
UN Security Council and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legal Foundations of the Responsibility to Protect in International Law
References
- Arbour L, ‘The Responsibility to Protect as a Duty of Care in International Law and Practice’ (2008) 34 Review of International Studies 445. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210508008115
- Aust A, Handbook of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2010). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511841460
- Badescu CG, Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Security and Human Rights (Routledge 2011). DOI: 10.4324/9780203834541
- Bassiouni MC, Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law (Kluwer Law International 1999)
- Bellamy AJ, Responsibility to Protect (Polity Press 2009). DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2009.00365.x
- Bellamy AJ, ‘Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect in the United Nations System: Dilemmas, Challenges and Opportunities’ (2013) 5 Global Responsibility to Protect 154. DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00502003
- Birdsall A, The International Politics of Judicial Intervention: Creating a More Just Order (Routledge 2009). DOI: 10.4324/9780203888483
- Breau S, The Responsibility to Protect in International Law: An Emerging Paradigm Shift (1st edition, Routledge 2016). DOI: 10.4324/9781315737287
- Bricmont J, Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War (NYU Press 2006)
- Buchanan A,
‘Reforming the International Law of Humanitarian Intervention’ in JL Holzgrefe and Robert O Keohane (eds), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge University Press 2003). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494000.005 - Carswell AJ, ‘Unblocking the UN Security Council: The Uniting for Peace Resolution’ (2013) 18 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 453. DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/krt016
- Cheng B, ‘United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” International Customary Law’ (1965) 5 Indian Journal of International Law 23
- Chetail V, ‘The Contribution of the International Court of Justice to International Humanitarian Law’ (2003) 85 International Review of the Red Cross 35. DOI: 10.1017/S1560775500115172
- Coomans F and Kamminga MT, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Intersentia nv 2004)
- Crawford J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (1st edition, Cambridge University Press 2002)
- Crawford J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2008)
- de Chazournes LB and Condorelli L, ‘Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions Revisited: Protecting Collective Interests – ICRC’ (2000) 837 International Review of the Red Cross
- Dunne T,
‘The Responsibility to Protect and World Order’ in Ramesh Thakur and William Maley (eds), Theorising the responsibility to protect (Cambridge Univ Press 2015) - Evans G, The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All (Brookings Institution Press 2008). DOI: 10.1353/isia.2009.0001
- Genser J, ‘The United Nations Security Council’s Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect: A Review of Past Interventions and Recommendations for Improvement’ (2018) 18 Chicago Journal of International Law
- Genser J and Ugarte BS (eds), The United Nations Security Council in the Age of Human Rights (Reprint edition, Cambridge University Press 2016)
- Glanville L, ‘The Responsibility to Protect Beyond Borders’ (2012) 12 Human Rights Law Review 1. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngr047
- Glanville L, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History (University of Chicago Press 2013). DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226077086.001.0001
- Gray CD, International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford University Press 2008)
- Hakimi M, ‘State Bystander Responsibility’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 341. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chq037
- Harris DJ, Cases and Materials on International Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2010)
- Hoof GJH van, Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1983)
- Hunter A and McIntosh M, New Perspectives on Human Security (2010)
- Janzekovic J and Silander D, Responsibility to Protect and Prevent: Principles, Promises and Practicalities (Reissue edition, Anthem Press 2014). DOI: 10.4135/9781473906020.n34
- Jørgensen NHB,
‘The Responsibility to Protect and the Obligations of States and Organizations under the Law of International Responsibility’ in J Hoffmann, A Nollkaemper and I Swerissen (eds), Responsibility to Protect: From Principle to Practice (Amsterdam University Press 2012). DOI: 10.1017/9789048515042.011 - Jovanović MA, ‘Responsibility to Protect and the International Rule of Law’ (2015) 14 Chinese Journal of International Law 757. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmv042
- Joyner C, ‘U.N. General Assembly Resolutions and International Law: Rethinking the Contemporary Dynamics of Norm-Creation’ (1981) 11 California Western International Law Journal
- Kirby M,
‘UN Special Procedures for Defending Universal Human Rights’ in Charles Sampford and Ramesh Thakur (eds), Institutional Supports for the International Rule of Law (Routledge 2014) - Knight WA and Egerton F (eds), The Routledge Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect (1st edition, Routledge 2012). DOI: 10.4324/9780203117637
- Kuwali D, The Responsibility to Protect: Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011). DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004191716.i-530
