Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Post-EU Accession to the ECHR: The Argument for Why the ECtHR Should Abandon the Bosphorus Doctrine Cover

Post-EU Accession to the ECHR: The Argument for Why the ECtHR Should Abandon the Bosphorus Doctrine

Open Access
|May 2024

Abstract

This article analyses the case law of the ECtHR on the responsibility of the Contracting Parties following from their membership in the EU and the Court’s application of the Bosphorus presumption of equivalent protection over the period 2005–2021. It critically evaluates this presumption and the broader consequences it generates in European human rights law. The article then explores the future of the presumption in light of the case law developments and the recently relaunched negotiations on the EU’s accession to the ECHR. The summary analysis over a sixteen-year period of the Strasbourg case law demonstrates that there is a lack of methodological clarity when it comes to the parameters and the application of the Bosphorus presumption. It also shows that the mere existence of the presumption was brought into question in the case law relating to the EU principle of mutual trust. This conclusion, coupled with the recently revived aspirations for a speedy accession, suggests that the time has come for the ECtHR to abandon the Bosphorus doctrine.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.639 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2024
Accepted on: May 13, 2024
Published on: May 29, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Šejla Imamović, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.