The Elusive Contours of Constitutional Identity: Taricco as a Missed Opportunity
By: Robbert Bruggeman and Joris Larik
References
- Arroyo Jiménez L, ‘Constitutional empathy and judicial dialogue in the European Union’ (2018) 24 EPL 57. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3211817
- Avbelj M, ‘Questioning EU constitutionalisms’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 1. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200006283
- Bassini M and O Pollicino, ‘Defusing the Taricco bomb through fostering constitutional tolerance: All roads lead to Rome’ (Verfassungsblog, 5 December 2017) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/defusing-the-taricco-bomb-through-fostering-constitutional-tolerance-all-roads-lead-to-rome/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Belov M, ‘The functions of constitutional identity performed in the context of constitutionalization of the EU order and the Europeanization of the legal orders of EU Member States’ (2017) 9 Perspectives on Federalism 72. DOI: 10.1515/pof-2017-0010
- Besselink L, ‘Case C-208/09, Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2010: Respecting constitutional identity in the EU’ (2012) 49 CMLR 671
- Besselink L, ‘National and constitutional identity before and after Lisbon’ (2010) 6 Utrecht Law Review 36. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.139
- Besselink L, ‘The parameters of constitutional conflict after Melloni’ (2014) 39 ELR 531
- Billis E, ‘On the methodology of comparative criminal law research: Paradigmatic approaches to the research method of functional comparison and the heuristic device of ideal types’ (2017) 24 MJECL 864. DOI: 10.1177/1023263X17745795
- Billis E, ‘The European Court of Justice: A “quasi-constitutional court” in criminal matters? The Taricco judgment and its shortcomings’ (2016) 7 NJECL 20. DOI: 10.1177/203228441600700103
- Blanke H-J and S Mangiameli,
‘Article 4 [The relations between the EU and the Member States]’ in Hermann-Josef Blanke and Stelio Mangiameli (eds), The Treaty on European Union: A Commentary (Springer 2013). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31706-4 - Bobek M,
‘The effects of EU law in the national legal systems’ in Catherina Barnard and Steve Peers (eds), European Union Law (2nd edn, OUP 2017). DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198789130.003.0006 - Bonelli M, ‘The Taricco saga and the consolidation of judicial dialogue in the European Union – CJEU, C-105/14 Ivo Taricco and others, ECLI:EU:C: C:2015:555. C-42/17 M.A.S, M.B., ECLI:EU:C:2017:936 Italian Constitutional Court, Order no. 24/2017’ (2018) 25 MJECL 357
- Börzel T and T Risse, ‘From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics’ (2018) 25 JEPP 83. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281
- Budinska B and Z Vikarska, ‘Judicial dialogue after Taricco II: Who has the last word, in the end?’ (EU Law Analysis, 7 December 2017) <
http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.nl/2017/12/criminal-law-human-rights-and.html > accessed 23 February 2019 - Burchardt D, ‘Belitting the primacy of EU law in Taricco II’ (Verfassungsblog, 7 December 2017) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/belittling-the-primacy-of-eu-law-in-taricco-ii/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Claes M, ‘The validity and primacy of EU law and the “cooperative relationship” between national constitutional courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2016) 23 MJECL 151. DOI: 10.1177/1023263X1602300109
- Claes M and J-H Reestman, ‘The protection of national constitutional identity and the limits of European integration at the occasion of the Gauweiler case’ (2015) 16 GLR 917. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200019957
- Cloots E, National Identity in EU Law (OUP 2015). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733768.001.0001
- Davies B, ‘Resistance to European Law and constitutional identity in Germany: Herbert Kraus and Solange in its intellectual context’ (2015) 21 ELJ 434. DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12141
- de Boer N, ‘Case C-399/11, Stefano Melloni v Ministerio Fiscal, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2013: Addressing rights divergences under the Charter: Melloni’ (2013) 50 CMLR 1083
- Fabbrini F, and O Pollicino, Constitutional identity in Italy: European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution (2017) European University Institute Working Paper 2017/06, 8–9 <
http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/45605/LAW_2017_06.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y > accessed 23 February 2019 - Faraguna P et al., ‘Developments in Italian constitutional law: The year 2016 in review’ (2017) 15 I-CON 763. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mox061
- Faraguna P, ‘The Italian constitutional court in re Taricco: “Gauweiler in the Roman Campagna”’ (Verfassungsblog, 31 January 2017) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/the-italian-constitutional-court-in-re-taricco-gauweiler-in-the-roman-campagna/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Federico F, and A Sajó, ‘The dangers of constitutional identity’ (2019) 25 ELJ 1, 4–5
- Giuffrida F, ‘Taricco principles beyond Taricco: Some thoughts on three pending cases (Scialdone, Kolev and Menci’ (2018) 9 NJECL 31. DOI: 10.1177/2032284418761068
- Giuffrida F, ‘The limitation period of crimes: Same old Italian story, new intriguing European answers: Case note on C-105/14, Taricco’ (2016) 7 NJECL 100. DOI: 10.1177/203228441600700107
- Guastaferro B, ‘The unexpectedly talkative “dumb son”: the Italian Constitutional Court’s dialogue with the European Court of Justice in protecting temporary workers’ rights in the public education sector’ (2017) 13 EuConst 493. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019617000220
- Halmai G, ‘Abuse of constitutional identity. The Hungarian constitutional court on interpretation of article E)(2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23. DOI: 10.1163/15730352-04301002
