References
- 1 Lavaf-Pour Y, Meraz F. MetaPhysics of architecture: An integral theory framework for sustainability. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2023; 8(1): 5.
- 2 Betancour A, Vesterlund C-J. Green imaginaries. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2023; 8(1): 4.
- 3 Mosley J, Crociani-Windland L, Warren S, Williams N. Architecture on the couch: A transdisciplinary exploration of buildings as psychological subjects. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2023; 8(1): 3.
- 4 Jones M, Vowles H, PrescottL, Orchard-Webb J, Doron H. Educating radical practitioners: A case study of regenerative design on a UK high street. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2023; 8(1): 7.
- 5 Grimes E. Thinking and being otherwise: Liberatory environmental justice and the ‘Black Metropolis’. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2023; 8(1): 6.
- 6 Guerra-Santin O, Tweed AC, Zapata-Lancaster MG. Learning from design reviews in low energy buildings. Structural Survey. 2014; 32(3): 246–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-08-2013-0030
- 7 Royal Institute of British Architects. Sustainable Outcomes Guide. RIBA; 2019.
- 8 Architects Registration Board. ARB Competence Guidelines: Sustainability. ARB; 2021.
- 9
Bouw en Techniek Innovatiecentrum.
Kennis-en Innovatieprogramma: Circulair Ontwerpen voor Gebouwen en Infrastructuur.
Building and Technology Innovation Centre, BTIC Delft;
2021. Available at:
https://tki-bouwentechniek.nl/wp-content/uploads/Kenns-en-Innovatieprogramma_BTIC_CirculairOntwerpen_02022021.pdf - 10 World Green Building Council. Advancing Net Zero Status Report. WGBC; 2022.
- 11 United Kingdom Green Building Council. Impact Report 2021-22. UKGBC; 2022.
- 12 London Energy Transformation Initiative. Climate Emergency Design Guide. LETI; 2020.
- 13 Climate Change Committee 2022. Progress Report to Parliament. CCC; 2022.
- 14 United Nations. The Closing Window: Climate Crisis Calls for Rapid Transformation of Societies. UN Environment Programme; 2022.
- 15 Förster K (ed.). Environmental Histories of Architecture. Canadian Centre for Architecture; 2022.
- 16 Moe K, Friedman DS. All is lost: Notes on broken world design. Places Journal. October 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22269/201013.
- 17 Moe K. Building agnotology. Journal of Architectural Education. 2021; 75(1): 10–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2021.1859878.
- 18
Leblanc M, Catros A.
Path-dependency as a potential cause for the disjunction between theory and tools in the modelled reality of sustainable architecture . In: Walker T, Wendt S, Goubran S, Schwartz T (eds.). Business and Policy Solutions to Climate Change. Palgrave Macmillan; 2022: 291–310. - 19 Peters T, Verderber S. Territories of engagement in the design of ecohumanist healthcare environments. HERD: Health Environments Research and Design Journal. 2017; 10 (2): 104–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586716668635
- 20
Armstrong
R.
Soft Living Architecture: An Alternative View of Bio-Informed Practice
Bloomsbury Publishing ; 2020. - 21> Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice Earthscan; 2010.
- 22>
Radical Architecture Practice for Sustainability (RAPS) agenda
Available at:
https://www.rapsresearch.com/ - 23> Spence C. Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2020; 5(1): 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
- 24> McPhearson T, Raymond CM, Gulsrud N, Albert C, Coles N, Fagerholm N, et al. Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good anthropocene npj Urban Sustainability. 2021; 1(5): 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x
- 25> Cielemęcka O, Daigle C. Posthuman Sustainability: An ethos for our anthropocenic future. Theory, Culture and Society. 2019; 36(7-8): 67–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419873
- 26 Apostolopoulou E, Cortes-Vazquez JA (eds.). The Right to Nature: Social Movements, Environmental Justice and Neoliberal Natures. Routledge; 2018.
- 27 Väänänen N, Pöllänen S. Conceptualizing sustainable craft: Concept analysis of literature. The Design Journal. 2020; 23(2); 263–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1718276.
