Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Type I collagen extracted from rat-tail and bovine Achilles tendon for dental application: a comparative study Cover

Type I collagen extracted from rat-tail and bovine Achilles tendon for dental application: a comparative study

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. 1. Dallon JC, Ehrlich HP. A review of fibroblast collagen lattices. Wound Repair Regen. 2008; 16:472-9.10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00392.x
  2. 2. Friess W. Collagen-biomaterial for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998; 45:113-36.10.1016/S0939-6411(98)00017-4
  3. 3. Lynn IVY, Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2004; 71B: 343-54.10.1002/jbm.b.30096
  4. 4. O’Leary R, Wood E. A novel in vitro dermal woundhealing model incorporating a response to mechanical wounding and repopulation of a fibrin provisional matrix. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology- Animal. 2003; 39:204-7.10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<;0204:ANIVDW>2.0.CO;2
  5. 5. Hsu FY, Chueh SC, Wang YJ. Microspheres of hydroxyapatite/reconstituted collagen as supports for osteoblast cell growth. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:1931-6.10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00095-2
  6. 6. Huang Y-C, Wang T-W, Sun J-S, Lin F-H. Epidermal morphogenesis in an in-vitro model using a fibroblastsembedded collagen scaffold. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2005; 12:855-67.10.1007/s11373-005-9018-x
  7. 7. Angele P, Abke J, Kujat R, Faltermeier H, Schumann D, Nerlich M, et al. Influence of different collagen species on physico-chemical properties of crosslinked collagen matrices. Biomaterials. 2004; 25:2831-41.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.066
  8. 8. Shanmugasundaram N, Ravikumar T, Babu M. Comparative physico-chemical and in vitro properties of fibrillated collagen scaffolds from different sources. J Biomater Appl. 2004; 18:247-6410.1177/0885328204040945
  9. 9. Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979; 76:1274-8.10.1073/pnas.76.3.1274
  10. 10. Zeugolis DI, Paul RG, Attenburrow G. Factors influencing the properties of reconstituted collagen fibers prior to self-assembly: animal species and collagen extraction method. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 86:892-904.10.1002/jbm.a.31694
  11. 11. Pieper JS, Oosterhof A, Dijkstra PJ, Veerkamp JH, van Kuppevelt TH. Preparation and characterization of porous crosslinked collagenous matrices containing bioavailable chondroitin sulphate. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:847-58.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00240-3
  12. 12. Rajan N, Habermehl J, Cote M-F, Doillon CJ, Mantovani D. Prep aration o f read y-to -use, storab le and reconstituted type I collagen from rat-tail tendon for tissue engineering applications. Nat Protocols. 2007; 1:2753-58.10.1038/nprot.2006.430
  13. 13. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227:680-5.10.1038/227680a0
  14. 14. Piboonniyom SO, Timmermann S, Hinds P, Munger K. Aberrations in the MTS1 tumor suppressor locus in oral squamous cell carcinoma lines preferentially affect the INK4A gene and result in increased cdk6 activity. Oral Oncol. 2002; 38:179-86.10.1016/S1368-8375(01)00042-2
  15. 15. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983; 65: 55-63.10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
  16. 16. Lin YK, Liu DC. Comparison of physical-chemical properties of type I collagen from different species. Food Chemistry. 2006; 99:244-51.10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.053
  17. 17. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 1077-86.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00630-6
  18. 18. Berthod F, Saintigny G, Chretien F, Hayek D, Collombel C, Damour O. Optimization of thickness, pore size and mechanical properties of a biomaterial designed for deep burn coverage. Clin Mater. 1994; 15:259-65.10.1016/0267-6605(94)90055-8
  19. 19. Lee JE, Park JC, Hwang YS, Kim JK, Kim JG, Sub H. Characterization of UV-irradiated dense/porous co llag en me mb ran es: mo rpho log y, enzy mat ic degradation, and mechanical properties. Yonsei Med J. 2001; 42:172-9.10.3349/ymj.2001.42.2.172
  20. 20. Faraj KA, van Kuppevelt TH, Daamen WF. Construction of collagen scaffolds that mimic the three-dimensional architecture of specific tissues. Tissue Eng. 2007; 13:2387-9410.1089/ten.2006.0320
  21. 21. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005; 26:433-41.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052
  22. 22. Rhee S, Grinnell F. Fibroblast mechanics in 3D collagen matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007; 59:1299-305.10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.006
  23. 23. Eckes B, Zigrino P, Kessler D, Holtkotter O, Shephard P, Mauch C, et al. Fibroblast-matrix interactions in wound healing and fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2000; 19: 325-32. 10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00077-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0506.111 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 787 - 798
Published on: Feb 4, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Suteera Techatanawat, Rudee Surarit, Theeralaksna Suddhasthira, Siribang-on Piboonniyom Khovidhunkit, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.