- Le Mon C and Taylor RS, ‘Security Council Action in the Name of Human Rights: From Rhodesia to the Congo’ (2004) 10 UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 197
- Lepard BD, Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention: A Fresh Legal Approach Based on Fundamental Ethical Principles in International Law and World Religions (Pennsylvania State University Press 2003)
- Malanczuk P and Akehurst MB, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (Routledge 1997). DOI: 10.5771/0506-7286-1998-2-223
- Martin FF and others, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Treaties, Cases, and Analysis (Cambridge University Press 2006). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808746
- Martin S, ‘Forced Migration, the Refugee Regime and the Responsibility to Protect’ (2010) 2 Global Responsibility to Protect 38. DOI: 10.1163/187598410X12602515137338
- Menon R, The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention (Oxford University Press 2016)
- Milanovic M, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (1st edition, Oxford University Press 2011). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696208.003.0001
- Müller J, Reforming the United Nations: The Struggle for Legitimacy and Effectiveness (Martinus Nijhoff 2006). DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004151314.i-531
- Murphy J, ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Comes of Age? A Skeptics View’ (2011) 18 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 413
- Öberg MD, ‘The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 879. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chi151
- Peters A, ‘Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 513. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chp026
- Peters A, ‘The Security Council’s Responsibility to Protect’ (2011) 8 International Organizations Law Review 15. DOI: 10.1163/157237411X584075
- Petersen N, ‘Customary Law Without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation’ (2007) 23 American University International Law Review
- Piiparinen T, The Transformation of UN Conflict Management: Producing Images of Genocide from Rwanda to Darfur and Beyond (1st edition, Routledge 2010). DOI: 10.4324/9780203870679
- Ramcharan BG, The Security Council and the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2002). DOI: 10.1163/9789047403166
- Ramcharan B, The Law, Policy and Politics of the UN Human Rights Council (Brill Nijhoff 2015). DOI: 10.1163/9789004289031
- Reinold T, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: The Power of Norms and the Norms of the Powerful (Routledge 2013). DOI: 10.4324/9780203080740
- Rosenberg SP, ‘Responsibility to Protect: A Framework for Prevention’ (2009) 1 Global Responsibility to Protect 442. DOI: 10.1163/187598509X12505800144837
- Scharf M, ‘Seizing the Grotian Moment: Accelerated Formation of Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change’ (2010) 43 Cornell International Law Journal 439
- Scharf M, ‘The “Grotian Concept”’ (2011) 19 ILSA Quarterly
- Schutter OD, International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary (1st edition, Cambridge University Press 2010). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511779312
- Silander D and Wallace D (eds), International Organizations and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect: The Humanitarian Crisis in Syria (Routledge 2015). DOI: 10.4324/9781315709642
- Simma B and others (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Volume I, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press 2012)
- Sloan B, United Nations General Assembly Resolutions in Our Changing World (Brill Nijhoff 1991)
- Stahn C and Sluiter G, The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009). DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774
- Subramanian SR, ‘Too Similar or Too Difficult: State of Necessity as a Defence under Customary International Law and the Bilateral Investment Treaty and Their Relationship’ (2012) 9 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 68
- UN.
Department of Peacekeeping Operations (ed), Handbook on United Nations Multidimensional Peacekeeping Operations (UN 2003) - Viikari L,
‘Responsibility to Protect and the Environmental Considerations: A Fundamental Mismatch or the Way Forward?’ in Peter Hilpold (ed), The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) (Brill Nijhoff 2015) - Weerdesteijn M and Holá B, ‘“Tool in the R2P Toolbox”? Analysing the Role of the International Criminal Court in the Three Pillars of the Responsibility to Protect’ (2020) 31 Criminal Law Forum 377. DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x
- Yee S, ‘The Dynamic Interplay between the Interpreters of Security Council Resolutions’ (2012) 11 Chinese Journal of International Law 613. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jms086
- Yee S, ‘A Reply to Sir Michael Wood’s Response to AALCOIEG’s Work and My Report on the ILC Project on Identification of Customary International Law’ (2016) 15 Chinese Journal of International Law 33. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmw010
- Zyberi G (ed), An Institutional Approach to the Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge University Press 2013). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139567664
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.471 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 40
Submitted on: Jun 8, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2021
Published on: Jun 10, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2022 S. R. Subramanian, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.