References
- 1 Abrahams D, Regulations for Corporations: A Historical Account of TNC Regulation (UNRISD 2005).
- 2 Altholz R, ‘Chronicle of a Death Foretold: The Future of U.S. Human Rights Litigation Post-Kiobel’ (2013) UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2347213
- 3 Amao O, Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and the Law: Multinational corporations in developing countries, (Routledge 2009)
- 4 Anderson K, ‘Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum: The Alien Tort Statute’s Jurisdictional Universalism in Retreat’ [2013] Cato Supreme Court Review, 149
- 5 Baluarte DC, ‘Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain: Upholding the Alien Tort Claims Act While Affirming American Exceptionalism’ Human Rights Brief 12, no. 1 (2004)
- 6 Bechky PS, ‘Homage to Filártiga’ (2013) Review of Litigation (forthcoming) <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2336305>
- 7 Born GP, International Civil Litigation in United States Courts (5th edn, Aspen Pub 2011) 682
- 8 Calabresi SG, ‘“A Shining City on a Hill”: American Exceptionalism and the Supreme Court’s Practice of Relying on Foreign Law’ [2006] 86 Boston University Law Review 1335
- 9 Clapham A, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (OUP 2006)
- 10 Clopton ZD, ‘Replacing the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality’ (2013) Boston University Law
- 11 Chander A ‘Unshackling Foreign Corporations: Kiobel’s Unexpected Legacy.’ (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law, Forthcoming ; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 342. <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2297048> accessed 31 December 2013
- 12 Chomsky J, ‘Will the Real ATS Please Stand up’ [2010] 33 Suffolk Transnational Law Review 33(3) 461
- 13 Chronowski N, ‘International and Constitutional Approach of Business and Human Rights’, (2013) forthcoming <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2294129>
- 14 Colangelo AJ, ‘A Unified Approach to Extraterritoriality’ [2011] 97 Virginia Law Review 5 1019
- 15 Colangelo AJ, ‘Kiobel: Muddling the Distinction Between Prescriptive and Adjudicative Jurisdiction’ (2013) Maryland Journal of International Law forthcoming <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2246138>
- 16 Colangelo AJ, ‘The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations in Kiobel and Beyond’ [2013] 44 Georgetown Journal of International Law 1329
- 17 Deva S, Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business (Routledge 2012)
- 18 Donovan D and Roberts A, ‘The Emerging Recognition of Universal Civil Jurisdiction’ [2006] The American Journal of International Law 100 American Journal of International Law 142, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3518834
- 19 Giannini T and Farbstein S, ‘Corporate Accountability in Conflict Zones: How Kiobel Undermines the Nuremberg Legacy and Modern Human Rights.’ Harvard International Law Journal 52 (2010): 119
- 20 Glendon MA, A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Random House 2001)
- 21 Goel R, Guide to Instruments of Corporate Responsibility: An Overview of 16 Key Tools for Labour Fund Trustees (York University, 2005)
- 22 Gomez V, ‘The Sosa Standard: What Does It Mean for Future ATS Litigation?’ (2006) Pepperdine Law Review 33:2 469
- 23 Hafetz J, ‘Human Rights Litigation and the National Interest: Kiobel’s Application of the Presumption Against Extra-Territoriality to the Alien Tort Statute’ (2013) 28 Maryland Journal of International Law 107
- 24 Hoffmann S, ‘American Exceptionalism: The New Vision’ in Michael Ignatieff (ed), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (PUP 2006) 267
- 25 Hufbauer G and Mitrokostas N Awakening Monster: The Alien Tort Statute of 1789 (Peterson Institute 2003)
- 26 Ignatieff M, ‘Introduction: American Exceptionalism and Human Rights’ in Michael Ignatieff (ed), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (PUP 2006)
