References
- Akehurst M, ‘Equity and General Principles of Laws’ (1976) 25 Int Comp Law 801. DOI: 10.1093/iclqaj/25.4.801
- Alonso F H L, ‘Cicero and Natural Law’ (2012) 98 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 157.
- Alexy R, Julian Rivers (tr), A Theory of Constitutional Rights (OUP 2002).
- Andenas M and Zleptnig S, ‘Proportionality: WTO Law: In Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 42 Tex Int’l LJ 371.
- Aristoteles, Ross W D (tr), Nicomachean Ethics (OUP 2009).
- Bassiouni C M, ‘A Functional Approach To General Principles of International Law’ 11 Mich J Int’l L 768.
- Barak A ‘Proportionality and Principled Balancing’ (2010) 4 L & Ethics Hum Rts 1. DOI: 10.2202/1938-2545.1041
- Barnes J,
‘Roman Aristotle’ in Jonathan Barnes, Miriam T. Griffin (eds.) Philosophia Togata II (OUP 1997). - Benvenisti E,
‘The Role of Equity in Int Law: the Appointment of Shared Water Resources’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebre University 1997). - Biscardi A,
‘On Aequitas and Epieikeia’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebre University 1997). - Blum Y Z,
‘The Role of Equity in International Law’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebre University 1997). - Bothe M, Ronzitti N and Rosas A (eds.), The New Chemical Weapons Convention – Implementation and Prospects (Kluwer 1998).
- Cicero M T, Griffin M T, and Atkins E M (tr), On Duties (New York: CUP, 1991).
- Cicero M T, Zetzel J (tr), On the Commonwealth and On the Laws (CUP, 1999). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803635
- Collins
Jr. E and Rogoff M A, ‘The Gulf of Maine Case and the Future of Ocean Boundary Delimitation’ (1986) 38 Me L Rev 1. - Cottier T et al, ‘The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations’ (2017) 18 JWIT 628. DOI: 10.1163/22119000-12340054
- de Visscher C, De l’Équité Dans Le règlement Arbitral ou Judiciaire Des Litiges de Droit International Public (Pedone, 1972).
- Dworkin R, ‘Social Rules and Legal Theory’ (1972) 81 Yale LJ 855. DOI: 10.2307/795153
- Eissen M A,
‘The Principle of Proportionality in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Ronald Macdonald, Franz Matscher and Herbert Petzold eds., The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Springer 1993). - Engle E, ‘The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview’ (2012) 10 Dartmouth LJ 1.
- Evans M, ‘Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway)’ 43 (1994) ICLQ 697. DOI: 10.1093/iclqaj/43.3.697
- Fedele D,
‘Ius gentium: The Metamorphoses of a Legal Concept (Ancient Rome to Early Modern Europe)’ in Edward Canavagh (ed) Empire and Legal Thought. Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity (Brill/Nijhoff 2020), 213–251. DOI: 10.1163/9789004431249_009 - Fitzgerald A, Peace and War in Antiquity (Scholartis 1931).
- Fitzmaurice G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice’ (1953) 30 British Ybk Intl L 1.
- Franck R, ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’ (2008) 102 Am. J. Int’l L 715. DOI: 10.2307/20456680
- French D, ‘From Seoul with Love’ — The Continuing Relevance of the 1986 Seoul ILA Declaration on Progressive Development of Principles of Public International Law Relating to a New International Economic Order’ (2008) 55 NILR 3. DOI: 10.1017/S0165070X0800003X
- Gardam J G, ‘The Proportionality and Force in International Law’ (1998) 87 Am. J. Int’l L 391. DOI: 10.2307/2203645
- Giltaij J
‘Greek Philosophy and Classical Roman Law’ in Paul J. du Plessis, Clifford Ando, Kaius Tuori (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society (OUP 2016). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.15 - Greig W D, ‘Reciprocity, Proportionality, and the Law of Treaties’ (1994) 34 Va J Int’l L 295.
