Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Brief communication (Original). Multimodal imaging fiducial markers for kinematic measurement of joint models Cover

Brief communication (Original). Multimodal imaging fiducial markers for kinematic measurement of joint models

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. 1. Ammirati M, Gross JD, Ammirati G, Dugan S. Compariosn of registration accuracy of skin- and bone-implanted fiducials for frameless stereotaxis of the brain: a prospective study. Skul Base. 2002; 12: 125-30.10.1055/s-2002-33458-1165693817167664
  2. 2. Armsby HP. The principles of animal nutrition. J. Wiley and Sons, New York; 1908.
  3. 3. Barnden L, Kwiatek R, Lau Y, Hutton B, Thurfjell L, Pile K, et al. Validation of fully automatic brain SPET to MR co-registration. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000; 27: 147-54.10.1007/s00259005002010755719
  4. 4. Choi Y, Ahn SH, Lee HS, Hur WJ, Yoon JH, Kim TH, et al. Clinical usefulness of implanted fiducial markers for hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2011; 29:91-8.10.3857/jkstro.2011.29.2.91
  5. 5. Cloutier G, Soulez G, Quanadli SD, Allard L, Qin Z, Cloutier F, et al. A multimodality vascular imaging phatom with fiducial markers visible in DSA, CTA, MRI, and ultrasound. Med Phys. 2004; 31:1424-33.10.1118/1.173930015259645
  6. 6. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, and Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 410:114-30.10.1097/01.blo.0000062385.79828.7212771822
  7. 7. Gendrin C, Markelj P, Pawiro SA, Spoerk J, Bloch C, Weber C, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: The comparison of intensity- and gradient-based merit functions using a new gold standard data set. Med Phys. 2011; 38:1491-502.10.1118/1.3553403308976721520861
  8. 8. Grayeli AB, Esquia-Medina G, Nguyen Y, Mazalaigue S, Vellin J-F, Lombard B, et al. Use of anatomical or invasive markers in association with skin surface registration in image-guided surgery of the temporal bone. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2009; 129:405-10.10.1080/0001648080257902519153848
  9. 9. Hendee WR, and Morgan CJ. Magnetic resonance imaging. Part I-physical principles. West J Med. 1984; 141:491-500.
  10. 10. Ho JU, Chen MF, Chen WC. The feasibility study of customized fiducial markers in image fusion and position markers for radiation therapy. Proceedings of Korean Radio Therapiest Association Conference. 2008; 43:99-100.
  11. 11. King DM, Fagan AJ, Moran CM, Browne JE. Comparative imaging study in ultrasound, MRI, CT, and DSA using a multimodality renal artery phantom. Med Phys. 2011; 38:565-73.10.1118/1.353367421452693
  12. 12. Kolind SH, Mackay AL, Munk PL, Xiang QS. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20:487-95.10.1002/jmri.2014415332257
  13. 13. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 410:69-81.10.1097/01.blo.0000062384.79828.3b12771818
  14. 14. Lee YS, Seon JK, Shin VI, Kim GH, Jeon M. Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model. Biomed Eng Online. 2008; 7:6.10.1186/1475-925X-7-6
  15. 15. Li G, Defrate LE, Rubash HE, Gill TJ. In vivo kinematics of the ACL during weight-bearing knee flexion. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23:340-4.10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.006
  16. 16. Li G, Wuerz TH, Defrate LE. Feasibility of using orthogonal fluoroscopic images to measure in vivo joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126:314-8.10.1115/1.1691448
  17. 17. Parker CC, Damyanovich A, Haycocks T, Haider M, Bayley A, Catton CN. Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tommography co-registration. Radiother Oncol. 2003; 66:217-24.10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00407-3
  18. 18. Pawiro SA, Markelj P, Pernus F, Gendrin C, Figl M, Weber C, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: A new gold standard data set. Med Phys. 2011; 38: 1481-90.10.1118/1.3553402309101721520860
  19. 19. Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N. Application of a CT-3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system to the pelvic and femoral regions. Comput Aided Surg. 2012; 17:69-76.10.3109/10929088.2012.65482322348659
  20. 20. Vikhoff-Baaz B, Bergh AC, Starck G, Ekholm S, Wikkelso C. A new set of fiducial markers for MRI, CT and SPET alignment. Nucl Med Commun. 1997; 18:1148-54.10.1097/00006231-199712000-000069481761
  21. 21. West JJ, Patel AR, Kramer CM, Helms AS, Olson ES, Rangavajhala V, et al. Dynamic registration of preablation imaging with a catheter geometry to guide ablation in a Swine model: validation of image integration and assessment of catheter navigation accuracy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21:81-7.10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01572.x19682169
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0704.205 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 509 - 516
Published on: Feb 4, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Jae Won You, Yeon Soo Lee, Hong Moon Sohn, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.