References
- 1. LaPier TK. Functional status during immediate recovery after hospitalization for coronary heart disease. J Cardiopulm Rehab. 2003; 23:203-7.
- 2. Jarrell LA, Hains, SJ, Kisilevsky BS, Brown CA. Gender differences in functional capacity following myocardial infarction: an exploratory study. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005; 15:28-33.
- 3. Dodson JA, Arnold SV, Reid KJ, Gill TM, Rich MW, Masoudi FA, et al. Physical function and independence 1 year after myocardial infarction: observations from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in recovery from acute Myocardial infarction: Patients’ Health status registry. Am Heart J. 2012; 163:790-6.
- 4. Balady GJ, Ades PA, Comoss P, Limacher M, Pina IL, Southard D, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs. Circulation. 2000; 102:1069-73.10.1161/01.CIR.102.9.1069
- 5. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capability (The Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64:651-4.10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7
- 6. Phillips L, Wang JW, Pfeffer B, Gianos E, Fisher D, Shaw LJ, et al. Clinical role of the Duke Activity Status Index in the selection of the optimal type of stress myocardial perfusion imaging study in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011; 18:1015-20.10.1007/s12350-011-9456-y
- 7. Brual J, Gravely S, Suskin N, Stewart DE, Grace SL. The role of clinical and geographic factors in the use of hospital versus home-based cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012; 35:220-6.
- 8. Mantziari L, Kamperidis V, Ventoulis I, Damvopoulou E, Giannakoulas G, Efthimiadis G, et al. Increased right atrial volume index predicts low Duke Activity Status Index in patients with chronic heart failure. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2013; 54: 32-38.
- 9. Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976; 54:522-3.
- 10. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey update. [online]. [cited 2013 January 19]. Available from: http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf36.shtml
- 11. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short- Form Health Survey 1: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30:473-83.10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
- 12. Sindhu S, Sriprasong S. A study of physical health conditions and level of activity during the recovering phase after discharge of acute myocardial infarction patients. The Thai Journal of Nursing Council. 2001; 16:52-68. [in Thai].
- 13. Hofer S, Benzer W, Alber H, Ruttmann E, Kopp M, Schussler G, et al. Determinates of health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients: a prospective study generating a structural equation model. Psychosomatics. 2005; 46:212-23.10.1176/appi.psy.46.3.212
- 14. Kaul P, Naylor CD, Armstrong PW, Mark DB, Theroux P, Dagenais GR. Assessment of activity status and survival according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification. Can J Cardiol. 2009; 25: e225-31.10.1016/S0828-282X(09)70506-9
- 15. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation. 1981; 64:1227-34.10.1161/01.CIR.64.6.1227
- 16. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof EL, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Circulation. 2007; 116:e418-500.
- 17. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005; 8:94-104.10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
- 18. Leurmarnkul W, Meetam P. Properties testing of the retranslated SF-36 (Thai version). Thai J Pharm Sci. 2005; 29:69-88.
- 19. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995; 4: 293-307.10.1007/BF01593882
- 20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
- 21. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications; 2003.
- 22. Alonso J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Cascant P, Brotons C, Prieto L, Soler-Soler J. Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients. Reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Eur Heart J. 1