Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in acute pancreatitis Cover

Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in acute pancreatitis

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. 1. Steinberg W, Tenner S. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:1198-210.10.1056/NEJM199404283301706
  2. 2. Casas JD, Diaz R, Valderas G, Mariscal A, Cuadras P. Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182:569-74.10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820569
  3. 3. Piironen A. Severe acute pancreatitis: contrastenhanced CT and MRI features. Abdom Imaging. 2001; 26:225-33.10.1007/s002610000153
  4. 4. Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg. 1990; 77:1260-4.10.1002/bjs.1800771120
  5. 5. Corfield AP, Cooper MJ, Williamson RC, Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Dickson AP, et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985; 2:403-7.10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92733-3
  6. 6. Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, Megibow AJ, Caccavale R, Cooper MM. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology. 1985; 156:767-72.10.1148/radiology.156.3.4023241
  7. 7. Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and localising pancreatic necrosis. BMJ. 1990; 300:1425-8.10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1425
  8. 8. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990; 174:331-6.10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296641
  9. 9. Simchuk EJ, Traverso LW, Nukui Y, Kozarek RA. Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 2000; 179:352-5.10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00375-5
  10. 10. Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, Chen HC, Wang HJ, Shen LK, et al. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:6049-52.10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049
  11. 11. De Sanctis JT, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, Halpern EF, Saini S, et al. Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs APACHE II. Clin Radiol. 1997; 52:842-8.10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80079-7
  12. 12. van den Biezenbos AR, Kruyt PM, Bosscha K, van Leeuwen MS, Feldberg MA, van der Schouw YT, et al. Added value of CT criteria compared to the clinical SAP score in patients with acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging. 1998; 23:622-6.10.1007/s002619900417
  13. 13. Hwang TL, Chang KY, Ho YP. Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography does not aggravate the clinical severity of patients with severe acute pancreatitis: reevaluation of the effect of intravenous contrast medium on the severity of acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000; 135:287-90.10.1001/archsurg.135.3.287
  14. 14. Wang YX, Chen S, Morcos SK. Contrast-enhanced CT in acute pancreatitis. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72:1029.10.1259/bjr.72.862.10673959
  15. 15. Bradley EL, 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993; 128:586-90. 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170122019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0703.187 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 357 - 364
Published on: Feb 4, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Ketsuda Jakchairoongruang, Kiat Arjhansiri, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.