Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Anatomic variants of intrahepatic bile ducts in Thais Cover

Anatomic variants of intrahepatic bile ducts in Thais

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. 1. Crawford JM. Development of the intrahepatic biliary tree. Semin Liver Dis. 2002; 22:213-6.10.1055/s-2002-3450812360416
  2. 2. Vijayan V, Tan CE. Development of the human intrahepatic biliary system. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999; 28:105-8.
  3. 3. Moore K, Persuad TVN. The developing human: Clinically oriented embryology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Suanders; 1998. p. 277-80.
  4. 4. Sadler TW. Langman’s medical embryology. 7th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 252-6.
  5. 5. Koga A, Yamada E. Morphogenesis of intrahepatic bile ducts of the human fetus. Anat Entwickl-Gesch. 1971; 135:156-84.10.1007/BF005211085135745
  6. 6. Desmet VJ. Pathogenesis of ductal plate malformation. J Gastroen Hepatol. 2004; 19:S356-60.10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03702.x
  7. 7. Koenraad J, Pablo R. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR. 2001; 177:390-4.
  8. 8. Gazelle GS, Lee MJ, Mueller PR. Cholangiographic segmental anatomy of the liver. RadioGraphics. 1994; 14:1005-13.10.1148/radiographics.14.5.79918107991810
  9. 9. Wise PE, Holzman MD. Surgical anatomy of the gallbladder, liver, and biliary tree. In: Bruce V, Macfadyen JR, editors. Laparoscopic surgery of the abdomen. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 73 - 86.10.1007/0-387-21780-0_11
  10. 10. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. MR cholangio-pancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics. 2000; 20:939-57.10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl2393910903685
  11. 11. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1996; 199: 521-7.10.1148/radiology.199.2.86688058668805
  12. 12. Murat K, Mehmet SU, Nail B, Ibrahim S. MR cholangiopancreatography of a case with a biliary tract variation and postoperative biliary duct injury. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005; 11:219-21.
  13. 13. Reinbold C, Bert PM, Guibaud L. MR cholangiopancreatography: potential clinical applications. Radiographics. 1996; 16:309-20.10.1148/radiographics.16.2.89662898966289
  14. 14. Bearcroft PW, Lomas DJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreato-graphy. Gut. 1997; 41:135-7.10.1136/gut.41.2.13518914649301488
  15. 15. L Van Hoe. Atlas of cross-sectional and projective MR cholangiopancreatography. Berlin: Springer; 2001.10.1007/978-3-642-59808-1
  16. 16. Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg. 1983; 7:271-6.10.1007/BF016561596868640
  17. 17. Cheng YF, Huang TL, Chen CL, Sheen-Chen SM, Lui CC, Chen TY, et al. Anatomic dissociation between the intrahepatic bile duct and portal vein: risk factors for left hepatectomy. World J Surg. 1997; 21:297-300.10.1007/s0026899002329015174
  18. 18. Kim HJ, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Kim YT, Lee DK, et al. Normal structure, variations and anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary ducts of Koreans: a nationwide cooperative prospective study. Gastrointest Endos. 2002; 55:889-96.10.1067/mge.2002.12463512024146
  19. 19. Choi JW, Kim TK, Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim PN, Ha HK, et al. Anatomic variation in intrahepatic bile ducts: an analysis of intraoperative cholangiograms in 300 consecutive donors for living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Radiol. 2003; 4:85-90.10.3348/kjr.2003.4.2.85269807512845303
  20. 20. Kitagawa Y, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K, et al. Intrahepatic segmental bile duct patterns in hepatolithiasis: a comparative cholangiographic study between Taiwan and Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003; 10:377-81.10.1007/s00534-002-0834-314598139
  21. 21. Ayuso JR, Ayuso C, Bombuy E, De Juan C, Llovet JM, De Caralt TM, et al. Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in adult live liver donors with volumetric mangafodipir trisodium enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10:1391-7.10.1002/lt.2028115497156
  22. 22. Lee VS, Krinsky GA, Nazzaro CA, Chang JS, Babb JS, Lin JC, et al. Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2 weighted MR cholangiography. Radiology. 2004; 233:659-66.10.1148/radiol.233303197715516606
  23. 23. Macdonald DB, Haider MA, Khalili K, Kim TK, O’Malley M, Greig PD, et al. Relationship between vascular and biliary anatomy in living liver donors. AJR. 2005; 185:247-52.10.2214/ajr.185.1.0185024715972431
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0506.126 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 57
Published on: Feb 4, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Puntira Thungsuppawattanakit, Kiat Arjhansiri, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.