- 28 Camere S, Karana E. Fabricating materials from living organisms: An emerging design practice. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 186: 570–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.081.
- 29 Schweber L, Leiringer R. Beyond the technical: A snapshot of energy and buildings research. Building Research and Information. 2012; 40(4): 481–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.675713
- 30 Hu S, Yan D, Azar E, Guo F. A systematic review of occupant behaviour in building energy policy. Building and Environment. 2020; 175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106807
- 31 Ardeshir M, Berger C, Amin H, Ampatzi E, Andersen RK, Azar E, et al. Barthelmes VM. The role of occupants in buildings’ energy performance gap: Myth or reality? Sustainability. 2021; 13(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146
- 32 Oliveira S, Badarnah L, Barakat M, Chatzimichali A, Atkins E. Beyond energy services: A multidimensional and cross-disciplinary agenda for home energy management research. Energy Research and Social Science. 2022; 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102347.
- 33 Yaneva A. Making the social hold: Towards an actor-network theory of design. Design and Culture. 2009; 1(3): 273–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/174967809X12556950208826
- 34 Schroeder T. Giving meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices: Setting out the analytical framework of translation. Sustainability. 2018; 10(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061710
- 35 Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press; 2007.
- 36 Bennett J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press; 2010.
- 37 DeLanda M. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum; 2006.
- 38 Walker G, Karvonen A, Guy S. Zero carbon homes and zero carbon living: Sociomaterial interdependencies in carbon governance. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2015; 40(4): 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12090
- 39 Blok A. Urban green assemblages: An ANT view on sustainable city building projects. Science and Technology Studies. 2013; 26(1): 5–24.
- 40 Morton T. The Ecological Thought. Harvard University Press;. 2012.
- 41 West S, Haider L, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S. Putting relational thinking to work in sustainability science: Reply to Raymond et al. Ecosystems and People. 2021; 17(1): 108–113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1898477.
- 42 Alves S. Understanding intangible aspects of cultural heritage: The role of active imagination. The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice. 2018; 9(3-4): 207–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2018.1517141.
- 43 Corbin H. Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth. Princeton University Press; 1997.
- 44 AdamsS. Cornelius Castoriadis: Key Concepts. Bloomsbury Academic; 2014.
- 45 Lohman DF. Spatial ability and g. In: Dennis I, Tapsfield P (eds.). Human Abilities: Their Nature and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996: 97–116.
- 46 Thomas JA. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge; 2014.
- 47 Gabe-Thomas E, Walker I, Verplanken B, Shaddick G. Householders’ mental models of domestic energy consumption: Using a sort-and-cluster method to identify shared concepts of appliance similarity. PloS one. 2016; 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158949.
- 48 Hajer M, Versteeg W. Imagining the post-fossil city: Why is it so difficult to think of new possible worlds? Territory, Politics, Governance. 2019; 7(2): 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1510339.
- 49 Rahm P. Meteorological architecture. Architectural Design. 2009; 79(3): 30–41.
- 50 Moe K. Convergence: An Architectural Agenda for Energy. Routledge; 2013.
- 51 Guy S, Moore SA. Sustainable architecture and the pluralist imagination. Journal of Architectural Education. 2007; 60(4): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00104.x.
- 52 Cazden C, Cope B, Fairclough , Gee J, Kalantzis M, Kress G, et al. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review. 1996; 66(1): 60–92.
- 53 Schneider T, Till J. Beyond discourse: Notes on spatial agency. Footprint. 2009; 4: 97–112. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.3.1.702.
- 54 Deleuze G, Guattari F, Schwibs B, Vogl J. Was ist philosophie? Suhrkamp; 2000.
- 55 Delong J. Raising voice using dialogue as a research method for creating living-educational-theories in cultures of inquiry. Educational Journal of Living Theories. 2020; 13(2): 71–92.
- 56 Blaikie N. Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge. Polity; 2007.
- 57 Jabareen Y. Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2009; 8(4): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406.