How to Deal with Really Good Bad-Faith Interpreters: M.A. v Denmark
References
- Arnardóttir OM, ‘Organised Retreat? The Move from “Substantive” to “Procedural” Review in the ECtHR’s Case Law on the Margin of Appreciation’ (European Society of International Law Annual Conference Oslo, September 2015) 1. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2709669
- Brems E and Lavrysen L, ‘Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 35 Human Rights Quarterly 176. DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2013.0000
- Çalı B, ‘Coping With Crisis: Whither the Variable Geometry in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2018) 32 Wisconsin International Law Journal 237.
- Dothan S, ‘Why Granting States a Margin of Appreciation Supports the Formation of a Genuine European Consensus’ (2015) 22 iCourts Working Paper Series 1. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2597949
- Gammeltoft-Hansen T, ‘Refugee policy as “negative nation branding”: the case of Denmark and the Nordics’ (2017) Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 99. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3902589
- Gerards J,
‘Procedural review by the ECtHR: A Typology’ in Gerards J and Brems E (eds), Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases (Cambridge University Press 2018) 127. DOI: 10.1017/9781316874844
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.563 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 65
Submitted on: Aug 5, 2021
Accepted on: Nov 3, 2021
Published on: Jul 4, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2022 Helga Molbæk-Steensig, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.