- Grotius H, Richard T (ed)
The Rights of War and Peace , (Liberty 2005). - Grunert F and Kapossy B, ‘Christian Wolff’s Lectures on Grotius’s De Iure Belli ac Pacis from 1739–1740’ (2017) 38 Grotiana 229. DOI: 10.1163/18760759-03800011
- Hallebeek J, ‘Some Remarks on Laesio Enormis and Proportionality in Roman-Dutch Law and Calvinistic Commercial Ethics’ (2015) 21 Fundamina 14. DOI: 10.17159/2411-7870/2015/v21n1a2
- Henkin L, ‘Kosovo and the Law of Humanitarian Intervention’ (1999) 93 Am. J. Int’l L 824. DOI: 10.2307/2555346
- Herman L L ‘The Court Giveth and the Court Taketh Away: An Analysis of the Tunisia-Libya Continental Shelf Case’ 33 (1984) ICLQ 825. DOI: 10.1093/iclqaj/33.4.825
- Higgins R, International Law and How We Use It (OUP, 1994). DOI: 10.1093/law/9780198764106.001.0001
- Hofmeister H H, ‘Neither the Caroline Formula Nor the Bush Doctrine-An Alternative Framework to Assess the Legality of Preemptive Strikes’ (2005) 2 UNELJ 31.
- Hulsroj P,
The Principle of Proportionality (Springer 2013). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5775-2 - Hurka T, ‘Proportionality in the Morality of War’ (2005) 33 Philosophy & Public Affairs 34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00024.x
- Kahn P W, ‘The Court, The Community and the Judicial Balance: the Jurisprudence of Justice Powell’ (1987) 97 Yale L J 1. DOI: 10.2307/796427
- Kolb R, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law (with Special Reference to Good Faith)’ (2006) 53 Neth Int Law Rev 1. DOI: 10.1017/S0165070X06000015
- Klatt M and Meister M, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (OUP, 2012). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001
- Lapidoth R,
‘Equity in International Adjudication’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebrew University 1997). - Lauterpacht H, Private Law Analogies and Sources of International Law (London 1927).
- Legg A, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (OUP 2012). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199650453.001.0001
- Lubell N and Cohen A, ‘Strategic Proportionality: Limitations on the Use of Force in Modern Armed Conflicts’ (2020) 96 Int’l L. Stud. 159–195.
- Martin A M, ‘Proportionality: An Addition to the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Dispute’s Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2014) 37(3) BC Intl & Comp L Rev 58.
- Mattei U,
‘Efficiency as Equity’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebrew University 1997). - Moussa J, ‘Can Jus ad Bellum Override Jus in Bello? Reaffirming the Separation of the Two Bodies of Law’ (2008) 90 Int’l Rev Red Cross 965. DOI: 10.1017/S181638310900023X
- Newton M and May L, Proportionality in International Law (OUP 2014).
- Nijman J E, ‘Ius Gentium et Naturale: The Human Conscience and Early Modern International Law’ Amsterdam Center for International Law, No. 2020-32.
- Norr D, Fides in Römischen Völkerrecht (Heidelberg, 1991).
- Nussbaum A, ‘Just War-A Legal Concept’ (1943) 42 Mich. L. Rev 453. DOI: 10.2307/1283519
- Okimoto K, ‘The Cumulative Requirements of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in the Context of Self-Defense’ (2012) Chin. J. Int. Law 45. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmr049
- Peters A, ‘Proportionality as a Global Constitutional Principle’ MPIL Research Paper Series No 2016–10 (2016). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2773733
- Pirker B, Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review (Europa, 2013).
- Polanyi K,
‘Aristotle Discovers the Economy’ in Karl Polanyi, Conrad Arensberg, Harry Pearson (ed) Trade and Market in the Early Empires, Economies in History and Theory. (The Free Press 1957) 64–94. - Raz J, ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’ (1972) 81 Yale LJ 823. DOI: 10.2307/795152
- Reinhold S, ‘Good Faith in International Law’ (2013) 2 UCLJLJ 40. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2269746
- Rogers A, ‘Humanitarian Intervention and International Law’ (2004) 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 725.