- Halmai G, ‘The Hungarian constitutional court and constitutional identity’ (Verfassungsblog, 10 January 2017) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-and-constitutional-identity/ > accessed 23 February 2019. DOI: 10.1163/15730352-04301002 - Hong M, ‘Human dignity and constitutional identity: the Solange-III-decision of the German Constitutional Court’ (Verfassungsblog, 18 February 2016) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/human-dignity-and-constitutional-identity-the-solange-iii-decision-of-the-german-constitutional-court/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Kaiafa-Gbandi M, ‘ECJ’s recent case-law on criminal matters: Protection of fundamental rights in EU law and its importance for Member States’ national judiciary’ (2017) 7 EuConst 219. DOI: 10.5771/2193-5505-2017-3-218
- Kelemen K, ‘The Hungarian constitutional court and the concept of national constitutional identity’ (2017) 15/16 Ianus – Diritto e finanza 23
- Krajewski M, ‘A way out for the ECJ in Taricco II: Constitutional identity or a more careful proportionality analysis?’ (European Law Blog, 23 November 2017) <
http://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/11/23/a-way-out-for-the-ecj-in-taricco-ii-constitutional-identity-or-a-more-careful-proportionality-analysis/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Larik J, ‘Prêt-à-ratifier: The CETA Decision of the French Conseil constitutionnel of 31 July 2017’ (2017) 13 EuConst 759. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019617000335
- Manacorda S, ‘The Taricco saga: A risk or an opportunity for European Criminal Law’ (2018) 9 NJECL 4. DOI: 10.1177/2032284418760927
- Manes V, ‘Some lessons from the Taricco saga’ (2018) 9 NJECL 12. DOI: 10.1177/2032284418761393
- Mayer F and M Wendel,
‘Multilevel constitutionalism and constitutional pluralism’ in Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek (eds), Constitutional pluralism in the European Union and beyond (Hart Publishing 2012) - Mitsilegas V, ‘Judicial dialogue in three silences: Unpacking Taricco’ (2018) 9 NJECL 38. DOI: 10.1177/2032284418761062
- Mohay A and N Tóth, ‘Decision 22/2016 (XII 5) AB on the interpretation of article E(2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2017) 111 AJIL 468. DOI: 10.1017/ajil.2017.32
- Nowag J, ‘2 BvR 2735/14, Mr R v Order of the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, Order of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Second Senate) of 15 December 2015 DE:BVerfG:2015:rs20151215.2bvr273514: EU law, constitutional identity, and human dignity: A toxic mix? Bundesverfassungsgericht: Mr R’ (2016) 53 CMLR 1441
- Paris D, ‘Carrot and stick. The Italian constitutional court’s preliminary reference in the case Taricco’ (Questions of International Law, 31 March 2017) <
http://www.qil-qdi.org/carrot-stick-italian-constitutional-courts-preliminary-reference-case-taricco/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Pech L and K L Scheppele, ‘Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU’ (2017) 17 CYELS 3. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3009280
- Peers S, ‘The Italian Job: The CJEU strengthens criminal law protection of the EU’s finances’ (EU Law Analysis, 22 September 2015) <
http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.nl/2015/09/the-italian-job-cjeu-strengthens.html > accessed 23 February 2019 - Peristeridou C and J Ouwerkerk, ‘A bridge over troubled water – a criminal lawyers’ response to Taricco II’ (Verfassungsblog, 12 December 2017) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/a-bridge-over-troubled-water-a-criminal-lawyers-response-to-taricco-ii/ > accessed 23 February 2019 - Peters A, ‘The bananas decision (2000) of the Federal German Constitutional Court: towards reconciliation with the European Court of Justice as regards fundamental rights protection in Europe’ (2000) 43 German Yearbook of International Law 276
- Piqani D, ‘Arguments for a Holistic Approach in European Constitutionalism: What Role for National Institutions in Avoiding Constitutional Conflicts between National Constitutions and EU law’ (2012) 8 EuConst 493. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019612000302
- Poli M, ‘The judicial dialogue in Europe’ (2017) 11 Vienna on International Constitutional Law 351. DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0022
- Rauschegger C, ‘National constitutional rights and the primacy of EU law: M.A.S’ (2019) 55 CMLR 1522, 1543.
- Rosenfeld M,
‘Constitutional identity’ in Michael Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP 2012). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.001.0001 - Schütze R,
‘Constitutionalism and the European Union’ in Catherine Barnard and Steve Peers (eds), European Union Law (2nd edn, OUP 2017). DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198789130.003.0004 - Sicurella R, ‘Effectiveness of EU law and protection of fundamental rights: The questions settled and the new challenges after the ECJ decision in the MAS and MB case (C-42/17)’ (2018) 9 NJECL 24. DOI: 10.1177/2032284418761066
- Taggart P,
‘Populism in Western Europe’ in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (OUP 2017). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.12 - Timmerman M, ‘Case C-105/14, Criminal proceedings against Ivo Taricco and Others, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2016, EU:C:2015:555: Balancing effective criminal sanctions with effective fundamental rights protection in cases of VAT fraud: Taricco’ (2016) 53 CMLR 779
- Torres Pérez A, ‘The federalizing force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2017) 15 I-CON 1080. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mox075
- van der Schyff G, ‘Exploring Member State and European Union constitutional identity’ (2016) 22 EPL 227
- Viganò F, ‘Melloni overruled? Considerations on the Taricco II judgment of the Court of Justice’ (2018) 9 NJECL 18. DOI: 10.1177/2032284418760926
- von Bogdandy A and S Schill, ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’ (2011) 48 CMLR 1417
- Walker N, ‘The idea of constitutional pluralism’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 317. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.00383
- Weiß W, ‘Human rights in the EU: Rethinking the role of the European Convention on Human Rights after Lisbon’ (2011) 7 EuConst 64. DOI: 10.1017/S157401961110005X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.489 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 34
Submitted on: Feb 26, 2019
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2020
Published on: Sep 23, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2020 Robbert Bruggeman, Joris Larik, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.