI: 10.19126/suje.297586
- Heller, D., Judge, T., & Watson, D. (2002). The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23(7), 815–835. DOI: 10.1002/job.168
- Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
- Huang, Y. M., Chen, H. C., Hwang, J. P., & Huang, Y. M. (2013).
Application of cloud technology, social networking sites and sensing technology to e-learning . In Reshaping learning (pp. 343–364). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32301-0_15 - Jackson, J. D., Mun, Y. Y., & Park, J. S. (2013). An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Information & Management, 50(4), 154–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2013.02.006
- Jacques, P. H., Garger, J., Brown, C. A., & Deale, C. S. (2009). Personality and virtual reality team candidates: The roles of personality traits, technology anxiety and trust as predictors of perceptions of virtual reality teams. Journal of Business and Management, 15(2), 143.
https://www.chapman.edu/business/_files/journals-and-essays/jbm-editions/jbm-vol-15-02.pdf#page=39 - Jeong, H. I., & Kim, Y. (2016). The acceptance of computer technology by teachers in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 496–512. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1143376
- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific International Software, Inc.
- Kalogiannakis, M. (2010). Training with ICT for ICT from the trainee’s perspective. A local ICT teacher training experience. Education and Information Technologies, 15(1), 3–17.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-008-9079-3 . DOI: 10.1007/s10639-008-9079-3 - Kamyab, M., & Delafrooz, N. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Personality Traits, Subjective Norms and Perceptions of Customers on using Internet Banking. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i1/73400
- Kaufman, J. C., Agars, M. D., & Lopez-Wagner, M. C. (2008). The role of personality and motivation in predicting early college academic success in non-traditional students at a Hispanic-serving institution. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 492–496. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.004
- Kelly, M., & James, C. M. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings and regret. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 267–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009
- Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, 15, 15–30.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
- Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. J. (2005). The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 557–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.013
- Kuba, J. (2014). Konstruktová validita Bochumského osobnostního dotazníku: Motivační dimenze. Testfórum, 4, 74–83. DOI: 10.5817/TF2014-4-19
- Li, C. Y. (2016). Understanding University Students’ System Acceptance Behavior: The Roles of Personality Trait and Subjective Norms. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 12(3), 106–125. DOI: 10.4018/IJTHI.2016070107
- Lu, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019). Exploring the emotional antecedents and outcomes of technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 153–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.056
- Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., Lixandroiu, R. C., & Dovleac, L. (2019). A study on academic staff personality and technology acceptance: The case of communication and collaboration applications. Computers & Education, 128, 113–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.010
- Marino, C., Vieno, A., Lenzi, M., Fernie, B. A., Nikčević, A. V., & Spada, M. M. (2018). Personality traits and metacognitions as predictors of positive mental health in college students. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 19(2), 365–379. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9825-y
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360. DOI: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1
- McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa,
Jr. P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509 - Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. DOI: 10.1287/isre.2.3.192
- Nistor, N., Gögüş, A., & Lerche, T. (2013). Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: a European study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 733–749.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-013-9292-7 . DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9292-7 - Özbek, V., Alnıaçık, Ü., Koc, F., Akkılıç, M. E., & Kaş, E. (2014). The impact of personality on technology acceptance: A study on smart phone users. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 541–551. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.073
- Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
- Pearson, M., & Naylor, S. (2006). Changing contexts: teacher professional development and ICT pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 283–291.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-006-9013-5 . DOI: 10.1007/s10639-006-9013-5 - Prestridge, S. (2010).
The alignment of digital pedagogy to current teacher beliefs . Paper presented at ACEC2010: Digital Diversity. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Computers in Education.https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/143862718.pdf - Punnoose, A. C. (2012). Determinants of Intention to Use eLearning Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 302–337.
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111507 . DOI: 10.28945/1744 - Reed, W. M., Ayersman, D. J., & Liu, M. (1996). The effect of students’ computer-based prior experiences and instructional exposures on the application of hypermedia-related mental models. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 175–197. DOI: 10.2190/TVP7-KDD3-MHKP-6AHW
- Rivers, D. J. (2021). The role of personality traits and online academic self-efficacy in acceptance, actual use and achievement in Moodle. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4353–4378. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10478-3
- Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
- Rosen, P. A., & Kluemper, D. H. (2008). The Impact of the Big Five Personality Traits on the Acceptance of Social Networking Website. AMCIS Proceedings, 274.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1276&context=amcis2008 - Saadé, R. G., Kira, D., Nebebe, F., & Otrakji, C. (2006). Openness to Experience: An HCI Experiment. Issues in informing science & information technology, 3.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.381.7465&rep=rep1&type=pdf . DOI: 10.28945/2944 - Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2007). Mediating the impact of technology usage on perceived ease of use by anxiety. Computers & education, 49(4), 1189–1204. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.009
- Sanders, A. (2008). Using personality traits to predict police officer performance Policing. An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(1), 129–147. DOI: 10.1108/13639510810852611
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.509.4258&rep=rep1&type=pdf - Siddiquei, N. L., & Khalid, R. (2018). The relationship between Personality Traits, Learning Styles and Academic Performance of E-Learners. Open Praxis, 10(3), 249–263. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.10.3.870
- Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS quarterly, 679–704. DOI: 10.2307/25148745
- Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
- Svendsen, B. G., Johnsen, K. J., Almås-Sørensen, L., & Vittersø, J. (2013). Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(4), 323–334. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.553740
- Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 197–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00834.x
- Teh, P.-L., Yong, C.-C., Chong, C.-W., & Yew, S.-Y. (2011). Do the big five personality factors affect knowledge sharing behaviour? A study of Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 47–62.
https://mjlis.um.edu.my/article/view/6682 - Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2108–2122. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005
- Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed work groups and the big five personality dimensions: Summary. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 349–362. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199607)17:4<;349::AID-JOB756>3.0.CO;2-3
- Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Building the ICT capacity of the next generation of teachers in Asia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 1057–1060. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.810
- Uffen, J., Kaemmerer, N., & Breitner, M. H. (2013). Personality traits and cognitive determinants — an empirical investigation of the use of smartphone security measures. Journal of Information Security, 10, 203–212. DOI: 10.4236/jis.2013.44023
- Utami, I. Q., Fahmiyah, I., Ningrum, R. A., Fakhruzzaman, M. N., Pratama, A. I., & Triangga, Y. M. (2022). Teacher’s acceptance toward cloud-based learning technology in Covid-19 pandemic era. Journal of Computers in Education, 9, 571–586. DOI: 10.1007/s40692-021-00214-8
- Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
- Venkatesh, V., & Susan, A. B. (2001). A Longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes – adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102. DOI: 10.2307/3250959
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. DOI: 10.2307/30036540
- Wang, H. I., & Yang, H. L. (2005). The role of personality traits in UTAUT model under online stocking. Contemporary Management Research, 1(1), 69–82. DOI: 10.7903/cmr.73
- Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. DOI: 10.3102/00346543072002131
- Xua, R., Freya, R. M., Fleischa, E., & Ilicb, A. (2016). Understanding the impact of personality traits on mobile app adoption – Insights from a large-scale field study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62, 244–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.011
- Zmud, R. W., & Apple, R. E. (1992). Measuring Technology Incorporation/Infusion. Journal of product Innovation Management, 9, 148–155. DOI: 10.1016/0737-6782(92)90006-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.14.2.142 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 147
Submitted on: Sep 14, 2021
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2022
Published on: Dec 9, 2022
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Hursit Cem Salar, Nazire Burcin Hamutoglu, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.