References
- 1Cheng HD, Shi XJ, Min R, Hu LM, Cai XP, Du HN. Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognition. 2006; 39:646-68.10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006ChengHDShiXJMinRHuLMCaiXPDuHNApproaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammogramsPattern Recognition20063964668
- 2Wahid MI. Breast cancer. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Oncological Society. [online] 2007. [cited on 2008 Feb 06]. Available from: http://www.malaysiaoncology.orgWahidMIBreast cancerKuala Lumpur:Malaysian Oncological Society. [online] 2007cited
2008Feb06 Available fromhttp://www.malaysiaoncology.org - 3Wilson M, Hargrave R, Mitra S, Shieh Y-Y, Roberson GH. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammograms through application of image pixel remapping and statistical filter. 11th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems; June 12-14, 1998.WilsonMHargraveRMitraSShiehYYRobersonGHAutomated detection of microcalcifications in mammograms through application of image pixel remapping and statistical filter11th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems; June 12-141998
- 4Kang HK, Ro YM, Kim SM. A microcalcification detection using adaptive contrast enhancement on wavelet transform and neural network. IEICE Trans Inf Syst. March 1, 2006; E89-D:1280-7.10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1280KangHKRoYMKimSMA microcalcification detection using adaptive contrast enhancement on wavelet transform and neural networkIEICE Trans Inf Syst. March 12006E89-D12807
- 5Beam V, Sullivan D, Layde P. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 1996; 3:891-7.895917810.1016/S1076-6332(96)80296-0BeamVSullivanDLaydePEffect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammographyAcad Radiol199638917
- 6Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology. 1994; 191:241-4.10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134580ThurfjellELLernevallKATaubeAASBenefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening programRadiology19941912414
- 7Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology. 2000; 215:554-62.1079693910.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma15554Warren BurhenneLJWoodSAD’OrsiCJPotential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammographyRadiology200021555462
- 8Vomweg T, Buscema M, Kauczor H, Teifke A, Intraligi M, Terzi S, et al. Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrastenhanced MR-mammography. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 2350-9.10.1118/1.1600871VomwegTBuscemaMKauczorHTeifkeAIntraligiMTerziSet alImproved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrastenhanced MR-mammographyMed Phys20033023509
- 9Tyan SG. Median filtering, deterministic properties. In: Huang ITS, editor. Two dimensional digital signal processing. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1981.TyanSG
Median filtering, deterministic properties HuangITSTwo dimensional digital signal processingBerlinSpringer Verlag1981 - 10Umbaugh SE. Computer imaging: digital image analysis and processing. NewYork: CRC Press; 2005.UmbaughSEComputer imaging:digital image analysis and processingNewYorkCRC Press2005
- 11Haralick RM. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. IEEE Trans Image Processing. 1979; 67: 786-804.HaralickRMStatistical and structural approaches to textureIEEE Trans Image Processing197967786804
- 12Pedrycz W. Fuzzy sets in pattern recognition: methodology and methods. Pattern Recognition. 1990; 23:121-46.10.1016/0031-3203(90)90054-OPedryczWFuzzy sets in pattern recognition:methodology and methodsPattern Recognition19902312146
- 13Wang WJ, Luoh L. Simple computation for the defuzzification of center of sum and center of gravity. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 2000; 9:53-9.WangWJLuohLSimple computation for the defuzzification of center of sum and center of gravityJournal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems20009539
- 14Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-74.84357110.2307/2529310LandisJRKochGGThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical dataBiometrics19773315974
- 15Li H, Wang Y, Liu KJR, Lo SCB, Freedman MT. Computerized radiographic mass detection. II. Decision support by featured database visualization and modular neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2001; 20:302-13.10.1109/42.92147911370897LiHWangYLiuKJRLoSCBFreedmanMTComputerized radiographic mass detection. II. Decision support by featured database visualization and modular neural networksIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging20012030213
- 16Bovis K, Singh S, Fieldsend J, Pinder C, editors. Identification of masses in digital mammograms with MLP and RBF nets. Neural Networks 2000, IJCNN 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference; 2000.BovisKSinghSFieldsendJPinderCIdentification of masses in digital mammograms with MLP and RBF netsNeural Networks 2000, IJCNN 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference2000
- 17Bovis K, Singh S, editors. Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features. 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’00) 2000.BovisKSinghSDetection of masses in mammograms using texture features15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’00)2000
- 18Chen W, Giger M, Bick U, Newstead G. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys. 2006; 33:2878-87.1696486410.1118/1.2210568ChenWGigerMBickUNewsteadGAutomatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRIMed Phys200633287887