Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Observational study of omeprazole for gastroesophageal reflux on pulmonary function in adult asthmatics Cover

Observational study of omeprazole for gastroesophageal reflux on pulmonary function in adult asthmatics

Open Access
|Jan 2017

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Flow of the patients through the study
Flow of the patients through the study

Figure 2

Change in asthma control level after omeprazole treatment. Solid bars indicate partly controlled asthma after treatment, and open bars indicate controlled asthma after treatment.
Change in asthma control level after omeprazole treatment. Solid bars indicate partly controlled asthma after treatment, and open bars indicate controlled asthma after treatment.

Pulmonary function and ACT score after treatment 1 and 2 months

VariablesBaseline4th week8th week
FEV11.99 + 0 562.20 + 0 64

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

2.36 + 0 58

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

FVC2.84 + 0.743.05 + 0.81

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

3.13 + 0.82

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

PEF338.64 + 109.60365.0 + 103.0

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

399.47 + 101.79

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

ACT16.36 + 3.9720.82 + 3.30

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

23.00 + 1.69

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

Gender differences and the improvement of pulmonary function and ACT score after treatment

VariablesBaseline4th week8th week
FEV1 (L)
  Male2.20 + 0.482.46 + 0.50

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

2.55 + 0.49

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

  Female1.74 + 0.521.91 + 0.61

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

2.05 + 0.51

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

FVC (L)
  Male3.21 + 0.633.41 + 0.683.46 + 0.71

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

  Female2.43 + 0.562.68 + 0.70

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

2.75 + 0.60

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

PEF (L/min)
  Male378.33 + 79.07403.33 + 78.89

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

430.83 + 68.02

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

  Female295.83 + 114.85322.50 + 103.14

P < 0.05 vs. baseline

341.67 + 104.26

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

ACT score
  Male17.08 + 3.2921.67 + 1.92

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

23.42 + 1.31

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

  Female15.50 + 4.6620.08 + 4.03

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

22.83 + 1.85

P < 0.001 vs. baseline,

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicValue (%)
Number of patients24
Male sex, no (%)12 (50)
Age, years
 mean ± SD51.92 ± 10.71
 range31-70
Male age, year53.17 ± 10.95
Female age, year50.67 ± 10.78
Body mass index, kg/m222.07 ± 4.79
Symptomatic GERD, no (%)18 (75)
 regurgitation18 (100)
 heartburn15 (83)
 chest pain13 (72)
 chronic cough10 (55)
 hoarseness8 (44)
Asthma control status, no (%)
 partly controlled18 (75)
 uncontrolled6 (25)
Medication, no (%)
 SABA+ICS7 (29)
 SABA+LABA/ICS12 (50)
 SABA+LABA/ICS+theophylline4 (17)
 SABA+LABA/ICS+theophylline+antileukotriene1 (4)
Coexisting conditions, no (%)
 allergic rhinitis8 (33)
 hypertension6 (25)
 avascular necrosis1 (4)
 diabetes mellitus3 (12)
 benign prostate hypertrophy1 (4)
 dyslipidemia3 (13)
ACT score, no (%)
 20-248 (33)
 <2016 (67)
Smoking status0 (0)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0902.379 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 145
Published on: Jan 31, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Nattapong Jaimchariyatam, Phurin Haprasert, Sutep Gonchanvit, Somkiat Wongtim, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.