International Obligations, State Responsibility and Judicial Review Under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Regime
By: Scott Robinson
References
- Backer L C, Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID) v Das Air and Global Witness v Afrimex: Small Steps Toward an Autonomous Transnational Legal System for the Regulation of Multinational Corporations (2009) 10 Melbourne J Int’l L 258
- Brandon M, Analysis of the Terms ‘Treaty’ and ‘International Agreement’ for the Purposes of Registration Under Article 102 of the United Nations Charter (1953) 47 Am J Int’l L 49
- Cernic J L, Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights: A Critical Analysis of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2008) 3 Hanse LR 1
- Cernic J L, Global Witness V. Afrimex LTD.: Decision Applying OECD Guidelines on Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights (2009) 13 ASIL Insight 1
- De Wet E, Holding International Institutions Accountable: The Complementary Role of Non-Judicial Oversight Mechanisms and Judicial Review (2008) 9 German LJ 1987, 1994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.v30i78.68 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 81
Published on: Feb 28, 2014
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2014 Scott Robinson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.