- Russel F R, The Just War in the Middle Ages (CUP 1975).
- Schauer F,
‘Proportionality and the Question of Weight’ in Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber (eds), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (CUP 2014). - Schmitt M N,
‘Fault Lines in the Law of Attack’ in Susan C. Breau and Agnieszka Jachec-Neale (eds), Testing the Boundaries of International Humanitarian Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006). - Shanske D, ‘Four Theses: Preliminary to an Appeal to Equity’ (2005) 57 Stan L Rev 2053.
- Sheehan J A, ‘The Entebbe Raid: The Principle of Self-Help in International Law as Justification for State Use of Armed Force’ (1977) 1 The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 147.
- Sieckmann J,
‘Proportionality as a Universal Human Rights Principle’ in David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.) Proportionality in Law: An Analytical Perspective (Springer 2018). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-89647-2_1 - Sloane R D, ‘The Cost of Conflation: Preserving the Dualism of Jus Ad Bellum and Jus In Bello in the Contemporary Law of War’ (2009) 34 Yale J Int’l L 47.
- Schlink B, ‘Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere But Here?’ (2012) 22 Duke J Comp & Intl L 291–302.
- Shaw M N, International Law (7th ed, CUP 2014).
- Steerling E, ‘The Lawless Law of Nations’ (1925) 10 St Louis L Rev 171.
- Stone Sweet A and Mathews J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Colum J Transnat’l L 72.
- Summers R S, ‘Good Faith in General Contract Law and the Sales Provision of the Uniform Commercial Code’, 54 (1968) Va. L. Rev 195. DOI: 10.2307/1071744
- Tuck R, The Rights of War and Peace (OUP, 1999).
- Tuori K,
‘The Reception of Ancient Legal Thought in Early Modern International Law’ in Bardo Fassbender and Peters A (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: OUP 2012). DOI: 10.1093/law/9780199599752.003.0043 - Turner Johnson J, Just War Tradition and The Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry (Princeton University Press 1981). DOI: 10.1515/9781400855568
- Ucaryilmaz T, ‘The Principle of Good Faith in Public International Law’ (2020) 68 Revista de la Universidad de Deusto 43. DOI: 10.18543/ed-68(1)-2020pp43-59
- von Elbe J, ‘The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law’ (1939) 33 Am. J. Int’l L. 665. DOI: 10.2307/2192879
- von Jhering R, Geist des Römisches Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung, 1. Band (Breitkopf und Härtel, 1865).
- von Marten K, Précis de Droit des Gens Moderne de l’Europe Fondés sur Les Traités et l’Usage (Gottingue 1789).
- Waldron J, ‘Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium’ (2005) 119 Harv L Rev 129.
- Watson A,
‘Equity in the Time of Cicero’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebrew University 1997). - Watson, The Digest of Justinian, Vol. 1–4 (University of Pennsylvania, 1998).
- Webster J, ‘The Just War: Graeco-Roman Texts as Colonial Discourse’ in Sally Cottam, David Dungworth, Sarah Scott, Jeremy Taylor (eds), TRAC 94: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference (
Oxford Oxbow 1994). - Wendt A, The Social Theory of Law (6th edition, CUP 2003).
- Winkel L, ‘Le Droit Romain Et La Philosophie Grecque, Quelques Problèmes De Méthode’ (1996) 65 TvR 373. DOI: 10.1163/157181996X00283
- Yoshifumi T, ‘Reflections on the Concept of Proportionality in the Law of Maritime Delimitation’ (2001) 16 Int J Mar Coast Law 433. DOI: 10.1163/15718080120493128
- Ziegler K H,
‘Aequitas in Roman International Law’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (eds), Aequitas and Equity (Hebrew University 1997).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.529 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 32
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2021
Published on: Mar 11, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2021 Talya Ucaryilmaz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.