Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Normative anatomy of the anal sphincter detected with 3D-endoanal ultrasonography Cover

Normative anatomy of the anal sphincter detected with 3D-endoanal ultrasonography

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. 1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg. 1994; 81:463-5.10.1002/bjs.1800810349
  2. 2. Christensen AF, Nyhuus B, Nielsen MB, Christensen H. Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex. Br J Radiol. 2005; 78:308-11.10.1259/bjr/72038963
  3. 3. Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85:865-75.10.1259/bjr/27314678
  4. 4. Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE. AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116:735-60.10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70195-2
  5. 5. Dobben AC, Terra MP, Slors JF, Deutekom M, Gerhards MF, Beets-Tan RG, et al. External anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: comparison of endoanal MR Imaging and Endoanal US. Radiology. 2007; 242:463-71.10.1148/radiol.2422051575
  6. 6. Saranovic D, Barisic G, Krivokapic Z, Masulovic D, Djuric-Stefanovic A. Endoanal ultrasound evaluation of anorectal diseases and disorders: technique, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 61:480-9.10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.033
  7. 7. Knowles AM, Knowles CH, Scott SM, Lunniss PJ. Effects of age and gender on three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography measurements: development of normal ranges. Tech Coloproctol. 2008; 12:323-9.10.1007/s10151-008-0443-5
  8. 8. Olsen IP, Augensen K, Wilsgaard T, Kiserud T. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters during rest and squeeze. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87:669-74.10.1080/00016340802088346
  9. 9. William AB, Cheetham MJ, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, et al. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 2000; 87:1674-9.10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01581.x
  10. 10. Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM, Lima DM, Silva FR, Barreto RG, Souza MH, et al. Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21:2207-11.10.1007/s00464-007-9339-0
  11. 11. Burnette SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorect Dis. 1991; 6:2-4.10.1007/BF00703951
  12. 12. Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Anal endosonography in asymptomatic subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993; 28:551-6.10.3109/00365529309098265
  13. 13. Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Simmons K, Corcoran A, Clark AL. External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194:1243-8.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.822
  14. 14. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cazemier M. Endosonography in anorectal disease: an overview. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006; 41(suppl 243):165-74.10.1080/00365520600664292
  15. 15. Rottenberg GT, William AB. Endoanal ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2002; 75:482-8.10.1259/bjr.75.893.750482
  16. 16. Schaffzin DM, Wong WD. Surgeon-performed ultrasound: endorectal ultrasound. Surg Clin N Am. 2004; 84:1127-49.10.1016/j.suc.2004.04.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0706.251 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 865 - 871
Published on: Feb 4, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Kasaya Tantiphlachiva, Chucheep Sahakitrungruang, Jirawat Pattanarun, Arun Rojanasakul, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.