References
- 1Liekens J. Architecture’s Poetic Instrumentality: Developing the Critical, Political, and Ethical Capacities of Architectural Artifacts. PhD dissertation. KU Leuven Faculty of Architecture, Campus Sint-Lucas & Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering; 2020.
- 2Groat LN, Wang, D. Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley; 2013.
- 3Fallman D.
The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration . In Design Issues, 24(3). MIT Press; 2008: 4–10. DOI: 10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4 - 4Aureli PV.
Can Architecture be Political? In: The Architecture Exchange Series #2, Talk #3. Architecture Exchange; 2014. - 5Yaneva A. Mapping Controversies in Architecture. Routledge; 2012.
- 6Mouffe C.
Democracy Revisited (in conversation with Chantal Mouffe) . In: Miessen M (ed.). The Nightmare of Participation. Sternberg Press; 2010. - 7Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press; 1981.
- 8Dovey K.
I Mean to Be Critical, But … . In: Rendell J et al (eds). Critical Architecture. Routledge; 2007: 252–260. - 9Findeli A.
Searching for Design Research Questions: Some Conceptual Clarifications . In Chow R, Jonas W, Gesche J (eds). Questions, Hypotheses & Conjectures: Discussions on Projects by Early Stage and Senior Research Designers. Universe; 2010: 286–303. - 10Janssens N. Utopia-Driven Projective Research: A Design Approach to Explore the Theory and Practice of Meta-Urbanism. PhD dissertation. Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering; 2012.
- 11Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press; 2007. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
- 12Haraway D. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press; 2016. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
- 13Dyrssen C.
Precision: The Compositional Accuracy of Artistic Judgement . In: Nilsson F, Dunin-Woyseth H, Janssens N (eds). Perspectives on Research Assessment in Architecture, Music and the Arts: Discussing Doctorateness. Routledge; 2017: 175–189. DOI: 10.4324/9781315526652-12 - 14Rendell J. Architectural Research and Disciplinarity. In Architectural Research Quarterly. 2004; 8(2): 141–147. DOI: 10.1017/S135913550400017X
- 15Cross N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer-Verlag; 2006.
- 16Borgdorff H.
The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research . In: Biggs M, Karlsson H (eds). The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. Routledge; 2010: 44–63. - 17Rust C, Mottram J, Till J. Review of Practice-led Research in Art, Design & Architecture. Arts and Humanities Research Council; 2007.
- 18Downton P. Design Research. RMIT University Press; 2003.
- 19Frayling C, et al. Practice-based Doctorates in the Creative and Performing Arts and Design. UK Council for Graduate Education; 1997.
- 20Dunin-Woyseth H, Nilsson F. Building a Culture of Doctoral Scholarship in Architecture and Design: A Belgian-Scandinavian Case. In: Nordic Journal of Architectural Research. 2011; 23(1): 41–55.
- 21Law J. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge; 2004.
- 22Rancière J. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Continuum; 2010. DOI: 10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001
- 23Van Toorn R.
Aesthetics as a Form of Politics . In: Seijdel J, Melis L (eds). Open! Art, Culture & the Public Domain. NAI 010 Publishers; 2006: 54–61. - 24McNeill W.
Design and the Enigma of the World . In: Willis AM (ed.). Design Philosophy Papers. 2006; (2). DOI: 10.2752/144871306X13966268131550 - 25Rancière J.
The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics . In: Bowman P, Stamp R (eds). Reading Rancière. Continuum; 2011: 1–17. DOI: 10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001 - 26Goodman N. Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing Company; 1978.