- 27 Jägers N, Corporate Human Rights Obligations: In Search of Accountability (Intersentia 2002)
- 28 Jolly R and Emmerij L and Weiss TG, UN Ideas That Changed the World, (Indiana University Press 2009) 112
- 29 Kita MH, ‘It’s Not You, It’s Me: An Analysis of the United States’ Failure to Uphold its Commitment to OECD Guidelines for Multination Enterprises in Spite of No Other Reliable Alternatives’ (2010) 29: 2 Penn State International Law Review 359
- 30 Knowles R, ‘A Realist Defense of the Alien Tort Statute’ [2011] 88:1117 Washington University Law Review 1168
- 31 Koebele M, Corporate Responsibility under the Alien Tort Statute. (MNP 2009)
- 32 Koh HH, ‘On American Exceptionalism’ [2003] Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1778
- 33 Koh HH, ‘America’s Jekyll and Hyde Exceptionalism’ in Michael Ignatieff (ed), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (PUP 2006)
- 34 Ku J, ‘Online Kiobel symposium: The Alien Tort Statute as a species of extraterritorial U.S. law’ (SCOTUSblog, 16 July 2012)
- 35 Macleod S and Lewis D, ‘Transnational Corporations: Power, Influence and Responsibility’ [2004] 4(1) Global Social Policy 77
- 36 Moravcsik A, ‘The Paradox of U.S. Human Rights Policy’ in Michael Ignatieff (ed), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (PUP 2006)
- 37 Moravcsik A, ‘The Myth of Unipolarity in a Post-Cold War World: Lessons about Power from the U.S. and Europe’ (2007) China and Global Institutions Project, Princeton University
- 38 Muchlinski P, Multinational Enterprises and the Law (2nd edn, OUP 2007) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199227969.book.1
- 39 Murray J, ‘A New Phase in the Regulation of Multinational Enterprises: The Role of the OECD’ [2001] 30(3) Industrial Law Journal 256
- 40 Parrish A, ‘Reclaiming International Law from Extraterritoriality’ [2009] 93 Minnesota Law Review 815
- 41 Parrish A ‘Kiobel, Unilateralism, and the Retreat from Extraterritoriality’ [2013] 28 Maryland Journal of International Law 103
- 42 Ramsey MD, ‘International Law Limits on Investor Liability in Human Rights Litigation’ [2009] 50 Harvard International Law Journal 271, 271-272
- 43 Ratner S, ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility’ [2001] 111 Yale Law Journal 443
- 44 Reinisch A, ‘The Changing International Framework for Dealing with Non-State Actors’ in Philip Alston (ed), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (OUP 2005)
- 45 Ruggie J, ‘American Exceptionalism, Exemptionalism, and Global Governance’ (2004) KSG Working Paper No RWP04-006 372
- 46 Ruggie J, ‘American Exceptionalism, Exemptionalism, and Global Governance’ in Michael Ignatieff (ed), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (PUP 2006) 389
- 47 Ruggie J, ‘Doctrinal Unilateralism and its Limits: America and Global Governance in the New Century.’ (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No.16
- 48 Ruggie J, Just Business, (W.W. Norton & Company 2013)
- 49 Schlesinger SC, Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations (Westview Press 2003)
- 50 Sloss DL, ‘Kiobel and Extraterritoriality: A Rule Without a Rationale’ (2013) Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No.11-13
- 51 Stephens B, ‘Extraterritoriality and Human Rights After Kiobel.’ [2013] 28: 1 Maryland Journal of International Law 256
- 52 Truitt JF, ‘Expropriation of Foreign Investment: Summary of the Post World War II Experience of American and British Investors in Less Developed Countries’ [1970] I Journal of International Business Studies 21
- 53 Wechsler L, ‘Exceptional Cases in Rome: The United States and the Struggle for an ICC,’ in Sarah B. Sewall and Carl Kaysen (eds) The United States and the International Criminal Court: National Security and International Law (Rowman & Littlefield, 2000)
- 54 Williams O, ‘The UN Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise’ [2004] 14 (4) Business Ethics Quarterly 755