Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Patient dose and image quality from the low kilovoltage dynamic liver computed tomography examinations Cover

Patient dose and image quality from the low kilovoltage dynamic liver computed tomography examinations

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. 1. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology. 1990; 176:181-3.10.1148/radiology.176.1.23530882353088
  2. 2. Kalender WA, Polacin A. Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys. 1991; 18:910-5.10.1118/1.5966071961153
  3. 3. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Mayo JR, Muller NL. Acquisition, injection, and reconstruction techniques. In: CT angiography of the chest. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
  4. 4. Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT:once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology.1998; 209:327-9.10.1148/radiology.209.2.98075559807555
  5. 5. Choi JH, Cha SH, Lee KY, Shin DC, Kang JH, Kim YH, et al. The development of a guidance level for patient dose for CT examinations in Korea. Radiation Protection. Dosimetry. 2009; 138:137-43.10.1093/rpd/ncp23619864327
  6. 6. Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, KelseyCA. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot. 2000; 20:353-9.10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/30111140709
  7. 7. Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K. Survey of CT practice in the UK. II. Dosimetric aspects. 1991; NRPB report no. R-249. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board 1991.
  8. 8. Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S. CT scanner Dosimetry Br J Radiol. 1998; 71:1-3.
  9. 9. Anthony SJ, Barnes GT, Gould RG. Specification, acceptance testing and quality control of diagnostic x-ray imaging equipment Medical physics monograph No. 20. 1991: 899-936.
  10. 10. Gray JE. Radiological protection issue in mammography and computed tomography proc. conf. (Vienna : IAEA) 2001; 183-200.
  11. 11. Mini RL, Vock P, Mury R, Schneeberger P. Radiation exposure of patients who undergo CT of the trunk. Radiology. 1995; 195:557-62.10.1148/radiology.195.2.77247837724783
  12. 12. Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Mukundan S Jr, Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Miller CM, et al. Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection-phantom study. Radiology. 2008; 246:125-32.10.1148/radiol.246107030718096533
  13. 13. Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakaura T, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, Date S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients weighing 70 kg or less: initial trial of compact-bolus dynamic CT with low-dose contrast material at 80 kVp. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 1324-31.10.2214/AJR.10.454521606296
  14. 14. Funama Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, Nagasue N, Shimamura M, et al. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study. Radiology. 2005; 237:905-10.10.1148/radiol.237304164316237139
  15. 15. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology. 2005; 237:945-51.10.1148/radiol.237304165516237140
  16. 16. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005; 366: 1197-209.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1
  17. 17. The Health and Welfare Enforcement Ordinance 349. The Regulations on Safety Management of Radiation Generating Equipment for Diagnosis. (Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare) Radiation Safety Series No. 13. 2007.
  18. 18. The Health and Welfare Enforcement Ordinance 386. The Regulations on Installation, Operation and Quality Management of Special Medical Equipment of the Special. (Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare) Radiation Safety Series No. 13. 2007.
  19. 19. Ckanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys. 2002; 29:1643-50.10.1118/1.149321312201409
  20. 20. Cardinal HN, Holdsworth DW, Drangova M, Hobbs BB, Fenster A. Experimental and theoretical X-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents. Med Phys.1993; 226: 15-31.10.1118/1.5971348455493
  21. 21. Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH. Multidetector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology. 2003; 226:762-72.10.1148/radiol.226302020512616020
  22. 22. Kalva SP, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Saini S. Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30: 391-7.10.1097/00004728-200605000-0000816778612
  23. 23. Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD, Wilson CR, Quiroz FA, Taylor AJ. Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner. AJR. 2000; 175: 679-85.10.2214/ajr.175.3.175067910954450
  24. 24. Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, Nishibori H, Kato H, Yokoyama R, et al. Oprimizing scan delays of fixed duration contrast injection in contrast-enhanced biphasic multidetector-row CT for the liver and the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. J omput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29:195-201.10.1097/01.rct.0000155062.50236.5915772536
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0701.158 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 119 - 124
Published on: Feb 4, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Pyong-Kon Cho, Sung-Hyun Lee, Mi-Hwa Lee, Young-Kwon Cho, Kwon-Soo Chon, Yong-Min Kim, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.